Cargando…
Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score
BACKGROUND: We identified risk factors, derived and validated a prognostic score for poor neurological outcome and death for use in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). METHODS: We performed an international multicenter retrospective study including consecutive patients with CVT from January 2015 to De...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Stroke Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9561213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221944 http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.01606 |
_version_ | 1784807901133537280 |
---|---|
author | Klein, Piers Shu, Liqi Nguyen, Thanh N. Siegler, James E. Omran, Setareh Salehi Simpkins, Alexis N. Heldner, Mirjam de Havenon, Adam Aparicio, Hugo J. Abdalkader, Mohamad Psychogios, Marios Vedovati, Maria Cristina Paciaroni, Maurizio von Martial, Rascha Liebeskind, David S. de Sousa, Diana Aguiar Coutinho, Jonathan M. Yaghi, Shadi |
author_facet | Klein, Piers Shu, Liqi Nguyen, Thanh N. Siegler, James E. Omran, Setareh Salehi Simpkins, Alexis N. Heldner, Mirjam de Havenon, Adam Aparicio, Hugo J. Abdalkader, Mohamad Psychogios, Marios Vedovati, Maria Cristina Paciaroni, Maurizio von Martial, Rascha Liebeskind, David S. de Sousa, Diana Aguiar Coutinho, Jonathan M. Yaghi, Shadi |
author_sort | Klein, Piers |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We identified risk factors, derived and validated a prognostic score for poor neurological outcome and death for use in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). METHODS: We performed an international multicenter retrospective study including consecutive patients with CVT from January 2015 to December 2020. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to determine risk factors for poor outcome, mRS 3-6. A prognostic score was derived and validated. RESULTS: A total of 1,025 patients were analyzed with median 375 days (interquartile range [IQR], 180 to 747) of follow-up. The median age was 44 (IQR, 32 to 58) and 62.7% were female. Multivariable analysis revealed the following factors were associated with poor outcome at 90- day follow-up: active cancer (odds ratio [OR], 11.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.62 to 27.14; P<0.001), age (OR, 1.02 per year; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.04; P=0.039), Black race (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.27; P=0.025), encephalopathy or coma on presentation (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.39 to 5.30; P=0.004), decreased hemoglobin (OR, 1.16 per g/dL; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.31; P=0.014), higher NIHSS on presentation (OR, 1.07 per point; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.11; P=0.002), and substance use (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.71; P=0.017). The derived IN-REvASC score outperformed ISCVT-RS for the prediction of poor outcome at 90-day follow-up (area under the curve [AUC], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.87] vs. AUC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.76], χ(2) P<0.001) and mortality (AUC, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90] vs. AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.79], χ(2) P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Seven factors were associated with poor neurological outcome following CVT. The INREvASC score increased prognostic accuracy compared to ISCVT-RS. Determining patients at highest risk of poor outcome in CVT could help in clinical decision making and identify patients for targeted therapy in future clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9561213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Stroke Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95612132022-10-19 Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score Klein, Piers Shu, Liqi Nguyen, Thanh N. Siegler, James E. Omran, Setareh Salehi Simpkins, Alexis N. Heldner, Mirjam de Havenon, Adam Aparicio, Hugo J. Abdalkader, Mohamad Psychogios, Marios Vedovati, Maria Cristina Paciaroni, Maurizio von Martial, Rascha Liebeskind, David S. de Sousa, Diana Aguiar Coutinho, Jonathan M. Yaghi, Shadi J Stroke Original Article BACKGROUND: We identified risk factors, derived and validated a prognostic score for poor neurological outcome and death for use in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). METHODS: We performed an international multicenter retrospective study including consecutive patients with CVT from January 2015 to December 2020. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to determine risk factors for poor outcome, mRS 3-6. A prognostic score was derived and validated. RESULTS: A total of 1,025 patients were analyzed with median 375 days (interquartile range [IQR], 180 to 747) of follow-up. The median age was 44 (IQR, 32 to 58) and 62.7% were female. Multivariable analysis revealed the following factors were associated with poor outcome at 90- day follow-up: active cancer (odds ratio [OR], 11.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.62 to 27.14; P<0.001), age (OR, 1.02 per year; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.04; P=0.039), Black race (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.27; P=0.025), encephalopathy or coma on presentation (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.39 to 5.30; P=0.004), decreased hemoglobin (OR, 1.16 per g/dL; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.31; P=0.014), higher NIHSS on presentation (OR, 1.07 per point; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.11; P=0.002), and substance use (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.71; P=0.017). The derived IN-REvASC score outperformed ISCVT-RS for the prediction of poor outcome at 90-day follow-up (area under the curve [AUC], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.87] vs. AUC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.76], χ(2) P<0.001) and mortality (AUC, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90] vs. AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.79], χ(2) P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Seven factors were associated with poor neurological outcome following CVT. The INREvASC score increased prognostic accuracy compared to ISCVT-RS. Determining patients at highest risk of poor outcome in CVT could help in clinical decision making and identify patients for targeted therapy in future clinical trials. Korean Stroke Society 2022-09 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9561213/ /pubmed/36221944 http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.01606 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Stroke Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Klein, Piers Shu, Liqi Nguyen, Thanh N. Siegler, James E. Omran, Setareh Salehi Simpkins, Alexis N. Heldner, Mirjam de Havenon, Adam Aparicio, Hugo J. Abdalkader, Mohamad Psychogios, Marios Vedovati, Maria Cristina Paciaroni, Maurizio von Martial, Rascha Liebeskind, David S. de Sousa, Diana Aguiar Coutinho, Jonathan M. Yaghi, Shadi Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score |
title | Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score |
title_full | Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score |
title_fullStr | Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score |
title_short | Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score |
title_sort | outcome prediction in cerebral venous thrombosis: the in-revasc score |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9561213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221944 http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.01606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleinpiers outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT shuliqi outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT nguyenthanhn outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT sieglerjamese outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT omransetarehsalehi outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT simpkinsalexisn outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT heldnermirjam outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT dehavenonadam outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT apariciohugoj outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT abdalkadermohamad outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT psychogiosmarios outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT vedovatimariacristina outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT paciaronimaurizio outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT vonmartialrascha outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT liebeskinddavids outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT desousadianaaguiar outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT coutinhojonathanm outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT yaghishadi outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore AT outcomepredictionincerebralvenousthrombosistheinrevascscore |