Cargando…
Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
BACKGROUND: The present work evaluated how Peking prognostic score (PPS), the new prognostic index determined according to sarcopenia and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), was a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) who received hepatectomy. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.976364 |
_version_ | 1784808082456444928 |
---|---|
author | Xiong, Jianping Wu, Yunzi Hu, Haitao Kang, Wenzhe Li, Yang Jin, Peng Shao, Xinxin Li, Weikun Xie, Yibin Tian, Yantao |
author_facet | Xiong, Jianping Wu, Yunzi Hu, Haitao Kang, Wenzhe Li, Yang Jin, Peng Shao, Xinxin Li, Weikun Xie, Yibin Tian, Yantao |
author_sort | Xiong, Jianping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present work evaluated how Peking prognostic score (PPS), the new prognostic index determined according to sarcopenia and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), was a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) who received hepatectomy. METHODS: This work extracted information about patients with GCLM who underwent hepatectomy from June 2012 to May 2018. The PPS of the patients was calculated from sarcopenia status and LCR before surgery, and patients were then divided into three groups based on their PPS. This work also carried out univariate and multivariate analyses for identifying variables that were linked with overall survival (OS) together with recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy among three groups according to PPS. RESULTS: This work included 108 GCLM cases who received hepatectomy. All cases were classified into 3 groups, i.e., 26 (24.1%), 48 (44.4%), and 34 (31.5%) in groups 0–2, separately. PPS exhibited positive relation with age (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI; p = 0.012), and liver metastasis number. The relapse rate after hepatectomy in patients with GCLM was 69.4%. Additionally, the remnant liver relapse rates of groups 0–2 were 80.0, 68.7, and 53.5%. Patients in group 0 had significantly increased remnant liver relapse rates when compared with those in groups 0 and 1. PPS was significantly related to relapse patterns (p = 0.003). Relative to group 0, those of the other 2 groups showed dismal OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 7.49 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001] along with RFS (HR = 3.65, 5.33 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001). As revealed by multivariate analysis, PPS independently predicted OS (p < 0.001) together with RFS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PPS could be an easy nutrition-inflammation prognostic scoring system and an independent preoperative predictor of survival for GCLM cases after hepatectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9562039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95620392022-10-15 Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy Xiong, Jianping Wu, Yunzi Hu, Haitao Kang, Wenzhe Li, Yang Jin, Peng Shao, Xinxin Li, Weikun Xie, Yibin Tian, Yantao Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: The present work evaluated how Peking prognostic score (PPS), the new prognostic index determined according to sarcopenia and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), was a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) who received hepatectomy. METHODS: This work extracted information about patients with GCLM who underwent hepatectomy from June 2012 to May 2018. The PPS of the patients was calculated from sarcopenia status and LCR before surgery, and patients were then divided into three groups based on their PPS. This work also carried out univariate and multivariate analyses for identifying variables that were linked with overall survival (OS) together with recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy among three groups according to PPS. RESULTS: This work included 108 GCLM cases who received hepatectomy. All cases were classified into 3 groups, i.e., 26 (24.1%), 48 (44.4%), and 34 (31.5%) in groups 0–2, separately. PPS exhibited positive relation with age (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI; p = 0.012), and liver metastasis number. The relapse rate after hepatectomy in patients with GCLM was 69.4%. Additionally, the remnant liver relapse rates of groups 0–2 were 80.0, 68.7, and 53.5%. Patients in group 0 had significantly increased remnant liver relapse rates when compared with those in groups 0 and 1. PPS was significantly related to relapse patterns (p = 0.003). Relative to group 0, those of the other 2 groups showed dismal OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 7.49 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001] along with RFS (HR = 3.65, 5.33 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001). As revealed by multivariate analysis, PPS independently predicted OS (p < 0.001) together with RFS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PPS could be an easy nutrition-inflammation prognostic scoring system and an independent preoperative predictor of survival for GCLM cases after hepatectomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9562039/ /pubmed/36245530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.976364 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiong, Wu, Hu, Kang, Li, Jin, Shao, Li, Xie and Tian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Xiong, Jianping Wu, Yunzi Hu, Haitao Kang, Wenzhe Li, Yang Jin, Peng Shao, Xinxin Li, Weikun Xie, Yibin Tian, Yantao Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy |
title | Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy |
title_full | Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy |
title_fullStr | Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy |
title_short | Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy |
title_sort | peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.976364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiongjianping pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT wuyunzi pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT huhaitao pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT kangwenzhe pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT liyang pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT jinpeng pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT shaoxinxin pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT liweikun pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT xieyibin pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy AT tianyantao pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy |