Cargando…

Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Rapid antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection have been authorized for emergency use (EUA); however, the performance has not been fully evaluated in clinical contexts. This study aimed to provide evidence regarding the diagnostic performan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Pei-Chin, Chiu, Hung-Pin, Cheng, Fang-Yi, Chang, Chih-Chun, Chu, Fang-Yeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9447251
_version_ 1784807842071445504
author Lin, Pei-Chin
Chiu, Hung-Pin
Cheng, Fang-Yi
Chang, Chih-Chun
Chu, Fang-Yeh
author_facet Lin, Pei-Chin
Chiu, Hung-Pin
Cheng, Fang-Yi
Chang, Chih-Chun
Chu, Fang-Yeh
author_sort Lin, Pei-Chin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection have been authorized for emergency use (EUA); however, the performance has not been fully evaluated in clinical contexts. This study aimed to provide evidence regarding the diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests compared with the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in the emergency department (ED) and community. METHODS: Patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests using the VTRUST COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (TD-4531) and real-time RT-PCR on the same day in the ED or community from May 24, 2021, to June 24, 2021, were examined. RESULTS: Paired nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 4022 suspected COVID-19 patients: 800 in the ED and 3222 in the community. Overall, 62 (1.54%) tested positive, 13 tested indeterminate, and 3947 tested negative by real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were 51.61% and 99.44% (overall), 62.50% and 99.61% (ED), and 31.82% and 99.40% (community), respectively. There were 30 false negatives and 22 false positives. Among the false negatives, 16.67% had a cycle threshold (Ct) value of <25. CONCLUSION: The VTRUST COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test showed comparable specificity as real-time RT-PCR for the ED and community, but the sensitivity was relatively low, especially when the Ct value was >25. This test can be useful for the rapid identification of infected subjects in an epidemic situation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9560843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95608432022-10-14 Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study Lin, Pei-Chin Chiu, Hung-Pin Cheng, Fang-Yi Chang, Chih-Chun Chu, Fang-Yeh Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Rapid antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection have been authorized for emergency use (EUA); however, the performance has not been fully evaluated in clinical contexts. This study aimed to provide evidence regarding the diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests compared with the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in the emergency department (ED) and community. METHODS: Patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests using the VTRUST COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (TD-4531) and real-time RT-PCR on the same day in the ED or community from May 24, 2021, to June 24, 2021, were examined. RESULTS: Paired nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 4022 suspected COVID-19 patients: 800 in the ED and 3222 in the community. Overall, 62 (1.54%) tested positive, 13 tested indeterminate, and 3947 tested negative by real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were 51.61% and 99.44% (overall), 62.50% and 99.61% (ED), and 31.82% and 99.40% (community), respectively. There were 30 false negatives and 22 false positives. Among the false negatives, 16.67% had a cycle threshold (Ct) value of <25. CONCLUSION: The VTRUST COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test showed comparable specificity as real-time RT-PCR for the ED and community, but the sensitivity was relatively low, especially when the Ct value was >25. This test can be useful for the rapid identification of infected subjects in an epidemic situation. Hindawi 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9560843/ /pubmed/36249591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9447251 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pei-Chin Lin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Pei-Chin
Chiu, Hung-Pin
Cheng, Fang-Yi
Chang, Chih-Chun
Chu, Fang-Yeh
Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study
title Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study
title_full Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study
title_short Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study
title_sort clinical performance of rapid antigen tests for the detection of sars-cov-2 infection in the emergency department and community: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9447251
work_keys_str_mv AT linpeichin clinicalperformanceofrapidantigentestsforthedetectionofsarscov2infectionintheemergencydepartmentandcommunityaretrospectivestudy
AT chiuhungpin clinicalperformanceofrapidantigentestsforthedetectionofsarscov2infectionintheemergencydepartmentandcommunityaretrospectivestudy
AT chengfangyi clinicalperformanceofrapidantigentestsforthedetectionofsarscov2infectionintheemergencydepartmentandcommunityaretrospectivestudy
AT changchihchun clinicalperformanceofrapidantigentestsforthedetectionofsarscov2infectionintheemergencydepartmentandcommunityaretrospectivestudy
AT chufangyeh clinicalperformanceofrapidantigentestsforthedetectionofsarscov2infectionintheemergencydepartmentandcommunityaretrospectivestudy