Cargando…
The influence of inter-bubble spacing on the resonance response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles
Ultrasound-driven microbubbles, typically between 1 and 8 µm in diameter, are resonant scatterers that are employed as diagnostic contrast agents and emerging as potentiators of targeted therapies. Microbubbles are administered in populations whereby their radial dynamics – key to their effectivenes...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106191 |
Sumario: | Ultrasound-driven microbubbles, typically between 1 and 8 µm in diameter, are resonant scatterers that are employed as diagnostic contrast agents and emerging as potentiators of targeted therapies. Microbubbles are administered in populations whereby their radial dynamics – key to their effectiveness - are greatly affected by intrinsic (e.g. bubble size) and extrinsic (e.g. boundaries) factors. In this work, we aim to understand how two neighbouring microbubbles influence each other. We developed a finite element model of a system of two individual phospholipid-encapsulated microbubbles vibrating in proximity to each other to study the effect of inter-bubble distance on microbubble radial resonance response. For the case of two equal-sized and identical bubbles, each bubble exhibits a decrease between 7 and 10% in the frequency of maximum response ([Formula: see text]) and an increase in amplitude of maximum response ([Formula: see text]) by 9–11% as compared to its isolated response in free-space, depending on the bubble size examined. For a system of two unequal-sized microbubbles, the large bubble shows no significant change, however the smaller microbubble shows an increase in [Formula: see text] by 7–11% and a significant decrease in [Formula: see text] by 38–52%. Furthermore, in very close proximity the small bubble shows a secondary off-resonance peak at the corresponding [Formula: see text] of its larger companion microbubble. Our work suggests that frequency-dependent microbubble response is greatly affected by the presence of another bubble, which has implications in both imaging and therapy applications. Furthermore, our work suggests a mechanism by which nanobubbles show significant off-resonance vibrations in the clinical frequency range, a behaviour that has been observed experimentally but heretofore unexplained. |
---|