Cargando…

Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing focus on the technical performance of total mesorectal excision over recent decades, anastomotic leakage (AL) continues to be a serious complication for many patients, even in the hands of experienced surgical teams. This study describes implementation of standardized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksen, Jacob Damgaard, Thaysen, Henriette Vind, Emmertsen, Katrine Jøssing, Madsen, Anders Husted, Tøttrup, Anders, Nørager, Charlotte Buchard, Ljungmann, Ken, Thomassen, Niels, Delaney, Conor Patrick, Iversen, Lene Hjerrild
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01809-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite increasing focus on the technical performance of total mesorectal excision over recent decades, anastomotic leakage (AL) continues to be a serious complication for many patients, even in the hands of experienced surgical teams. This study describes implementation of standardized surgical technique in an effort to reduce variability, decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage, and improve associated short-term outcomes for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted restorative rectal resection (RRR). METHODS: We evaluated all rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR at Aarhus University Hospital between 2017 and 2020. Six standardized surgical steps directed to improve anastomotic healing were mandatory for all RRR. Additional changes were made during the period with prohibition of systemic dexamethasone and limiting the use of endoscopic stapling devices. RESULTS: The use of the full standardization, including all six surgical steps, increased from 40.3% (95% CI, 0.28–0.54) to 86.2% (95% CI, 0.68–0.95). The incidence of AL decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12–0.33) to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01–0.23). Length of hospital stay (LOS) decreased from 6 days (range 2–50) to 5 days (range 2–26). The rate of patients readmitted within 90 days decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12–0.33), to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01–0.23). CONCLUSION: The full standardization was effectively implemented for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR. The risk of AL, LOS and readmission decreased during the study period. A team focus on high-reliability and peri-operative complications can improve patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01809-3.