Cargando…

Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy

We reviewed the current state of knowledge regarding visual function and its suitability as part of medical examinations for driving licenses. We focused only on Group 1 drivers. According to previous studies, visual acuity, which is the most common test, is weakly associated with a higher risk of r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobal, Nina, Hawlina, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9561926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.927712
_version_ 1784808056225267712
author Kobal, Nina
Hawlina, Marko
author_facet Kobal, Nina
Hawlina, Marko
author_sort Kobal, Nina
collection PubMed
description We reviewed the current state of knowledge regarding visual function and its suitability as part of medical examinations for driving licenses. We focused only on Group 1 drivers. According to previous studies, visual acuity, which is the most common test, is weakly associated with a higher risk of road accidents, with a greater role of visual field. The inclusion of the visual field test in medical examinations is therefore important, but the actual limit value is still unclear and further research in specific situations is needed. Color vision impairment was not found a threat to traffic safety. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and is affected by abnormal eye conditions. Resulting glare can lead to an increased risk of traffic accidents during night driving in the elderly and others with conditions that impair contrast sensitivity. However, the universal cut-off limits have not been established either. The current European Union (EU) regulations therefore reflect minimum common denominator across the member states which may not entirely translate to optimal driving safety. Due to these open questions, standardized testing in simulators or on polygons that simulate real life conditions would be needed to better determine safe limits of visual function in different conditions. As there is a need to have better standardization across Europe regarding the requirements and rules regarding driving licenses in European countries, we first analyzed existing rules and compared them with each other, also in terms of deviations from the EU directive itself. We reviewed the literature in this field and prepared proposals for a more optimal regulation of the rules in the future. Particular attention is paid to the new method of examining the visual field that was created to respect the European directive. The paper can serve as a basis of information for research teams to design further protocols, as it gathers research findings to date on the importance and impact of various visual functions on driving safety, as well as a starting point for a debate on revising existing rules for obtaining and maintaining licenses, as it compares the current regulations in European countries and differences between them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9561926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95619262022-10-15 Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy Kobal, Nina Hawlina, Marko Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience We reviewed the current state of knowledge regarding visual function and its suitability as part of medical examinations for driving licenses. We focused only on Group 1 drivers. According to previous studies, visual acuity, which is the most common test, is weakly associated with a higher risk of road accidents, with a greater role of visual field. The inclusion of the visual field test in medical examinations is therefore important, but the actual limit value is still unclear and further research in specific situations is needed. Color vision impairment was not found a threat to traffic safety. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and is affected by abnormal eye conditions. Resulting glare can lead to an increased risk of traffic accidents during night driving in the elderly and others with conditions that impair contrast sensitivity. However, the universal cut-off limits have not been established either. The current European Union (EU) regulations therefore reflect minimum common denominator across the member states which may not entirely translate to optimal driving safety. Due to these open questions, standardized testing in simulators or on polygons that simulate real life conditions would be needed to better determine safe limits of visual function in different conditions. As there is a need to have better standardization across Europe regarding the requirements and rules regarding driving licenses in European countries, we first analyzed existing rules and compared them with each other, also in terms of deviations from the EU directive itself. We reviewed the literature in this field and prepared proposals for a more optimal regulation of the rules in the future. Particular attention is paid to the new method of examining the visual field that was created to respect the European directive. The paper can serve as a basis of information for research teams to design further protocols, as it gathers research findings to date on the importance and impact of various visual functions on driving safety, as well as a starting point for a debate on revising existing rules for obtaining and maintaining licenses, as it compares the current regulations in European countries and differences between them. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9561926/ /pubmed/36248691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.927712 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kobal and Hawlina. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kobal, Nina
Hawlina, Marko
Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy
title Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy
title_full Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy
title_fullStr Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy
title_short Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy
title_sort comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different european countries and some open questions on their adequacy
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9561926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.927712
work_keys_str_mv AT kobalnina comparisonofvisualrequirementsandregulationsforobtainingadrivinglicenseindifferenteuropeancountriesandsomeopenquestionsontheiradequacy
AT hawlinamarko comparisonofvisualrequirementsandregulationsforobtainingadrivinglicenseindifferenteuropeancountriesandsomeopenquestionsontheiradequacy