Cargando…

Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications

BACKGROUND: Accurate perioperative risk assessment can enhance the perioperative management of patients undergoing radical surgery for lung cancer. In this study, we compared the accuracy of predicting perioperative complications by lung function values, estimated by blood flow ratios (BFRs), to det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanaoka, Jun, Shiratori, Takuya, Okamoto, Keigo, Kaku, Ryosuke, Kawaguchi, Yo, Ohshio, Yasuhiko, Sonoda, Akinaga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245586
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-383
_version_ 1784808199290880000
author Hanaoka, Jun
Shiratori, Takuya
Okamoto, Keigo
Kaku, Ryosuke
Kawaguchi, Yo
Ohshio, Yasuhiko
Sonoda, Akinaga
author_facet Hanaoka, Jun
Shiratori, Takuya
Okamoto, Keigo
Kaku, Ryosuke
Kawaguchi, Yo
Ohshio, Yasuhiko
Sonoda, Akinaga
author_sort Hanaoka, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate perioperative risk assessment can enhance the perioperative management of patients undergoing radical surgery for lung cancer. In this study, we compared the accuracy of predicting perioperative complications by lung function values, estimated by blood flow ratios (BFRs), to determine whether dynamic perfusion digital radiography (DPDR) could substitute for pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy (PPS). METHODS: Patients scheduled for radical surgery for lung cancer who underwent simultaneous dynamic chest radiography (DCR) and lung perfusion scintigraphy were assessed. We confirmed the agreement between two methods in the assessment of the BFR and its predicted postoperative (ppo) value. Besides, the best spirometry thresholds for the risk of perioperative respiratory or cardiovascular complications were calculated from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The imaging methods were compared for sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Among the 44 cases enrolled, DPDR and PPS showed high correlations in BFR (r=0.868, P<0.01) and its postoperative value (r=0.975, P<0.01) and between the predicted and measured spirometry values. In both imaging modalities, the estimated postoperative diffusing capacity test for carbon monoxide (DLco) had the best prediction [area under the curve (AUC) >0.7] for respiratory complications within 1 month (with different cut-offs for same target cases). For predicting, respiratory complications within 1–3 months after surgery, these values were similar between two modalities. Furthermore, the ppoDLco values from both imaging methods were excellent indicators of the induction of postoperative long term oxygen therapy, with the AUC greater than 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that simple and less invasive DPDR can be a good alternative to PPS for predicting postoperative pulmonary function values and the risk of postoperative respiratory complications. This new imaging modality will offer new insights and possible functional analyses of pulmonary circulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9562549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95625492022-10-15 Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications Hanaoka, Jun Shiratori, Takuya Okamoto, Keigo Kaku, Ryosuke Kawaguchi, Yo Ohshio, Yasuhiko Sonoda, Akinaga J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Accurate perioperative risk assessment can enhance the perioperative management of patients undergoing radical surgery for lung cancer. In this study, we compared the accuracy of predicting perioperative complications by lung function values, estimated by blood flow ratios (BFRs), to determine whether dynamic perfusion digital radiography (DPDR) could substitute for pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy (PPS). METHODS: Patients scheduled for radical surgery for lung cancer who underwent simultaneous dynamic chest radiography (DCR) and lung perfusion scintigraphy were assessed. We confirmed the agreement between two methods in the assessment of the BFR and its predicted postoperative (ppo) value. Besides, the best spirometry thresholds for the risk of perioperative respiratory or cardiovascular complications were calculated from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The imaging methods were compared for sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Among the 44 cases enrolled, DPDR and PPS showed high correlations in BFR (r=0.868, P<0.01) and its postoperative value (r=0.975, P<0.01) and between the predicted and measured spirometry values. In both imaging modalities, the estimated postoperative diffusing capacity test for carbon monoxide (DLco) had the best prediction [area under the curve (AUC) >0.7] for respiratory complications within 1 month (with different cut-offs for same target cases). For predicting, respiratory complications within 1–3 months after surgery, these values were similar between two modalities. Furthermore, the ppoDLco values from both imaging methods were excellent indicators of the induction of postoperative long term oxygen therapy, with the AUC greater than 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that simple and less invasive DPDR can be a good alternative to PPS for predicting postoperative pulmonary function values and the risk of postoperative respiratory complications. This new imaging modality will offer new insights and possible functional analyses of pulmonary circulation. AME Publishing Company 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9562549/ /pubmed/36245586 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-383 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hanaoka, Jun
Shiratori, Takuya
Okamoto, Keigo
Kaku, Ryosuke
Kawaguchi, Yo
Ohshio, Yasuhiko
Sonoda, Akinaga
Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications
title Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications
title_full Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications
title_fullStr Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications
title_short Reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications
title_sort reliability of dynamic perfusion digital radiography as an alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting postoperative lung function and complications
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245586
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-383
work_keys_str_mv AT hanaokajun reliabilityofdynamicperfusiondigitalradiographyasanalternativetopulmonaryperfusionscintigraphyinpredictingpostoperativelungfunctionandcomplications
AT shiratoritakuya reliabilityofdynamicperfusiondigitalradiographyasanalternativetopulmonaryperfusionscintigraphyinpredictingpostoperativelungfunctionandcomplications
AT okamotokeigo reliabilityofdynamicperfusiondigitalradiographyasanalternativetopulmonaryperfusionscintigraphyinpredictingpostoperativelungfunctionandcomplications
AT kakuryosuke reliabilityofdynamicperfusiondigitalradiographyasanalternativetopulmonaryperfusionscintigraphyinpredictingpostoperativelungfunctionandcomplications
AT kawaguchiyo reliabilityofdynamicperfusiondigitalradiographyasanalternativetopulmonaryperfusionscintigraphyinpredictingpostoperativelungfunctionandcomplications
AT ohshioyasuhiko reliabilityofdynamicperfusiondigitalradiographyasanalternativetopulmonaryperfusionscintigraphyinpredictingpostoperativelungfunctionandcomplications
AT sonodaakinaga reliabilityofdynamicperfusiondigitalradiographyasanalternativetopulmonaryperfusionscintigraphyinpredictingpostoperativelungfunctionandcomplications