Cargando…

Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES: To compare the value of zero echo time (ZTE) and gradient echo “black bone” (BB) MRI sequences for bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint (SI) using computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2019 and January 2021, 79 patients prospectively un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolharn, Lucas, Guggenberger, Roman, Higashigaito, Kai, Sartoretti, Thomas, Winklhofer, Sebastian, Chung, Christine B., Finkenstaedt, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04097-3
_version_ 1784807856523968512
author Wolharn, Lucas
Guggenberger, Roman
Higashigaito, Kai
Sartoretti, Thomas
Winklhofer, Sebastian
Chung, Christine B.
Finkenstaedt, Tim
author_facet Wolharn, Lucas
Guggenberger, Roman
Higashigaito, Kai
Sartoretti, Thomas
Winklhofer, Sebastian
Chung, Christine B.
Finkenstaedt, Tim
author_sort Wolharn, Lucas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the value of zero echo time (ZTE) and gradient echo “black bone” (BB) MRI sequences for bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint (SI) using computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2019 and January 2021, 79 patients prospectively underwent clinically indicated 3-T MRI including ZTE and BB imaging. Additionally, all patients underwent a CT scan covering the SI joints within 12 months of the MRI examination. Two blinded readers performed bone assessment by grading each side of each SI joint qualitatively in terms of seven features (osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, erosions, ankylosis, joint irregularity, joint widening, and gas in the SI joint) using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = no changes–3 = marked changes). Scores were compared between all three imaging modalities. RESULTS: Interreader agreement was largely good (k values: 0.5–0.83). Except for the feature “gas in SI joint” where ZTE exhibited significantly lower scores than CT (p < 0.001), ZTE and BB showed similar performance relative to CT for all other features (p > 0.52) with inter-modality agreement being substantial to almost perfect (Krippendorff’s alpha coefficients: 0.724–0.983). When combining the data from all features except for gas in the SI joint and when binarizing grading scores, combined sensitivity/specificity was 76.7%/98.6% for ZTE and 80.8%/99.1% for BB, respectively, compared to CT. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of ZTE and BB sequences was comparable to CT for bone assessment of the SI joint. These sequences may potentially serve as an alternative to CT yet without involving exposure to ionizing radiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9560917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95609172022-10-15 Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging Wolharn, Lucas Guggenberger, Roman Higashigaito, Kai Sartoretti, Thomas Winklhofer, Sebastian Chung, Christine B. Finkenstaedt, Tim Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the value of zero echo time (ZTE) and gradient echo “black bone” (BB) MRI sequences for bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint (SI) using computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2019 and January 2021, 79 patients prospectively underwent clinically indicated 3-T MRI including ZTE and BB imaging. Additionally, all patients underwent a CT scan covering the SI joints within 12 months of the MRI examination. Two blinded readers performed bone assessment by grading each side of each SI joint qualitatively in terms of seven features (osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, erosions, ankylosis, joint irregularity, joint widening, and gas in the SI joint) using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = no changes–3 = marked changes). Scores were compared between all three imaging modalities. RESULTS: Interreader agreement was largely good (k values: 0.5–0.83). Except for the feature “gas in SI joint” where ZTE exhibited significantly lower scores than CT (p < 0.001), ZTE and BB showed similar performance relative to CT for all other features (p > 0.52) with inter-modality agreement being substantial to almost perfect (Krippendorff’s alpha coefficients: 0.724–0.983). When combining the data from all features except for gas in the SI joint and when binarizing grading scores, combined sensitivity/specificity was 76.7%/98.6% for ZTE and 80.8%/99.1% for BB, respectively, compared to CT. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of ZTE and BB sequences was comparable to CT for bone assessment of the SI joint. These sequences may potentially serve as an alternative to CT yet without involving exposure to ionizing radiation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9560917/ /pubmed/35773420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04097-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Wolharn, Lucas
Guggenberger, Roman
Higashigaito, Kai
Sartoretti, Thomas
Winklhofer, Sebastian
Chung, Christine B.
Finkenstaedt, Tim
Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging
title Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort detailed bone assessment of the sacroiliac joint in a prospective imaging study: comparison between computed tomography, zero echo time, and black bone magnetic resonance imaging
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04097-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wolharnlucas detailedboneassessmentofthesacroiliacjointinaprospectiveimagingstudycomparisonbetweencomputedtomographyzeroechotimeandblackbonemagneticresonanceimaging
AT guggenbergerroman detailedboneassessmentofthesacroiliacjointinaprospectiveimagingstudycomparisonbetweencomputedtomographyzeroechotimeandblackbonemagneticresonanceimaging
AT higashigaitokai detailedboneassessmentofthesacroiliacjointinaprospectiveimagingstudycomparisonbetweencomputedtomographyzeroechotimeandblackbonemagneticresonanceimaging
AT sartorettithomas detailedboneassessmentofthesacroiliacjointinaprospectiveimagingstudycomparisonbetweencomputedtomographyzeroechotimeandblackbonemagneticresonanceimaging
AT winklhofersebastian detailedboneassessmentofthesacroiliacjointinaprospectiveimagingstudycomparisonbetweencomputedtomographyzeroechotimeandblackbonemagneticresonanceimaging
AT chungchristineb detailedboneassessmentofthesacroiliacjointinaprospectiveimagingstudycomparisonbetweencomputedtomographyzeroechotimeandblackbonemagneticresonanceimaging
AT finkenstaedttim detailedboneassessmentofthesacroiliacjointinaprospectiveimagingstudycomparisonbetweencomputedtomographyzeroechotimeandblackbonemagneticresonanceimaging