Cargando…

Giving a leg up part 2: the ethical challenges of Body Integrity Dysphoria

INTRODUCTION: Body Integrity Dysphoria (BID) is a diagnosis, newly described in ICD-11, “characterised by an intense and persistent desire to become physically disabled in a significant way… accompanied by persistent discomfort, or intense feelings of inappropriateness concerning current non-disable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumais-Lévesque, G., Pham Thi-Desmarteau, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563152/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.287
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Body Integrity Dysphoria (BID) is a diagnosis, newly described in ICD-11, “characterised by an intense and persistent desire to become physically disabled in a significant way… accompanied by persistent discomfort, or intense feelings of inappropriateness concerning current non-disabled body configuration”. Patients with BID may request the amputation of healthy limbs but this raises multiple ethical challenges. OBJECTIVES: By the end of the presentation, participants 1) will better understand the new diagnosis of Body Integrity Dysphoria; 2) will be able to have some landmarks to evaluate and manage this rare condition 3) will discern the ethical challenges raised by an elective or emergent amputation request. METHODS: We present a complex case we faced in Quebec City, Canada. A young adult admitted to the intensive care and burn unit was referred to our Consultation Liaison (CL) team. For the second time in a year, the individual deliberately burned his leg, with the intention of having an amputation. Based on the available literature and our experience, we explore the ethical aspects of this case. RESULTS: For this situation, the multidisciplinary team faced uncertainty and ambivalence toward the best treatment options. Deontological concerns and ethical issues emerged from the patient’s request for amputation. CONCLUSIONS: We outline how ethical concepts helped us to gain a shared comprehension of the patient’s extraordinary request, both during treatment and afterwards. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.