Cargando…
Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology
PURPOSE: The recent exponential growth in teleophthalmology has been limited in part by the lack of a validated method to measure visual acuity (VA) remotely. We investigated the validity of a self-administered Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) home VA test. We hypothesized that a h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100007 |
_version_ | 1784807769893765120 |
---|---|
author | Siktberg, Jonathan Hamdan, Saif Liu, Yuhan Chen, Qingxia Donahue, Sean P. Patel, Shriji N. Sternberg, Paul Robinson, Joshua Kammer, Jeffrey A. Gangaputra, Sapna S. |
author_facet | Siktberg, Jonathan Hamdan, Saif Liu, Yuhan Chen, Qingxia Donahue, Sean P. Patel, Shriji N. Sternberg, Paul Robinson, Joshua Kammer, Jeffrey A. Gangaputra, Sapna S. |
author_sort | Siktberg, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The recent exponential growth in teleophthalmology has been limited in part by the lack of a validated method to measure visual acuity (VA) remotely. We investigated the validity of a self-administered Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) home VA test. We hypothesized that a home VA test with a printout ETDRS chart is equivalent to a standard technician-administered VA test in clinic. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred nine eyes from 108 patients who had a scheduled in-person outpatient ophthalmology clinic visit at an academic medical center. METHODS: Enrolled patients were sent a .pdf document consisting of instructions and a printout ETDRS vision chart calibrated for 5 feet. Patients completed the VA test at home before the in-person appointment, where their VA was measured by an ophthalmic technician using a standard ETDRS chart. Survey questions about the ease of testing and barriers to completion were administered. For the bioequivalence test with a 5% nominal level, the 2 1-sided tests procedure was used, and an equivalent 90% confidence interval (CI) was constructed and compared with the prespecified 7-letter equivalence margin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the mean adjusted letter score difference between the home and clinic tests. Secondary outcomes included the unadjusted letter difference, absolute letter difference, and survey question responses. RESULTS: The mean adjusted VA letter score difference was 4.1 letters (90% CI, 3.2–4.9 letters), well within the 7-letter equivalence margin. Average unadjusted VA scores in clinic were 3.9 letters (90% CI, 3.1–4.7 letters) more than scores at home. The absolute difference was 5.2 letters (90% CI, 4.6–5.9 letters). Ninety-eight percent of patients agreed that the home test was easy to perform. CONCLUSIONS: An ETDRS VA test self-administered at home following a standardized protocol was equivalent to a standard technician-administered VA test in clinic in the examined population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9560535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95605352022-10-14 Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology Siktberg, Jonathan Hamdan, Saif Liu, Yuhan Chen, Qingxia Donahue, Sean P. Patel, Shriji N. Sternberg, Paul Robinson, Joshua Kammer, Jeffrey A. Gangaputra, Sapna S. Ophthalmol Sci Original Article PURPOSE: The recent exponential growth in teleophthalmology has been limited in part by the lack of a validated method to measure visual acuity (VA) remotely. We investigated the validity of a self-administered Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) home VA test. We hypothesized that a home VA test with a printout ETDRS chart is equivalent to a standard technician-administered VA test in clinic. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred nine eyes from 108 patients who had a scheduled in-person outpatient ophthalmology clinic visit at an academic medical center. METHODS: Enrolled patients were sent a .pdf document consisting of instructions and a printout ETDRS vision chart calibrated for 5 feet. Patients completed the VA test at home before the in-person appointment, where their VA was measured by an ophthalmic technician using a standard ETDRS chart. Survey questions about the ease of testing and barriers to completion were administered. For the bioequivalence test with a 5% nominal level, the 2 1-sided tests procedure was used, and an equivalent 90% confidence interval (CI) was constructed and compared with the prespecified 7-letter equivalence margin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the mean adjusted letter score difference between the home and clinic tests. Secondary outcomes included the unadjusted letter difference, absolute letter difference, and survey question responses. RESULTS: The mean adjusted VA letter score difference was 4.1 letters (90% CI, 3.2–4.9 letters), well within the 7-letter equivalence margin. Average unadjusted VA scores in clinic were 3.9 letters (90% CI, 3.1–4.7 letters) more than scores at home. The absolute difference was 5.2 letters (90% CI, 4.6–5.9 letters). Ninety-eight percent of patients agreed that the home test was easy to perform. CONCLUSIONS: An ETDRS VA test self-administered at home following a standardized protocol was equivalent to a standard technician-administered VA test in clinic in the examined population. Elsevier 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9560535/ /pubmed/36246005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100007 Text en © 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Siktberg, Jonathan Hamdan, Saif Liu, Yuhan Chen, Qingxia Donahue, Sean P. Patel, Shriji N. Sternberg, Paul Robinson, Joshua Kammer, Jeffrey A. Gangaputra, Sapna S. Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology |
title | Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology |
title_full | Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology |
title_short | Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology |
title_sort | validation of a standardized home visual acuity test for teleophthalmology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siktbergjonathan validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT hamdansaif validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT liuyuhan validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT chenqingxia validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT donahueseanp validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT patelshrijin validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT sternbergpaul validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT robinsonjoshua validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT kammerjeffreya validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology AT gangaputrasapnas validationofastandardizedhomevisualacuitytestforteleophthalmology |