Cargando…

Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy

BACKGROUND: The present work evaluated how Peking prognostic score (PPS), the new prognostic index determined according to sarcopenia and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), was a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) who received hepatectomy. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Jianping, Wu, Yunzi, Hu, Haitao, Kang, Wenzhe, Li, Yang, Jin, Peng, Shao, Xinxin, Li, Weikun, Xie, Yibin, Tian, Yantao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.976364
_version_ 1784808082456444928
author Xiong, Jianping
Wu, Yunzi
Hu, Haitao
Kang, Wenzhe
Li, Yang
Jin, Peng
Shao, Xinxin
Li, Weikun
Xie, Yibin
Tian, Yantao
author_facet Xiong, Jianping
Wu, Yunzi
Hu, Haitao
Kang, Wenzhe
Li, Yang
Jin, Peng
Shao, Xinxin
Li, Weikun
Xie, Yibin
Tian, Yantao
author_sort Xiong, Jianping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present work evaluated how Peking prognostic score (PPS), the new prognostic index determined according to sarcopenia and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), was a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) who received hepatectomy. METHODS: This work extracted information about patients with GCLM who underwent hepatectomy from June 2012 to May 2018. The PPS of the patients was calculated from sarcopenia status and LCR before surgery, and patients were then divided into three groups based on their PPS. This work also carried out univariate and multivariate analyses for identifying variables that were linked with overall survival (OS) together with recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy among three groups according to PPS. RESULTS: This work included 108 GCLM cases who received hepatectomy. All cases were classified into 3 groups, i.e., 26 (24.1%), 48 (44.4%), and 34 (31.5%) in groups 0–2, separately. PPS exhibited positive relation with age (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI; p = 0.012), and liver metastasis number. The relapse rate after hepatectomy in patients with GCLM was 69.4%. Additionally, the remnant liver relapse rates of groups 0–2 were 80.0, 68.7, and 53.5%. Patients in group 0 had significantly increased remnant liver relapse rates when compared with those in groups 0 and 1. PPS was significantly related to relapse patterns (p = 0.003). Relative to group 0, those of the other 2 groups showed dismal OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 7.49 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001] along with RFS (HR = 3.65, 5.33 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001). As revealed by multivariate analysis, PPS independently predicted OS (p < 0.001) together with RFS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PPS could be an easy nutrition-inflammation prognostic scoring system and an independent preoperative predictor of survival for GCLM cases after hepatectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9562039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95620392022-10-15 Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy Xiong, Jianping Wu, Yunzi Hu, Haitao Kang, Wenzhe Li, Yang Jin, Peng Shao, Xinxin Li, Weikun Xie, Yibin Tian, Yantao Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: The present work evaluated how Peking prognostic score (PPS), the new prognostic index determined according to sarcopenia and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), was a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) who received hepatectomy. METHODS: This work extracted information about patients with GCLM who underwent hepatectomy from June 2012 to May 2018. The PPS of the patients was calculated from sarcopenia status and LCR before surgery, and patients were then divided into three groups based on their PPS. This work also carried out univariate and multivariate analyses for identifying variables that were linked with overall survival (OS) together with recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy among three groups according to PPS. RESULTS: This work included 108 GCLM cases who received hepatectomy. All cases were classified into 3 groups, i.e., 26 (24.1%), 48 (44.4%), and 34 (31.5%) in groups 0–2, separately. PPS exhibited positive relation with age (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI; p = 0.012), and liver metastasis number. The relapse rate after hepatectomy in patients with GCLM was 69.4%. Additionally, the remnant liver relapse rates of groups 0–2 were 80.0, 68.7, and 53.5%. Patients in group 0 had significantly increased remnant liver relapse rates when compared with those in groups 0 and 1. PPS was significantly related to relapse patterns (p = 0.003). Relative to group 0, those of the other 2 groups showed dismal OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 7.49 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001] along with RFS (HR = 3.65, 5.33 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001). As revealed by multivariate analysis, PPS independently predicted OS (p < 0.001) together with RFS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PPS could be an easy nutrition-inflammation prognostic scoring system and an independent preoperative predictor of survival for GCLM cases after hepatectomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9562039/ /pubmed/36245530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.976364 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiong, Wu, Hu, Kang, Li, Jin, Shao, Li, Xie and Tian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Xiong, Jianping
Wu, Yunzi
Hu, Haitao
Kang, Wenzhe
Li, Yang
Jin, Peng
Shao, Xinxin
Li, Weikun
Xie, Yibin
Tian, Yantao
Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
title Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
title_full Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
title_fullStr Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
title_short Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
title_sort peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.976364
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongjianping pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT wuyunzi pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT huhaitao pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT kangwenzhe pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT liyang pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT jinpeng pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT shaoxinxin pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT liweikun pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT xieyibin pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy
AT tianyantao pekingprognosticscoreisausefulprognosticfactorinpatientswithgastriccancerlivermetastasesreceivinghepatectomy