Cargando…

Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based brain segmentation has recently been revolutionized by deep learning methods. These methods use large numbers of annotated segmentations to train algorithms that have the potential to perform brain segmentations reliably and quickly. However, training data for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rushmore, R. Jarrett, Sunderland, Kyle, Carrington, Holly, Chen, Justine, Halle, Michael, Lasso, Andras, Papadimitriou, G., Prunier, N., Rizzoni, Elizabeth, Vessey, Brynn, Wilson-Braun, Peter, Rathi, Yogesh, Kubicki, Marek, Bouix, Sylvain, Yeterian, Edward, Makris, Nikos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2022.894606
_version_ 1784808100785553408
author Rushmore, R. Jarrett
Sunderland, Kyle
Carrington, Holly
Chen, Justine
Halle, Michael
Lasso, Andras
Papadimitriou, G.
Prunier, N.
Rizzoni, Elizabeth
Vessey, Brynn
Wilson-Braun, Peter
Rathi, Yogesh
Kubicki, Marek
Bouix, Sylvain
Yeterian, Edward
Makris, Nikos
author_facet Rushmore, R. Jarrett
Sunderland, Kyle
Carrington, Holly
Chen, Justine
Halle, Michael
Lasso, Andras
Papadimitriou, G.
Prunier, N.
Rizzoni, Elizabeth
Vessey, Brynn
Wilson-Braun, Peter
Rathi, Yogesh
Kubicki, Marek
Bouix, Sylvain
Yeterian, Edward
Makris, Nikos
author_sort Rushmore, R. Jarrett
collection PubMed
description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based brain segmentation has recently been revolutionized by deep learning methods. These methods use large numbers of annotated segmentations to train algorithms that have the potential to perform brain segmentations reliably and quickly. However, training data for these algorithms are frequently obtained from automated brain segmentation systems, which may contain inaccurate neuroanatomy. Thus, the neuroimaging community would benefit from an open source database of high quality, neuroanatomically curated and manually edited MRI brain images, as well as the publicly available tools and detailed procedures for generating these curated data. Manual segmentation approaches are regarded as the gold standard for brain segmentation and parcellation. These approaches underpin the construction of neuroanatomically accurate human brain atlases. In addition, neuroanatomically precise definitions of MRI-based regions of interest (ROIs) derived from manual brain segmentation are essential for accuracy in structural connectivity studies and in surgical planning for procedures such as deep brain stimulation. However, manual segmentation procedures are time and labor intensive, and not practical in studies utilizing very large datasets, large cohorts, or multimodal imaging. Automated segmentation methods were developed to overcome these issues, and provide high data throughput, increased reliability, and multimodal imaging capability. These methods utilize manually labeled brain atlases to automatically parcellate the brain into different ROIs, but do not have the anatomical accuracy of skilled manual segmentation approaches. In the present study, we developed a custom software module for manual editing of brain structures in the freely available 3D Slicer software platform that employs principles and tools based on pioneering work from the Center for Morphometric Analysis (CMA) at Massachusetts General Hospital. We used these novel 3D Slicer segmentation tools and techniques in conjunction with well-established neuroanatomical definitions of subcortical brain structures to manually segment 50 high resolution T1w MRI brains from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) Young Adult database. The structural definitions used herein are associated with specific neuroanatomical ontologies to systematically interrelate histological and MRI-based morphometric definitions. The resulting brain datasets are publicly available and will provide the basis for a larger database of anatomically curated brains as an open science resource.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9562126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95621262022-10-15 Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach Rushmore, R. Jarrett Sunderland, Kyle Carrington, Holly Chen, Justine Halle, Michael Lasso, Andras Papadimitriou, G. Prunier, N. Rizzoni, Elizabeth Vessey, Brynn Wilson-Braun, Peter Rathi, Yogesh Kubicki, Marek Bouix, Sylvain Yeterian, Edward Makris, Nikos Front Neuroanat Neuroanatomy Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based brain segmentation has recently been revolutionized by deep learning methods. These methods use large numbers of annotated segmentations to train algorithms that have the potential to perform brain segmentations reliably and quickly. However, training data for these algorithms are frequently obtained from automated brain segmentation systems, which may contain inaccurate neuroanatomy. Thus, the neuroimaging community would benefit from an open source database of high quality, neuroanatomically curated and manually edited MRI brain images, as well as the publicly available tools and detailed procedures for generating these curated data. Manual segmentation approaches are regarded as the gold standard for brain segmentation and parcellation. These approaches underpin the construction of neuroanatomically accurate human brain atlases. In addition, neuroanatomically precise definitions of MRI-based regions of interest (ROIs) derived from manual brain segmentation are essential for accuracy in structural connectivity studies and in surgical planning for procedures such as deep brain stimulation. However, manual segmentation procedures are time and labor intensive, and not practical in studies utilizing very large datasets, large cohorts, or multimodal imaging. Automated segmentation methods were developed to overcome these issues, and provide high data throughput, increased reliability, and multimodal imaging capability. These methods utilize manually labeled brain atlases to automatically parcellate the brain into different ROIs, but do not have the anatomical accuracy of skilled manual segmentation approaches. In the present study, we developed a custom software module for manual editing of brain structures in the freely available 3D Slicer software platform that employs principles and tools based on pioneering work from the Center for Morphometric Analysis (CMA) at Massachusetts General Hospital. We used these novel 3D Slicer segmentation tools and techniques in conjunction with well-established neuroanatomical definitions of subcortical brain structures to manually segment 50 high resolution T1w MRI brains from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) Young Adult database. The structural definitions used herein are associated with specific neuroanatomical ontologies to systematically interrelate histological and MRI-based morphometric definitions. The resulting brain datasets are publicly available and will provide the basis for a larger database of anatomically curated brains as an open science resource. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9562126/ /pubmed/36249866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2022.894606 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rushmore, Sunderland, Carrington, Chen, Halle, Lasso, Papadimitriou, Prunier, Rizzoni, Vessey, Wilson-Braun, Rathi, Kubicki, Bouix, Yeterian and Makris. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroanatomy
Rushmore, R. Jarrett
Sunderland, Kyle
Carrington, Holly
Chen, Justine
Halle, Michael
Lasso, Andras
Papadimitriou, G.
Prunier, N.
Rizzoni, Elizabeth
Vessey, Brynn
Wilson-Braun, Peter
Rathi, Yogesh
Kubicki, Marek
Bouix, Sylvain
Yeterian, Edward
Makris, Nikos
Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach
title Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach
title_full Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach
title_fullStr Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach
title_full_unstemmed Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach
title_short Anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An open science approach
title_sort anatomically curated segmentation of human subcortical structures in high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: an open science approach
topic Neuroanatomy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2022.894606
work_keys_str_mv AT rushmorerjarrett anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT sunderlandkyle anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT carringtonholly anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT chenjustine anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT hallemichael anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT lassoandras anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT papadimitrioug anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT pruniern anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT rizzonielizabeth anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT vesseybrynn anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT wilsonbraunpeter anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT rathiyogesh anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT kubickimarek anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT bouixsylvain anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT yeterianedward anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach
AT makrisnikos anatomicallycuratedsegmentationofhumansubcorticalstructuresinhighresolutionmagneticresonanceimaginganopenscienceapproach