Cargando…
Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients
BACKGROUND: Rapid pathogen identification is critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive, broad-spectrum molecular detection technique that is simple and rapid to perform. It is capable of simultaneously screening f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245589 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-544 |
_version_ | 1784808197010227200 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Cuiping Chen, Xiaoyan Wang, Lu Song, Juan Zhou, Chunmei Wang, Xiaohuan Ma, Yan Chen, Cuicui Guo, Wei Song, Yuanlin |
author_facet | Zhang, Cuiping Chen, Xiaoyan Wang, Lu Song, Juan Zhou, Chunmei Wang, Xiaohuan Ma, Yan Chen, Cuicui Guo, Wei Song, Yuanlin |
author_sort | Zhang, Cuiping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rapid pathogen identification is critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive, broad-spectrum molecular detection technique that is simple and rapid to perform. It is capable of simultaneously screening for multiple pathogens within a short time range. Here, we designed and evaluated a multiplex PCR kit for the identification of 17 common respiratory pathogens in clinical samples from hospitalized patients. METHODS: A total of 452 samples from hospitalized patients, including 242 respiratory and 210 non-respiratory samples, were analyzed for 13 bacteria and 4 fungi by a multiplex fluorescent PCR kit. The diagnostic performance of the kit was assessed by considering routine microbiology as the reference standard. RESULTS: The overall positivity rate of the multiplex PCR kit was 86.9%, much higher than that noted on routine microbiology (56.9%). Furthermore, the co-infection detection rate was also significantly higher than that noted on routine microbiology (69.5% vs. 15.0%). Compared with routine microbiology, kit sensitivity was >90% for detection of most target bacteria, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%, especially for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. The kit was noted to be particularly superior in identifying Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Streptococcus pneumoniae as compared to routine microbiology. The multiplex PCR kit was noted to be less sensitive (33.3–59.6%) and more specific (93.9–100.0%) for detection of mycobacteria and fungi. CONCLUSIONS: Our multiplex PCR kit offers a rapid and sensitive diagnosis of common bacterial pneumonia, although sensitivity for mycobacteria and fungi warrants enhancement. Further optimization includes minimizing false positivity and increasing relevance to clinical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9562540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95625402022-10-15 Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients Zhang, Cuiping Chen, Xiaoyan Wang, Lu Song, Juan Zhou, Chunmei Wang, Xiaohuan Ma, Yan Chen, Cuicui Guo, Wei Song, Yuanlin J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Rapid pathogen identification is critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive, broad-spectrum molecular detection technique that is simple and rapid to perform. It is capable of simultaneously screening for multiple pathogens within a short time range. Here, we designed and evaluated a multiplex PCR kit for the identification of 17 common respiratory pathogens in clinical samples from hospitalized patients. METHODS: A total of 452 samples from hospitalized patients, including 242 respiratory and 210 non-respiratory samples, were analyzed for 13 bacteria and 4 fungi by a multiplex fluorescent PCR kit. The diagnostic performance of the kit was assessed by considering routine microbiology as the reference standard. RESULTS: The overall positivity rate of the multiplex PCR kit was 86.9%, much higher than that noted on routine microbiology (56.9%). Furthermore, the co-infection detection rate was also significantly higher than that noted on routine microbiology (69.5% vs. 15.0%). Compared with routine microbiology, kit sensitivity was >90% for detection of most target bacteria, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%, especially for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. The kit was noted to be particularly superior in identifying Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Streptococcus pneumoniae as compared to routine microbiology. The multiplex PCR kit was noted to be less sensitive (33.3–59.6%) and more specific (93.9–100.0%) for detection of mycobacteria and fungi. CONCLUSIONS: Our multiplex PCR kit offers a rapid and sensitive diagnosis of common bacterial pneumonia, although sensitivity for mycobacteria and fungi warrants enhancement. Further optimization includes minimizing false positivity and increasing relevance to clinical application. AME Publishing Company 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9562540/ /pubmed/36245589 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-544 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Cuiping Chen, Xiaoyan Wang, Lu Song, Juan Zhou, Chunmei Wang, Xiaohuan Ma, Yan Chen, Cuicui Guo, Wei Song, Yuanlin Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients |
title | Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients |
title_full | Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients |
title_short | Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients |
title_sort | evaluation of a multiplex pcr kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245589 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangcuiping evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT chenxiaoyan evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT wanglu evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT songjuan evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT zhouchunmei evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT wangxiaohuan evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT mayan evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT chencuicui evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT guowei evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients AT songyuanlin evaluationofamultiplexpcrkitfordetectionof17respiratorypathogensinhospitalizedpatients |