Cargando…

Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: An impoverished medical workforce is a global phenomenon, which can impact patient care significantly. Greater flexibility in working patterns is one approach policy-makers adopt to address this issue, and the expansion of less than full-time (LTFT) working forms part of this. Studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Magdalen, Griffin, Ann, Dacre, Jane, Medisauskaite, Asta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062356
_version_ 1784808145816649728
author Baker, Magdalen
Griffin, Ann
Dacre, Jane
Medisauskaite, Asta
author_facet Baker, Magdalen
Griffin, Ann
Dacre, Jane
Medisauskaite, Asta
author_sort Baker, Magdalen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: An impoverished medical workforce is a global phenomenon, which can impact patient care significantly. Greater flexibility in working patterns is one approach policy-makers adopt to address this issue, and the expansion of less than full-time (LTFT) working forms part of this. Studies suggest that LTFT working has the potential to improve recruitment and retention by aligning with how doctors increasingly want to balance their careers with other commitments and interests. What is less well understood are the influencing factors and outcomes related to LTFT working among doctors. This protocol outlines the methodology for a systematic review that will evaluate existing knowledge on LTFT working in the medical profession. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines will be followed. Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Healthcare Administration, and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts will be searched for studies published up to March 2022. Unpublished literature from EThos and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global will also be searched. Bibliographic searching, citation searching and handsearching will be used to retrieve additional papers. Authors will be contacted for data or publications if necessary. Two independent reviewers will undertake study screening, data extraction and quality assessment, with disagreements resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer if necessary. Data synthesis will be by narrative synthesis and meta-analysis if possible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed study does not require ethical approval; however, it forms part of a larger body of research on the impact of LTFT working on the medical workforce for which ethics approval has been granted by the Research Ethics Committee at University College London. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022307174.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9562320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95623202022-10-15 Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol Baker, Magdalen Griffin, Ann Dacre, Jane Medisauskaite, Asta BMJ Open Medical Education and Training INTRODUCTION: An impoverished medical workforce is a global phenomenon, which can impact patient care significantly. Greater flexibility in working patterns is one approach policy-makers adopt to address this issue, and the expansion of less than full-time (LTFT) working forms part of this. Studies suggest that LTFT working has the potential to improve recruitment and retention by aligning with how doctors increasingly want to balance their careers with other commitments and interests. What is less well understood are the influencing factors and outcomes related to LTFT working among doctors. This protocol outlines the methodology for a systematic review that will evaluate existing knowledge on LTFT working in the medical profession. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines will be followed. Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Healthcare Administration, and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts will be searched for studies published up to March 2022. Unpublished literature from EThos and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global will also be searched. Bibliographic searching, citation searching and handsearching will be used to retrieve additional papers. Authors will be contacted for data or publications if necessary. Two independent reviewers will undertake study screening, data extraction and quality assessment, with disagreements resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer if necessary. Data synthesis will be by narrative synthesis and meta-analysis if possible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed study does not require ethical approval; however, it forms part of a larger body of research on the impact of LTFT working on the medical workforce for which ethics approval has been granted by the Research Ethics Committee at University College London. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022307174. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9562320/ /pubmed/36229152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062356 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Baker, Magdalen
Griffin, Ann
Dacre, Jane
Medisauskaite, Asta
Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol
title Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol
title_full Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol
title_short Influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol
title_sort influences and outcomes of less than full-time working in the medical profession: a systematic review protocol
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062356
work_keys_str_mv AT bakermagdalen influencesandoutcomesoflessthanfulltimeworkinginthemedicalprofessionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT griffinann influencesandoutcomesoflessthanfulltimeworkinginthemedicalprofessionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT dacrejane influencesandoutcomesoflessthanfulltimeworkinginthemedicalprofessionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT medisauskaiteasta influencesandoutcomesoflessthanfulltimeworkinginthemedicalprofessionasystematicreviewprotocol