Cargando…
Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Clinical benefit of paclitaxel-coated devices for patients with peripheral arterial disease has been confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis published in 2018 identified late mortality risk over a long follow-up period due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices in...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36227807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275888 |
_version_ | 1784807763958824960 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Chenyang Yin, Guosheng |
author_facet | Zhang, Chenyang Yin, Guosheng |
author_sort | Zhang, Chenyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical benefit of paclitaxel-coated devices for patients with peripheral arterial disease has been confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis published in 2018 identified late mortality risk over a long follow-up period due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries, which caused enormous controversy and debates globally. This study aims to further evaluate the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices by incorporating the most recently published data. METHODS: We searched for candidate studies in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE (Ovid) online databases, government web archives and international cardiovascular conferences. Safety endpoints of interest included all-cause mortality rates at one, two and five years and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the summary measure. The primary analysis was performed using random-effects models to account for potential clinical heterogeneity. FINDINGS: Thirty-nine RCTs including 9164 patients were identified. At one year, the random-effects model yielded a pooled RR of 1.06 (95% CI [0.87, 1.29]) indicating no difference in short-term all-cause deaths between the paclitaxel and control groups (crude mortality, 4.3%, 214/5025 versus 4.5%, 177/3965). Two-year mortality was reported in 26 RCTs with 382 deaths out of 3788 patients (10.1%) in the paclitaxel arm and 299 out of 2955 patients (10.1%) in the control arm and no association was found between increased risk of death and usage of paclitaxel-coated devices (RR 1.08, 95% CI [0.93, 1.25]). Eight RCTs recorded all-cause deaths up to five years and a pooled RR of 1.18 (95% CI [0.92, 1.51]) demonstrated no late mortality risk due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices (crude mortality, paclitaxel 18.2%, 247/1360 versus control 15.2%, 122/805). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in either short- or long-term all-cause mortalities between patients receiving paclitaxel-coated and uncoated devices. Further research on the longer-term safety of paclitaxel usage (e.g., 8- or 10-year) is warranted. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021246291. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9560511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95605112022-10-14 Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Chenyang Yin, Guosheng PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical benefit of paclitaxel-coated devices for patients with peripheral arterial disease has been confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis published in 2018 identified late mortality risk over a long follow-up period due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries, which caused enormous controversy and debates globally. This study aims to further evaluate the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices by incorporating the most recently published data. METHODS: We searched for candidate studies in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE (Ovid) online databases, government web archives and international cardiovascular conferences. Safety endpoints of interest included all-cause mortality rates at one, two and five years and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the summary measure. The primary analysis was performed using random-effects models to account for potential clinical heterogeneity. FINDINGS: Thirty-nine RCTs including 9164 patients were identified. At one year, the random-effects model yielded a pooled RR of 1.06 (95% CI [0.87, 1.29]) indicating no difference in short-term all-cause deaths between the paclitaxel and control groups (crude mortality, 4.3%, 214/5025 versus 4.5%, 177/3965). Two-year mortality was reported in 26 RCTs with 382 deaths out of 3788 patients (10.1%) in the paclitaxel arm and 299 out of 2955 patients (10.1%) in the control arm and no association was found between increased risk of death and usage of paclitaxel-coated devices (RR 1.08, 95% CI [0.93, 1.25]). Eight RCTs recorded all-cause deaths up to five years and a pooled RR of 1.18 (95% CI [0.92, 1.51]) demonstrated no late mortality risk due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices (crude mortality, paclitaxel 18.2%, 247/1360 versus control 15.2%, 122/805). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in either short- or long-term all-cause mortalities between patients receiving paclitaxel-coated and uncoated devices. Further research on the longer-term safety of paclitaxel usage (e.g., 8- or 10-year) is warranted. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021246291. Public Library of Science 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9560511/ /pubmed/36227807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275888 Text en © 2022 Zhang, Yin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Chenyang Yin, Guosheng Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36227807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangchenyang safetyofpaclitaxelcoateddevicesinthefemoropoplitealarteriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinguosheng safetyofpaclitaxelcoateddevicesinthefemoropoplitealarteriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |