Cargando…

Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale

PURPOSE: To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. PARTICIPANTS: Paired...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domalpally, Amitha, Barrett, Nancy, Reimers, James, Blodi, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100029
_version_ 1784808148205305856
author Domalpally, Amitha
Barrett, Nancy
Reimers, James
Blodi, Barbara
author_facet Domalpally, Amitha
Barrett, Nancy
Reimers, James
Blodi, Barbara
author_sort Domalpally, Amitha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. PARTICIPANTS: Paired images from 192 eyes (189 participants) with diabetic retinopathy were included. METHODS: The ETDRS levels were determined by masked graders in 3 ways: standard 7-field imaging, UWF within the 7-field region (7-field UWF imaging), and the entire UWF image (global ETDRS imaging). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage agreement between 7-field and UWF imaging for ETDRS levels. RESULTS: Of the 166 paired images evaluated, exact agreement was found in 48.8% of eyes between standard 7-field and 7-field UWF ETDRS levels with a weighted κ value of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–0.68). Agreement rates varied with DR severity and were least in early DR (30.8%) and moderate nonproliferative DR (26.5%) groups. In 156 eyes with 7-field UWF ETDRS and global UWF ETDRS levels, exact agreement was found in 143 eyes (92%), with a weighted κ value of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9–0.98). The peripheral lesions contributed to a higher DR severity in 8% and changed the eye to a proliferative DR level in 2%. Reproducibility of the 3 ETDRS evaluations was comparable with a weighted κ value of 0.57 with standard 7-field imaging, 0.65 with 7-field UWF imaging, and 0.60 with global ETDRS scale imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found in the ETDRS DR severity scale between standard 7-field and UWF imaging, indicating caution in interchanging data from the 2 methods. Both methods showed good reproducibility for clinical trial outcome of 2-step change. The global ETDRS scale provides a comprehensive score to incorporate peripheral changes into the ETDRS scale. The implications of the global scale on progression rate are yet to be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9562330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95623302022-10-14 Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale Domalpally, Amitha Barrett, Nancy Reimers, James Blodi, Barbara Ophthalmol Sci Original Article PURPOSE: To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. PARTICIPANTS: Paired images from 192 eyes (189 participants) with diabetic retinopathy were included. METHODS: The ETDRS levels were determined by masked graders in 3 ways: standard 7-field imaging, UWF within the 7-field region (7-field UWF imaging), and the entire UWF image (global ETDRS imaging). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage agreement between 7-field and UWF imaging for ETDRS levels. RESULTS: Of the 166 paired images evaluated, exact agreement was found in 48.8% of eyes between standard 7-field and 7-field UWF ETDRS levels with a weighted κ value of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–0.68). Agreement rates varied with DR severity and were least in early DR (30.8%) and moderate nonproliferative DR (26.5%) groups. In 156 eyes with 7-field UWF ETDRS and global UWF ETDRS levels, exact agreement was found in 143 eyes (92%), with a weighted κ value of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9–0.98). The peripheral lesions contributed to a higher DR severity in 8% and changed the eye to a proliferative DR level in 2%. Reproducibility of the 3 ETDRS evaluations was comparable with a weighted κ value of 0.57 with standard 7-field imaging, 0.65 with 7-field UWF imaging, and 0.60 with global ETDRS scale imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found in the ETDRS DR severity scale between standard 7-field and UWF imaging, indicating caution in interchanging data from the 2 methods. Both methods showed good reproducibility for clinical trial outcome of 2-step change. The global ETDRS scale provides a comprehensive score to incorporate peripheral changes into the ETDRS scale. The implications of the global scale on progression rate are yet to be determined. Elsevier 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9562330/ /pubmed/36249302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100029 Text en © 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Domalpally, Amitha
Barrett, Nancy
Reimers, James
Blodi, Barbara
Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale
title Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale
title_full Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale
title_fullStr Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale
title_short Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale
title_sort comparison of ultra-widefield imaging and standard imaging in assessment of early treatment diabetic retinopathy severity scale
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100029
work_keys_str_mv AT domalpallyamitha comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale
AT barrettnancy comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale
AT reimersjames comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale
AT blodibarbara comparisonofultrawidefieldimagingandstandardimaginginassessmentofearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathyseverityscale