Cargando…
Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale
PURPOSE: To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. PARTICIPANTS: Paired...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100029 |
_version_ | 1784808148205305856 |
---|---|
author | Domalpally, Amitha Barrett, Nancy Reimers, James Blodi, Barbara |
author_facet | Domalpally, Amitha Barrett, Nancy Reimers, James Blodi, Barbara |
author_sort | Domalpally, Amitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. PARTICIPANTS: Paired images from 192 eyes (189 participants) with diabetic retinopathy were included. METHODS: The ETDRS levels were determined by masked graders in 3 ways: standard 7-field imaging, UWF within the 7-field region (7-field UWF imaging), and the entire UWF image (global ETDRS imaging). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage agreement between 7-field and UWF imaging for ETDRS levels. RESULTS: Of the 166 paired images evaluated, exact agreement was found in 48.8% of eyes between standard 7-field and 7-field UWF ETDRS levels with a weighted κ value of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–0.68). Agreement rates varied with DR severity and were least in early DR (30.8%) and moderate nonproliferative DR (26.5%) groups. In 156 eyes with 7-field UWF ETDRS and global UWF ETDRS levels, exact agreement was found in 143 eyes (92%), with a weighted κ value of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9–0.98). The peripheral lesions contributed to a higher DR severity in 8% and changed the eye to a proliferative DR level in 2%. Reproducibility of the 3 ETDRS evaluations was comparable with a weighted κ value of 0.57 with standard 7-field imaging, 0.65 with 7-field UWF imaging, and 0.60 with global ETDRS scale imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found in the ETDRS DR severity scale between standard 7-field and UWF imaging, indicating caution in interchanging data from the 2 methods. Both methods showed good reproducibility for clinical trial outcome of 2-step change. The global ETDRS scale provides a comprehensive score to incorporate peripheral changes into the ETDRS scale. The implications of the global scale on progression rate are yet to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9562330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95623302022-10-14 Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale Domalpally, Amitha Barrett, Nancy Reimers, James Blodi, Barbara Ophthalmol Sci Original Article PURPOSE: To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. PARTICIPANTS: Paired images from 192 eyes (189 participants) with diabetic retinopathy were included. METHODS: The ETDRS levels were determined by masked graders in 3 ways: standard 7-field imaging, UWF within the 7-field region (7-field UWF imaging), and the entire UWF image (global ETDRS imaging). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage agreement between 7-field and UWF imaging for ETDRS levels. RESULTS: Of the 166 paired images evaluated, exact agreement was found in 48.8% of eyes between standard 7-field and 7-field UWF ETDRS levels with a weighted κ value of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–0.68). Agreement rates varied with DR severity and were least in early DR (30.8%) and moderate nonproliferative DR (26.5%) groups. In 156 eyes with 7-field UWF ETDRS and global UWF ETDRS levels, exact agreement was found in 143 eyes (92%), with a weighted κ value of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9–0.98). The peripheral lesions contributed to a higher DR severity in 8% and changed the eye to a proliferative DR level in 2%. Reproducibility of the 3 ETDRS evaluations was comparable with a weighted κ value of 0.57 with standard 7-field imaging, 0.65 with 7-field UWF imaging, and 0.60 with global ETDRS scale imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found in the ETDRS DR severity scale between standard 7-field and UWF imaging, indicating caution in interchanging data from the 2 methods. Both methods showed good reproducibility for clinical trial outcome of 2-step change. The global ETDRS scale provides a comprehensive score to incorporate peripheral changes into the ETDRS scale. The implications of the global scale on progression rate are yet to be determined. Elsevier 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9562330/ /pubmed/36249302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100029 Text en © 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Domalpally, Amitha Barrett, Nancy Reimers, James Blodi, Barbara Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale |
title | Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale |
title_full | Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale |
title_short | Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale |
title_sort | comparison of ultra-widefield imaging and standard imaging in assessment of early treatment diabetic retinopathy severity scale |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domalpallyamitha comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale AT barrettnancy comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale AT reimersjames comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale AT blodibarbara comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale |