Cargando…
Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer
Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer causing death among females worldwide. Radiotherapy after lumpectomy/mastectomy in breast cancer cases is a successful treatment modality taking five weeks to complete. The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of hyp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36259037 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29147 |
_version_ | 1784808130981396480 |
---|---|
author | Narwariya, Abhinav Dhakar, Mhendr Jatav, Jagannath Prajapati, Raju Bayer, Sujata Moosa, Shajiya sarwar Shaikh, Mohammad habeebur raheman Ali, Mohammed Taher Ahmad, Arafat Begum, Yousuf Hiware, Sanket D |
author_facet | Narwariya, Abhinav Dhakar, Mhendr Jatav, Jagannath Prajapati, Raju Bayer, Sujata Moosa, Shajiya sarwar Shaikh, Mohammad habeebur raheman Ali, Mohammed Taher Ahmad, Arafat Begum, Yousuf Hiware, Sanket D |
author_sort | Narwariya, Abhinav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer causing death among females worldwide. Radiotherapy after lumpectomy/mastectomy in breast cancer cases is a successful treatment modality taking five weeks to complete. The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with conventional radiotherapy with respect to outcome and toxicity. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly divided equally into a conventional group, Group A (dose: 50 Gy in 25 fractions), and a hypo-fractionated short-course radiotherapy group, Group B (dose: 40 Gy in 16 fractions). After thorough clinical and laboratory examination of all patients, the disease status was assessed prior to radiotherapy and three and six months after completion of radiotherapy. The cardiopulmonary function was assessed using echocardiography and pulmonary function tests prior to the procedure. The assessment of the development of toxicity (dysphagia, skin, lung, and lymphedema) was done during every clinical visit. Results: The mean age of patients was 53.28 ± 9.73 years in Group A, and 55.67 ± 10.41 years in Group B (p=0.82). The right breast was involved in 13 (43.4%) patients in Group A and 14 (46.6%) in Group B, and the left breast was involved n 17 (56.6%) patients in Group A and 16 (53.4%) in Group B (p=0.81). Most of the patients were post-menopausal; 24 (80%) in Group A and 25 (83.4%) in Group B (p=0.91). Eleven (36.6%) patients were of stage T2N1M0 in both groups. However, no statistical difference was observed between the groups in the TNM (tumor, node, and metastasis) staging using the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) criteria (p=0.26). On comparing the responses in Group A and Group B, no significant difference was observed in either of the groups from immediate post-treatment to the 12-month follow-up period (p=0.53 and p=0.64, respectively). Conclusion: Hypo-fractionated radiotherapy is as effective as conventional radiotherapy and can be used as an alternative method for treatment following breast cancer surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9562256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95622562022-10-17 Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Narwariya, Abhinav Dhakar, Mhendr Jatav, Jagannath Prajapati, Raju Bayer, Sujata Moosa, Shajiya sarwar Shaikh, Mohammad habeebur raheman Ali, Mohammed Taher Ahmad, Arafat Begum, Yousuf Hiware, Sanket D Cureus Radiation Oncology Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer causing death among females worldwide. Radiotherapy after lumpectomy/mastectomy in breast cancer cases is a successful treatment modality taking five weeks to complete. The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with conventional radiotherapy with respect to outcome and toxicity. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly divided equally into a conventional group, Group A (dose: 50 Gy in 25 fractions), and a hypo-fractionated short-course radiotherapy group, Group B (dose: 40 Gy in 16 fractions). After thorough clinical and laboratory examination of all patients, the disease status was assessed prior to radiotherapy and three and six months after completion of radiotherapy. The cardiopulmonary function was assessed using echocardiography and pulmonary function tests prior to the procedure. The assessment of the development of toxicity (dysphagia, skin, lung, and lymphedema) was done during every clinical visit. Results: The mean age of patients was 53.28 ± 9.73 years in Group A, and 55.67 ± 10.41 years in Group B (p=0.82). The right breast was involved in 13 (43.4%) patients in Group A and 14 (46.6%) in Group B, and the left breast was involved n 17 (56.6%) patients in Group A and 16 (53.4%) in Group B (p=0.81). Most of the patients were post-menopausal; 24 (80%) in Group A and 25 (83.4%) in Group B (p=0.91). Eleven (36.6%) patients were of stage T2N1M0 in both groups. However, no statistical difference was observed between the groups in the TNM (tumor, node, and metastasis) staging using the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) criteria (p=0.26). On comparing the responses in Group A and Group B, no significant difference was observed in either of the groups from immediate post-treatment to the 12-month follow-up period (p=0.53 and p=0.64, respectively). Conclusion: Hypo-fractionated radiotherapy is as effective as conventional radiotherapy and can be used as an alternative method for treatment following breast cancer surgery. Cureus 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9562256/ /pubmed/36259037 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29147 Text en Copyright © 2022, Narwariya et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Narwariya, Abhinav Dhakar, Mhendr Jatav, Jagannath Prajapati, Raju Bayer, Sujata Moosa, Shajiya sarwar Shaikh, Mohammad habeebur raheman Ali, Mohammed Taher Ahmad, Arafat Begum, Yousuf Hiware, Sanket D Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer |
title | Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer |
title_full | Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer |
title_short | Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer |
title_sort | comparative study of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in breast cancer |
topic | Radiation Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36259037 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT narwariyaabhinav comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT dhakarmhendr comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT jatavjagannath comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT prajapatiraju comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT bayersujata comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT moosashajiyasarwar comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT shaikhmohammadhabeeburraheman comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT alimohammedtaher comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT ahmadarafat comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT begumyousuf comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer AT hiwaresanketd comparativestudyofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyinbreastcancer |