Cargando…

Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes and complications following microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for patients operated at the Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Norway, were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lønne, Vetle Vangen, Madsbu, Mattis A., Salvesen, Øyvind, Nygaard, Øystein, Solberg, Tore K., Gulati, Sasha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.100894
_version_ 1784808133782142976
author Lønne, Vetle Vangen
Madsbu, Mattis A.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Nygaard, Øystein
Solberg, Tore K.
Gulati, Sasha
author_facet Lønne, Vetle Vangen
Madsbu, Mattis A.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Nygaard, Øystein
Solberg, Tore K.
Gulati, Sasha
author_sort Lønne, Vetle Vangen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes and complications following microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for patients operated at the Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Norway, were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery from May 2007 through July 2016. All patients underwent lumbar microdiscectomy. The primary outcome was change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at one year. Secondary endpoints were change in quality of life measured with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), back and leg pain measured with numerical rating scales (NRS), complications, and duration of surgery and hospital stays. RESULTS: 276 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 161 patients (58.3%) completed one-year follow-up. The mean improvement in ODI at one year was 27.1 points (95% CI 23.1 to 31.0, P <0.001). The mean improvement in EQ-5D at one year of 0.47 points (95% CI 0.40–0.54, P <0.001), representing a large effect size (Cohens D ​= ​1.3). The mean improvement in back pain and leg pain NRS were 4.3 points (95% CI 2.2–3.2, P <0.001) and 3.8 points (95% CI 2.8–3.9, P <0.001), respectively. Nine patients (3.3%) experienced intraoperative complications, and 15 (5.5%) out of 160 patients reported complications within three months following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients operated for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in general report significant clinical improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9562267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95622672022-10-14 Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes Lønne, Vetle Vangen Madsbu, Mattis A. Salvesen, Øyvind Nygaard, Øystein Solberg, Tore K. Gulati, Sasha Brain Spine Article OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes and complications following microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for patients operated at the Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Norway, were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery from May 2007 through July 2016. All patients underwent lumbar microdiscectomy. The primary outcome was change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at one year. Secondary endpoints were change in quality of life measured with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), back and leg pain measured with numerical rating scales (NRS), complications, and duration of surgery and hospital stays. RESULTS: 276 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 161 patients (58.3%) completed one-year follow-up. The mean improvement in ODI at one year was 27.1 points (95% CI 23.1 to 31.0, P <0.001). The mean improvement in EQ-5D at one year of 0.47 points (95% CI 0.40–0.54, P <0.001), representing a large effect size (Cohens D ​= ​1.3). The mean improvement in back pain and leg pain NRS were 4.3 points (95% CI 2.2–3.2, P <0.001) and 3.8 points (95% CI 2.8–3.9, P <0.001), respectively. Nine patients (3.3%) experienced intraoperative complications, and 15 (5.5%) out of 160 patients reported complications within three months following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients operated for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in general report significant clinical improvement. Elsevier 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9562267/ /pubmed/36248117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.100894 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lønne, Vetle Vangen
Madsbu, Mattis A.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Nygaard, Øystein
Solberg, Tore K.
Gulati, Sasha
Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
title Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
title_full Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
title_fullStr Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
title_short Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
title_sort is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? a single center observational study with patient reported outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.100894
work_keys_str_mv AT lønnevetlevangen issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT madsbumattisa issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT salvesenøyvind issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT nygaardøystein issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT solbergtorek issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT gulatisasha issurgeryforrecurrentlumbardischerniationworthwhileorfutileasinglecenterobservationalstudywithpatientreportedoutcomes