Cargando…

An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is an established biomarker for bacterial sepsis in the nonpregnant population with better diagnostic and prognostic value for bacterial infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether procalcitonin levels could be used in the diagnosis and management of intrapa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Sarah, Harding, Irasha, Soomro, Kamran, Bamber, Andrew R., Carrick, Sophie, Waheed, Abdul H., Liebling, Rachel E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100064
_version_ 1784808486012452864
author Walker, Sarah
Harding, Irasha
Soomro, Kamran
Bamber, Andrew R.
Carrick, Sophie
Waheed, Abdul H.
Liebling, Rachel E.
author_facet Walker, Sarah
Harding, Irasha
Soomro, Kamran
Bamber, Andrew R.
Carrick, Sophie
Waheed, Abdul H.
Liebling, Rachel E.
author_sort Walker, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is an established biomarker for bacterial sepsis in the nonpregnant population with better diagnostic and prognostic value for bacterial infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether procalcitonin levels could be used in the diagnosis and management of intrapartum sepsis in women and their neonates suspected of intrapartum bacterial sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the University Hospitals of Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust. Overall, 117 women and their neonates managed for suspected intrapartum sepsis from June 2020 to October 2020 were included. Procalcitonin levels were measured in addition to routine biomarkers white cell count and C-reactive protein in women and their neonates during the initial septic screen and follow-up blood samples. The placentas underwent detailed histopathology. Maternal and neonatal parameters were used to categorize cases into “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis,” “equivocal bacterial sepsis,” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis.” The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare categories with biomarker values and placental histology scores. RESULTS: Procalcitonin level was increased in 6 women in the initial septic screen sample, compared with 100 women with an increased C-reactive protein level. There was a significant difference in maternal postnatal procalcitonin results between “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis” categories (P=.004). Moreover, 71.2% of placentas showed varying degrees of chorioamnionitis. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of women, 94.6% had normal procalcitonin levels while in labor at the time of the septic screen, consistent with the low number of confirmed bacteremia. The result provided a basis that procalcitonin may complement clinical judgment and interpretation of already used prognostic and diagnostic tests, improving patient care in the management of intrapartum sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9563784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95637842022-10-21 An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis Walker, Sarah Harding, Irasha Soomro, Kamran Bamber, Andrew R. Carrick, Sophie Waheed, Abdul H. Liebling, Rachel E. AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is an established biomarker for bacterial sepsis in the nonpregnant population with better diagnostic and prognostic value for bacterial infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether procalcitonin levels could be used in the diagnosis and management of intrapartum sepsis in women and their neonates suspected of intrapartum bacterial sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the University Hospitals of Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust. Overall, 117 women and their neonates managed for suspected intrapartum sepsis from June 2020 to October 2020 were included. Procalcitonin levels were measured in addition to routine biomarkers white cell count and C-reactive protein in women and their neonates during the initial septic screen and follow-up blood samples. The placentas underwent detailed histopathology. Maternal and neonatal parameters were used to categorize cases into “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis,” “equivocal bacterial sepsis,” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis.” The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare categories with biomarker values and placental histology scores. RESULTS: Procalcitonin level was increased in 6 women in the initial septic screen sample, compared with 100 women with an increased C-reactive protein level. There was a significant difference in maternal postnatal procalcitonin results between “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis” categories (P=.004). Moreover, 71.2% of placentas showed varying degrees of chorioamnionitis. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of women, 94.6% had normal procalcitonin levels while in labor at the time of the septic screen, consistent with the low number of confirmed bacteremia. The result provided a basis that procalcitonin may complement clinical judgment and interpretation of already used prognostic and diagnostic tests, improving patient care in the management of intrapartum sepsis. Elsevier 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9563784/ /pubmed/36276783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100064 Text en Crown Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Walker, Sarah
Harding, Irasha
Soomro, Kamran
Bamber, Andrew R.
Carrick, Sophie
Waheed, Abdul H.
Liebling, Rachel E.
An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
title An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
title_full An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
title_fullStr An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
title_short An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
title_sort evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100064
work_keys_str_mv AT walkersarah anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT hardingirasha anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT soomrokamran anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT bamberandrewr anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT carricksophie anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT waheedabdulh anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT lieblingrachele anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT walkersarah evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT hardingirasha evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT soomrokamran evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT bamberandrewr evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT carricksophie evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT waheedabdulh evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis
AT lieblingrachele evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis