Reoperation rates of stress incontinence surgery in rural vs urban hospitals

BACKGROUND: XXX. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the impact of a rural vs urban hospital location on the risk of undergoing a second surgery for stress urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: Using the Cerner Health Facts nationwide electronic medical record database, we identified patients who underwent surgeries for stress incontinence between January 1, 2010 and November 30, 2018. Stress incontinence surgeries included synthetic midurethral slings, fascial slings, retropubic urethral suspension, and other surgeries for stress urinary incontinence, such as the laparoscopic sling or the Pereyra procedure. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, namely those who had a single operation and those who had a reoperation, defined as any second stress incontinence surgery or revision after initial incontinence surgery. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether urban vs rural hospital location impacted reoperation rates. We adjusted for significant sociodemographic variables identified in the univariate analysis with a P value <.1. RESULTS: Of the 25,085 women who underwent stress incontinence procedures, 669 (2.7%) underwent a second surgery. Of these, 346 (51.7%) patients underwent were a second stress incontinence procedure, 307 (45.9%) underwent revisions of the index case, and 16 (2.4%) underwent both. Women in the single surgery cohort were older (median age, 54 vs 53 years; P=.029). In the total sample, 85.5% identified as White and 4.5% identified as Black. Of the study cohort, 7720 (30.8%) had obesity and 2660 (10.6%) had diabetes. There was a higher rate of reoperation among patients with obesity (3.0% vs 2.5%; P=.017). Among patients who underwent a concomitant prolapse surgery with their index surgery, there were fewer reoperations (2.2% vs 2.8%; P=.012). In the univariate analysis, we did not detect a difference between women who lived in rural vs urban areas (3.0% vs 2.6%; P=.16). After adjusting for confounders, we still did not see a significant association between rural hospital location and the risk for repeat surgery (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.31). In this multivariable regression, obesity increased the risk for having a reoperation (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.41), whereas patients who had concomitant prolapse procedures with their index surgery had a reduced risk for having a reoperation (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.98). CONCLUSION: We did not detect an association between hospital location (rural vs urban) and the risk for reoperation among women undergoing stress incontinence surgery. With low reoperation rates, patients can be reassured that they are receiving excellent care in either setting.