Cargando…
Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review
OBJECTIVE: Accurate reporting of birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is essential. Mobile health (mHealth) tools have been proposed as a replacement for conventional paper-based registers. mHealth could provide timely data for individual facilities and health departments...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063886 |
_version_ | 1784808142141390848 |
---|---|
author | Cansdale, Lottie Grace Kelly, Gabriella Khashan, Ali Malata, Address Kachale, Fannie Lissauer, David Yosefe, Simeon Roberts, James Woodworth, Simon Mmbaga, Blandina Redman, Christopher Hirst, Jane Elizabeth |
author_facet | Cansdale, Lottie Grace Kelly, Gabriella Khashan, Ali Malata, Address Kachale, Fannie Lissauer, David Yosefe, Simeon Roberts, James Woodworth, Simon Mmbaga, Blandina Redman, Christopher Hirst, Jane Elizabeth |
author_sort | Cansdale, Lottie Grace |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Accurate reporting of birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is essential. Mobile health (mHealth) tools have been proposed as a replacement for conventional paper-based registers. mHealth could provide timely data for individual facilities and health departments, as well as capture deliveries outside facilities. This scoping review evaluates which mHealth tools have been reported to birth outcomes in the delivering room in LMICs and documents their reported advantages and drawbacks. DESIGN: A scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and the mHealth evidence reporting and assessment checklist for evaluating mHealth interventions. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL and Global Health were searched for records until 3 February 2022 with no earliest date limit. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included where healthcare workers used mHealth tools in LMICs to record birth outcomes. Exclusion criteria included mHealth not being used at the point of delivery, non-peer reviewed literature and studies not written in English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Common themes among studies were identified. RESULTS: 640 records were screened, 21 of which met the inclusion criteria, describing 15 different mHealth tools. We identified six themes: (1) digital tools for labour monitoring (8 studies); (2) digital data collection of specific birth outcomes (3 studies); (3) digital technologies used in community settings (6 studies); (4) attitudes of healthcare workers (10 studies); (5) paper versus electronic data collection (3 studies) and (6) infrastructure, interoperability and sustainability (8 studies). CONCLUSION: Several mHealth technologies are reported to have the capability to record birth outcomes at delivery, but none were identified that were designed solely for that purpose. Use of digital delivery registers appears feasible and acceptable to healthcare workers, but definitive evaluations are lacking. Further assessment of the sustainability of technologies and their ability to integrate with existing health information systems is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9562304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95623042022-10-15 Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review Cansdale, Lottie Grace Kelly, Gabriella Khashan, Ali Malata, Address Kachale, Fannie Lissauer, David Yosefe, Simeon Roberts, James Woodworth, Simon Mmbaga, Blandina Redman, Christopher Hirst, Jane Elizabeth BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: Accurate reporting of birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is essential. Mobile health (mHealth) tools have been proposed as a replacement for conventional paper-based registers. mHealth could provide timely data for individual facilities and health departments, as well as capture deliveries outside facilities. This scoping review evaluates which mHealth tools have been reported to birth outcomes in the delivering room in LMICs and documents their reported advantages and drawbacks. DESIGN: A scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and the mHealth evidence reporting and assessment checklist for evaluating mHealth interventions. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL and Global Health were searched for records until 3 February 2022 with no earliest date limit. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included where healthcare workers used mHealth tools in LMICs to record birth outcomes. Exclusion criteria included mHealth not being used at the point of delivery, non-peer reviewed literature and studies not written in English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Common themes among studies were identified. RESULTS: 640 records were screened, 21 of which met the inclusion criteria, describing 15 different mHealth tools. We identified six themes: (1) digital tools for labour monitoring (8 studies); (2) digital data collection of specific birth outcomes (3 studies); (3) digital technologies used in community settings (6 studies); (4) attitudes of healthcare workers (10 studies); (5) paper versus electronic data collection (3 studies) and (6) infrastructure, interoperability and sustainability (8 studies). CONCLUSION: Several mHealth technologies are reported to have the capability to record birth outcomes at delivery, but none were identified that were designed solely for that purpose. Use of digital delivery registers appears feasible and acceptable to healthcare workers, but definitive evaluations are lacking. Further assessment of the sustainability of technologies and their ability to integrate with existing health information systems is needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9562304/ /pubmed/36223965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063886 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Global Health Cansdale, Lottie Grace Kelly, Gabriella Khashan, Ali Malata, Address Kachale, Fannie Lissauer, David Yosefe, Simeon Roberts, James Woodworth, Simon Mmbaga, Blandina Redman, Christopher Hirst, Jane Elizabeth Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title | Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_full | Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_short | Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_sort | use of mhealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063886 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cansdalelottiegrace useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT kellygabriella useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT khashanali useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT malataaddress useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT kachalefannie useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT lissauerdavid useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT yosefesimeon useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT robertsjames useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT woodworthsimon useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT mmbagablandina useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT redmanchristopher useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT hirstjaneelizabeth useofmhealthtoolstoregisterbirthoutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview |