Cargando…
Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes and complications following microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for patients operated at the Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Norway, were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.100894 |
_version_ | 1784808133782142976 |
---|---|
author | Lønne, Vetle Vangen Madsbu, Mattis A. Salvesen, Øyvind Nygaard, Øystein Solberg, Tore K. Gulati, Sasha |
author_facet | Lønne, Vetle Vangen Madsbu, Mattis A. Salvesen, Øyvind Nygaard, Øystein Solberg, Tore K. Gulati, Sasha |
author_sort | Lønne, Vetle Vangen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes and complications following microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for patients operated at the Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Norway, were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery from May 2007 through July 2016. All patients underwent lumbar microdiscectomy. The primary outcome was change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at one year. Secondary endpoints were change in quality of life measured with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), back and leg pain measured with numerical rating scales (NRS), complications, and duration of surgery and hospital stays. RESULTS: 276 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 161 patients (58.3%) completed one-year follow-up. The mean improvement in ODI at one year was 27.1 points (95% CI 23.1 to 31.0, P <0.001). The mean improvement in EQ-5D at one year of 0.47 points (95% CI 0.40–0.54, P <0.001), representing a large effect size (Cohens D = 1.3). The mean improvement in back pain and leg pain NRS were 4.3 points (95% CI 2.2–3.2, P <0.001) and 3.8 points (95% CI 2.8–3.9, P <0.001), respectively. Nine patients (3.3%) experienced intraoperative complications, and 15 (5.5%) out of 160 patients reported complications within three months following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients operated for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in general report significant clinical improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9562267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95622672022-10-14 Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes Lønne, Vetle Vangen Madsbu, Mattis A. Salvesen, Øyvind Nygaard, Øystein Solberg, Tore K. Gulati, Sasha Brain Spine Article OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes and complications following microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for patients operated at the Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Norway, were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery from May 2007 through July 2016. All patients underwent lumbar microdiscectomy. The primary outcome was change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at one year. Secondary endpoints were change in quality of life measured with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), back and leg pain measured with numerical rating scales (NRS), complications, and duration of surgery and hospital stays. RESULTS: 276 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 161 patients (58.3%) completed one-year follow-up. The mean improvement in ODI at one year was 27.1 points (95% CI 23.1 to 31.0, P <0.001). The mean improvement in EQ-5D at one year of 0.47 points (95% CI 0.40–0.54, P <0.001), representing a large effect size (Cohens D = 1.3). The mean improvement in back pain and leg pain NRS were 4.3 points (95% CI 2.2–3.2, P <0.001) and 3.8 points (95% CI 2.8–3.9, P <0.001), respectively. Nine patients (3.3%) experienced intraoperative complications, and 15 (5.5%) out of 160 patients reported complications within three months following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients operated for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in general report significant clinical improvement. Elsevier 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9562267/ /pubmed/36248117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.100894 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lønne, Vetle Vangen Madsbu, Mattis A. Salvesen, Øyvind Nygaard, Øystein Solberg, Tore K. Gulati, Sasha Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes |
title | Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes |
title_full | Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes |
title_fullStr | Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes |
title_short | Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes |
title_sort | is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? a single center observational study with patient reported outcomes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.100894 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lønnevetlevangen issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes AT madsbumattisa issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes AT salvesenøyvind issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes AT nygaardøystein issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes AT solbergtorek issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes AT gulatisasha issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes |