Cargando…

Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare a novel, 24°, 52-locus online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) application against standard automated perimetry (SAP) in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and patient attitudes. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Ninety-five partici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyerov, Joshua, Deng, Yuanchen, Busija, Lazar, Skalicky, Simon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100172
_version_ 1784808149212987392
author Meyerov, Joshua
Deng, Yuanchen
Busija, Lazar
Skalicky, Simon E.
author_facet Meyerov, Joshua
Deng, Yuanchen
Busija, Lazar
Skalicky, Simon E.
author_sort Meyerov, Joshua
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare a novel, 24°, 52-locus online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) application against standard automated perimetry (SAP) in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and patient attitudes. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Ninety-five participants (42 controls and 53 open-angle glaucoma patients) were included. METHODS: Participants performed both perimetry tests and then completed an online survey. Subjective feedback responses were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating curves (AUCs) were compared for the parameters of OCCP, SAP, and OCT for the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex inner plexiform layer (GCC + IPL). Participant attitudes toward the OCCP test versus the SAP test, in both glaucoma patients and controls, were compared. Rasch analysis assessed the psychometric properties of the survey and intergroup variability. RESULTS: The AUC for OCCP mean deviation (MD) was 0.959 ± 0.02. Compared with other instruments’ parameters with the highest AUC, it was superior to SAP MD (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and OCT GCC + IPL (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and similar to OCT RNFL inferior thickness (IT) (0.917 ± 0.03, no significance). Online circular contrast perimetry pointwise sensitivity was less than SAP by 4.30 dB (95% confidence interval = 4.02–4.59); 95% limits of agreement ranged from −6.28 to −2.33 dB. At the best cutoff, the OCCP MD had a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 85% for detecting glaucoma. Cohen's kappa demonstrated good agreement with SAP MD (0.69) and OCT RNFL IT (0.62) and moderate agreement with OCT GCC + IPL IT (0.57). Participants preferred OCCP across most survey parameters (P < 0.0001). Rasch analysis demonstrated no differential item functioning for clinical group, gender, or age. CONCLUSIONS: With similar diagnostic metrics to SAP, OCCP offers an improved user experience with the potential to increase the provision of care and improve disease surveillance outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9562334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95623342022-10-14 Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry Meyerov, Joshua Deng, Yuanchen Busija, Lazar Skalicky, Simon E. Ophthalmol Sci Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare a novel, 24°, 52-locus online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) application against standard automated perimetry (SAP) in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and patient attitudes. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Ninety-five participants (42 controls and 53 open-angle glaucoma patients) were included. METHODS: Participants performed both perimetry tests and then completed an online survey. Subjective feedback responses were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating curves (AUCs) were compared for the parameters of OCCP, SAP, and OCT for the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex inner plexiform layer (GCC + IPL). Participant attitudes toward the OCCP test versus the SAP test, in both glaucoma patients and controls, were compared. Rasch analysis assessed the psychometric properties of the survey and intergroup variability. RESULTS: The AUC for OCCP mean deviation (MD) was 0.959 ± 0.02. Compared with other instruments’ parameters with the highest AUC, it was superior to SAP MD (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and OCT GCC + IPL (0.871 ± 0.04, P = 0.03) and similar to OCT RNFL inferior thickness (IT) (0.917 ± 0.03, no significance). Online circular contrast perimetry pointwise sensitivity was less than SAP by 4.30 dB (95% confidence interval = 4.02–4.59); 95% limits of agreement ranged from −6.28 to −2.33 dB. At the best cutoff, the OCCP MD had a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 85% for detecting glaucoma. Cohen's kappa demonstrated good agreement with SAP MD (0.69) and OCT RNFL IT (0.62) and moderate agreement with OCT GCC + IPL IT (0.57). Participants preferred OCCP across most survey parameters (P < 0.0001). Rasch analysis demonstrated no differential item functioning for clinical group, gender, or age. CONCLUSIONS: With similar diagnostic metrics to SAP, OCCP offers an improved user experience with the potential to increase the provision of care and improve disease surveillance outcomes. Elsevier 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9562334/ /pubmed/36245753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100172 Text en © 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Meyerov, Joshua
Deng, Yuanchen
Busija, Lazar
Skalicky, Simon E.
Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry
title Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_full Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_fullStr Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_full_unstemmed Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_short Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_sort circular contrast perimetry via web application: a patient appraisal and comparison to standard automated perimetry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100172
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerovjoshua circularcontrastperimetryviawebapplicationapatientappraisalandcomparisontostandardautomatedperimetry
AT dengyuanchen circularcontrastperimetryviawebapplicationapatientappraisalandcomparisontostandardautomatedperimetry
AT busijalazar circularcontrastperimetryviawebapplicationapatientappraisalandcomparisontostandardautomatedperimetry
AT skalickysimone circularcontrastperimetryviawebapplicationapatientappraisalandcomparisontostandardautomatedperimetry