Cargando…
An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis
BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is an established biomarker for bacterial sepsis in the nonpregnant population with better diagnostic and prognostic value for bacterial infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether procalcitonin levels could be used in the diagnosis and management of intrapa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100064 |
_version_ | 1784808486012452864 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Sarah Harding, Irasha Soomro, Kamran Bamber, Andrew R. Carrick, Sophie Waheed, Abdul H. Liebling, Rachel E. |
author_facet | Walker, Sarah Harding, Irasha Soomro, Kamran Bamber, Andrew R. Carrick, Sophie Waheed, Abdul H. Liebling, Rachel E. |
author_sort | Walker, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is an established biomarker for bacterial sepsis in the nonpregnant population with better diagnostic and prognostic value for bacterial infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether procalcitonin levels could be used in the diagnosis and management of intrapartum sepsis in women and their neonates suspected of intrapartum bacterial sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the University Hospitals of Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust. Overall, 117 women and their neonates managed for suspected intrapartum sepsis from June 2020 to October 2020 were included. Procalcitonin levels were measured in addition to routine biomarkers white cell count and C-reactive protein in women and their neonates during the initial septic screen and follow-up blood samples. The placentas underwent detailed histopathology. Maternal and neonatal parameters were used to categorize cases into “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis,” “equivocal bacterial sepsis,” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis.” The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare categories with biomarker values and placental histology scores. RESULTS: Procalcitonin level was increased in 6 women in the initial septic screen sample, compared with 100 women with an increased C-reactive protein level. There was a significant difference in maternal postnatal procalcitonin results between “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis” categories (P=.004). Moreover, 71.2% of placentas showed varying degrees of chorioamnionitis. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of women, 94.6% had normal procalcitonin levels while in labor at the time of the septic screen, consistent with the low number of confirmed bacteremia. The result provided a basis that procalcitonin may complement clinical judgment and interpretation of already used prognostic and diagnostic tests, improving patient care in the management of intrapartum sepsis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9563784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95637842022-10-21 An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis Walker, Sarah Harding, Irasha Soomro, Kamran Bamber, Andrew R. Carrick, Sophie Waheed, Abdul H. Liebling, Rachel E. AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is an established biomarker for bacterial sepsis in the nonpregnant population with better diagnostic and prognostic value for bacterial infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether procalcitonin levels could be used in the diagnosis and management of intrapartum sepsis in women and their neonates suspected of intrapartum bacterial sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the University Hospitals of Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust. Overall, 117 women and their neonates managed for suspected intrapartum sepsis from June 2020 to October 2020 were included. Procalcitonin levels were measured in addition to routine biomarkers white cell count and C-reactive protein in women and their neonates during the initial septic screen and follow-up blood samples. The placentas underwent detailed histopathology. Maternal and neonatal parameters were used to categorize cases into “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis,” “equivocal bacterial sepsis,” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis.” The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare categories with biomarker values and placental histology scores. RESULTS: Procalcitonin level was increased in 6 women in the initial septic screen sample, compared with 100 women with an increased C-reactive protein level. There was a significant difference in maternal postnatal procalcitonin results between “high-suspicion bacterial sepsis” and “low-suspicion bacterial sepsis” categories (P=.004). Moreover, 71.2% of placentas showed varying degrees of chorioamnionitis. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of women, 94.6% had normal procalcitonin levels while in labor at the time of the septic screen, consistent with the low number of confirmed bacteremia. The result provided a basis that procalcitonin may complement clinical judgment and interpretation of already used prognostic and diagnostic tests, improving patient care in the management of intrapartum sepsis. Elsevier 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9563784/ /pubmed/36276783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100064 Text en Crown Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Walker, Sarah Harding, Irasha Soomro, Kamran Bamber, Andrew R. Carrick, Sophie Waheed, Abdul H. Liebling, Rachel E. An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis |
title | An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis |
title_full | An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis |
title_fullStr | An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis |
title_short | An evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis |
title_sort | evaluation into the use of procalcitonin levels as a biomarker of bacterial sepsis to aid the management of intrapartum pyrexia and chorioamnionitis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkersarah anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT hardingirasha anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT soomrokamran anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT bamberandrewr anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT carricksophie anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT waheedabdulh anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT lieblingrachele anevaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT walkersarah evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT hardingirasha evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT soomrokamran evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT bamberandrewr evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT carricksophie evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT waheedabdulh evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis AT lieblingrachele evaluationintotheuseofprocalcitoninlevelsasabiomarkerofbacterialsepsistoaidthemanagementofintrapartumpyrexiaandchorioamnionitis |