Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aimed to evaluate and compare the interactive effects of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Randomized controlled trials comparing different antiplatelet or anticoagulant strategies in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yaowang, Cai, Zhigang, Dong, Shaohong, Liu, Huadong, Pang, Xinli, Chen, Qiuling, Yuan, Jie, Geng, Qingshan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.992376
_version_ 1784808351537823744
author Lin, Yaowang
Cai, Zhigang
Dong, Shaohong
Liu, Huadong
Pang, Xinli
Chen, Qiuling
Yuan, Jie
Geng, Qingshan
author_facet Lin, Yaowang
Cai, Zhigang
Dong, Shaohong
Liu, Huadong
Pang, Xinli
Chen, Qiuling
Yuan, Jie
Geng, Qingshan
author_sort Lin, Yaowang
collection PubMed
description Aimed to evaluate and compare the interactive effects of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Randomized controlled trials comparing different antiplatelet or anticoagulant strategies in patients with CCS after PCI were included. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), mortality, ischemic and bleeding events. Compared to aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel or ticagrelor to aspirin resulted in lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI) [odds ratio (OR): 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.38–0.62); 0.810–0.84 (0.69–0.98)] and any stroke [0.56 (0.42–0.75)] at the expense of increased risk of major bleeding [1.79 (1.34–2.39); 2.08–2.38 (1.56–3.28)], whereas, clopidogrel monotherapy reduced the risk of any stroke, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. On subgroup analysis, compared with aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel resulted in lower MACE [0.72 (0.60–0.86)], MI [0.48 (0.38–0.62)], and stent thrombosis [0.29 (0.09–0.91)], whereas, addition of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg resulted in lower risk of MACE [0.72 (0.60–0.87)], cardiac death [0.71 (0.52–0.98)] and any stroke [0.65 (0.45–0.95)], but not reduced MI. Both prasugrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg increased major bleeding [1.79 (1.34–2.39); 1.72 (1.33–2.22)]. Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with lower MACE [0.72 (0.58–0.90)], any stroke [0.42 (0.24–0.73)], and major bleeding [0.62 (0.40–0.96)]. Adding prasugrel or ticagrelor led to a reduced incidence of MI and prasugrel was also found to reduce the risk of MACE and stent thrombosis in CCS patients with low risk of bleeding after PCI. Clopidogrel monotherapy has advantage in reducing MACE, stroke, and major bleeding events in CCS patients at high risk of bleeding after PCI. Systematic Review Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, PROSPERO Identifier: CRD 42021291050.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9563230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95632302022-10-15 Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Lin, Yaowang Cai, Zhigang Dong, Shaohong Liu, Huadong Pang, Xinli Chen, Qiuling Yuan, Jie Geng, Qingshan Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Aimed to evaluate and compare the interactive effects of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Randomized controlled trials comparing different antiplatelet or anticoagulant strategies in patients with CCS after PCI were included. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), mortality, ischemic and bleeding events. Compared to aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel or ticagrelor to aspirin resulted in lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI) [odds ratio (OR): 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.38–0.62); 0.810–0.84 (0.69–0.98)] and any stroke [0.56 (0.42–0.75)] at the expense of increased risk of major bleeding [1.79 (1.34–2.39); 2.08–2.38 (1.56–3.28)], whereas, clopidogrel monotherapy reduced the risk of any stroke, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. On subgroup analysis, compared with aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel resulted in lower MACE [0.72 (0.60–0.86)], MI [0.48 (0.38–0.62)], and stent thrombosis [0.29 (0.09–0.91)], whereas, addition of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg resulted in lower risk of MACE [0.72 (0.60–0.87)], cardiac death [0.71 (0.52–0.98)] and any stroke [0.65 (0.45–0.95)], but not reduced MI. Both prasugrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg increased major bleeding [1.79 (1.34–2.39); 1.72 (1.33–2.22)]. Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with lower MACE [0.72 (0.58–0.90)], any stroke [0.42 (0.24–0.73)], and major bleeding [0.62 (0.40–0.96)]. Adding prasugrel or ticagrelor led to a reduced incidence of MI and prasugrel was also found to reduce the risk of MACE and stent thrombosis in CCS patients with low risk of bleeding after PCI. Clopidogrel monotherapy has advantage in reducing MACE, stroke, and major bleeding events in CCS patients at high risk of bleeding after PCI. Systematic Review Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, PROSPERO Identifier: CRD 42021291050. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9563230/ /pubmed/36249742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.992376 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lin, Cai, Dong, Liu, Pang, Chen, Yuan and Geng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Lin, Yaowang
Cai, Zhigang
Dong, Shaohong
Liu, Huadong
Pang, Xinli
Chen, Qiuling
Yuan, Jie
Geng, Qingshan
Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.992376
work_keys_str_mv AT linyaowang comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT caizhigang comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dongshaohong comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuhuadong comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT pangxinli comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenqiuling comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuanjie comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gengqingshan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofantiplateletoranticoagulanttherapyinpatientswithchroniccoronarysyndromesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials