Cargando…

Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

PURPOSE: Develop computer vision models for image-based differentiation of bacterial and fungal corneal ulcers and compare their performance against human experts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison of diagnostic performance. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with acute, culture-proven bacterial or fungal kera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redd, Travis K., Prajna, N. Venkatesh, Srinivasan, Muthiah, Lalitha, Prajna, Krishnan, Tiru, Rajaraman, Revathi, Venugopal, Anitha, Acharya, Nisha, Seitzman, Gerami D., Lietman, Thomas M., Keenan, Jeremy D., Campbell, J. Peter, Song, Xubo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100119
_version_ 1784807775558172672
author Redd, Travis K.
Prajna, N. Venkatesh
Srinivasan, Muthiah
Lalitha, Prajna
Krishnan, Tiru
Rajaraman, Revathi
Venugopal, Anitha
Acharya, Nisha
Seitzman, Gerami D.
Lietman, Thomas M.
Keenan, Jeremy D.
Campbell, J. Peter
Song, Xubo
author_facet Redd, Travis K.
Prajna, N. Venkatesh
Srinivasan, Muthiah
Lalitha, Prajna
Krishnan, Tiru
Rajaraman, Revathi
Venugopal, Anitha
Acharya, Nisha
Seitzman, Gerami D.
Lietman, Thomas M.
Keenan, Jeremy D.
Campbell, J. Peter
Song, Xubo
author_sort Redd, Travis K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Develop computer vision models for image-based differentiation of bacterial and fungal corneal ulcers and compare their performance against human experts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison of diagnostic performance. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with acute, culture-proven bacterial or fungal keratitis from 4 centers in South India. METHODS: Five convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained using images from handheld cameras collected from patients with culture-proven corneal ulcers in South India recruited as part of clinical trials conducted between 2006 and 2015. Their performance was evaluated on 2 hold-out test sets (1 single center and 1 multicenter) from South India. Twelve local expert cornea specialists performed remote interpretation of the images in the multicenter test set to enable direct comparison against CNN performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) individually and for each group collectively (i.e., CNN ensemble and human ensemble). RESULTS: The best-performing CNN architecture was MobileNet, which attained an AUC of 0.86 on the single-center test set (other CNNs range, 0.68–0.84) and 0.83 on the multicenter test set (other CNNs range, 0.75–0.83). Expert human AUCs on the multicenter test set ranged from 0.42 to 0.79. The CNN ensemble achieved a statistically significantly higher AUC (0.84) than the human ensemble (0.76; P < 0.01). CNNs showed relatively higher accuracy for fungal (81%) versus bacterial (75%) ulcers, whereas humans showed relatively higher accuracy for bacterial (88%) versus fungal (56%) ulcers. An ensemble of the best-performing CNN and best-performing human achieved the highest AUC of 0.87, although this was not statistically significantly higher than the best CNN (0.83; P = 0.17) or best human (0.79; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Computer vision models achieved superhuman performance in identifying the underlying infectious cause of corneal ulcers compared with cornea specialists. The best-performing model, MobileNet, attained an AUC of 0.83 to 0.86 without any additional clinical or historical information. These findings suggest the potential for future implementation of these models to enable earlier directed antimicrobial therapy in the management of infectious keratitis, which may improve visual outcomes. Additional studies are ongoing to incorporate clinical history and expert opinion into predictive models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9560557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95605572022-10-14 Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Redd, Travis K. Prajna, N. Venkatesh Srinivasan, Muthiah Lalitha, Prajna Krishnan, Tiru Rajaraman, Revathi Venugopal, Anitha Acharya, Nisha Seitzman, Gerami D. Lietman, Thomas M. Keenan, Jeremy D. Campbell, J. Peter Song, Xubo Ophthalmol Sci Original Article PURPOSE: Develop computer vision models for image-based differentiation of bacterial and fungal corneal ulcers and compare their performance against human experts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison of diagnostic performance. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with acute, culture-proven bacterial or fungal keratitis from 4 centers in South India. METHODS: Five convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained using images from handheld cameras collected from patients with culture-proven corneal ulcers in South India recruited as part of clinical trials conducted between 2006 and 2015. Their performance was evaluated on 2 hold-out test sets (1 single center and 1 multicenter) from South India. Twelve local expert cornea specialists performed remote interpretation of the images in the multicenter test set to enable direct comparison against CNN performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) individually and for each group collectively (i.e., CNN ensemble and human ensemble). RESULTS: The best-performing CNN architecture was MobileNet, which attained an AUC of 0.86 on the single-center test set (other CNNs range, 0.68–0.84) and 0.83 on the multicenter test set (other CNNs range, 0.75–0.83). Expert human AUCs on the multicenter test set ranged from 0.42 to 0.79. The CNN ensemble achieved a statistically significantly higher AUC (0.84) than the human ensemble (0.76; P < 0.01). CNNs showed relatively higher accuracy for fungal (81%) versus bacterial (75%) ulcers, whereas humans showed relatively higher accuracy for bacterial (88%) versus fungal (56%) ulcers. An ensemble of the best-performing CNN and best-performing human achieved the highest AUC of 0.87, although this was not statistically significantly higher than the best CNN (0.83; P = 0.17) or best human (0.79; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Computer vision models achieved superhuman performance in identifying the underlying infectious cause of corneal ulcers compared with cornea specialists. The best-performing model, MobileNet, attained an AUC of 0.83 to 0.86 without any additional clinical or historical information. These findings suggest the potential for future implementation of these models to enable earlier directed antimicrobial therapy in the management of infectious keratitis, which may improve visual outcomes. Additional studies are ongoing to incorporate clinical history and expert opinion into predictive models. Elsevier 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9560557/ /pubmed/36249698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100119 Text en © 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Redd, Travis K.
Prajna, N. Venkatesh
Srinivasan, Muthiah
Lalitha, Prajna
Krishnan, Tiru
Rajaraman, Revathi
Venugopal, Anitha
Acharya, Nisha
Seitzman, Gerami D.
Lietman, Thomas M.
Keenan, Jeremy D.
Campbell, J. Peter
Song, Xubo
Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
title Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
title_full Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
title_fullStr Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
title_short Image-Based Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
title_sort image-based differentiation of bacterial and fungal keratitis using deep convolutional neural networks
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100119
work_keys_str_mv AT reddtravisk imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT prajnanvenkatesh imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT srinivasanmuthiah imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT lalithaprajna imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT krishnantiru imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT rajaramanrevathi imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT venugopalanitha imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT acharyanisha imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT seitzmangeramid imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT lietmanthomasm imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT keenanjeremyd imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT campbelljpeter imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT songxubo imagebaseddifferentiationofbacterialandfungalkeratitisusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks