Cargando…

Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: In the current study, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the management of optic pathway glioma (OPG). This review will analyze demographics, information regarding the type of treatment, radiological and clinical (visual) outcomes, and also complications. Of the 105...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousefi, Omid, Azami, Pouria, Sabahi, Mohammadmahdi, Dabecco, Rocco, Adada, Badih, Borghei-Razavi, Hamid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194781
_version_ 1784808520261042176
author Yousefi, Omid
Azami, Pouria
Sabahi, Mohammadmahdi
Dabecco, Rocco
Adada, Badih
Borghei-Razavi, Hamid
author_facet Yousefi, Omid
Azami, Pouria
Sabahi, Mohammadmahdi
Dabecco, Rocco
Adada, Badih
Borghei-Razavi, Hamid
author_sort Yousefi, Omid
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: In the current study, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the management of optic pathway glioma (OPG). This review will analyze demographics, information regarding the type of treatment, radiological and clinical (visual) outcomes, and also complications. Of the 105 eligible studies, a total of 4177 patients underwent different therapeutic modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The mean age was 8.17 years, and the gender ratio was 97 males per 100 females. Based on the available data, the mean follow-up was 98.6 months, and 48.7% of the patients were known cases of neurofibromatosis type1. According to the Dodge classification, 1104, 941, and 1353 tumors were D(1), D(2), and D(3), respectively. The toxicity induced by either chemo- or radiotherapy was the most common complication, followed by ophthalmologic complications rather than visual acuity exacerbation. Small sample sizes in studies that compare different therapeutic modalities for OPG treatment, heterogeneity in multiple parameters including tumor locations, patients’ age distribution who received treatment, patients lost to follow-up in many studies, lack of high-power studies, and insufficient power to adequately prove the efficacy or safety profile of different therapeutic modalities are all possible limitations of this systematic review. Moreover, in order to reduce the versatility between studies, we have considered all different types of surgical procedures, distinct chemotherapy (CT) regimens, and separate ways to deliver irradiation in OPG patients as surgery, CT, and radiotherapy (RT), respectively. This assumption was made since available data were neither representative of actual therapeutic modalities nor provided an opportunity to conduct sub-group analysis. Additionally, since children’s visual assessments are notoriously recalcitrant, it might be obscure the results of visual acuity in pediatrics. ABSTRACT: Background: OPG accounts for 3–5% of childhood central nervous system (CNS) tumors and about 2% of pediatric glial lesions. Methods: Article selection was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Results: The pooled mortality rate was 0.12 (95%CI 0.09–0.14). Due to the unrepresentative data, improved and not changed outcomes were classified as favorable outcomes and worsened as unfavorable. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the rate of clinical and radiological favorable outcomes. In terms of visual assessment, the pooled rate of a favorable outcome in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery was 0.74, 0.81, and 0.65, respectively, and the overall pooled rate of the favorable outcome was 0.75 (95%CI 0.70–0.80). In terms of radiological assessment, the rate of a favorable outcome following chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery was 0.71, 0.74, and 0.67, respectively, and the overall pooled rate of the favorable outcome is 0.71 (95%CI 0.65–0.77). The subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the rate of clinical and radiological favorable outcomes between the different treatment modalities (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our analyses showed that each therapeutic modality represents viable treatment options to achieve remission for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9563939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95639392022-10-15 Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yousefi, Omid Azami, Pouria Sabahi, Mohammadmahdi Dabecco, Rocco Adada, Badih Borghei-Razavi, Hamid Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: In the current study, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the management of optic pathway glioma (OPG). This review will analyze demographics, information regarding the type of treatment, radiological and clinical (visual) outcomes, and also complications. Of the 105 eligible studies, a total of 4177 patients underwent different therapeutic modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The mean age was 8.17 years, and the gender ratio was 97 males per 100 females. Based on the available data, the mean follow-up was 98.6 months, and 48.7% of the patients were known cases of neurofibromatosis type1. According to the Dodge classification, 1104, 941, and 1353 tumors were D(1), D(2), and D(3), respectively. The toxicity induced by either chemo- or radiotherapy was the most common complication, followed by ophthalmologic complications rather than visual acuity exacerbation. Small sample sizes in studies that compare different therapeutic modalities for OPG treatment, heterogeneity in multiple parameters including tumor locations, patients’ age distribution who received treatment, patients lost to follow-up in many studies, lack of high-power studies, and insufficient power to adequately prove the efficacy or safety profile of different therapeutic modalities are all possible limitations of this systematic review. Moreover, in order to reduce the versatility between studies, we have considered all different types of surgical procedures, distinct chemotherapy (CT) regimens, and separate ways to deliver irradiation in OPG patients as surgery, CT, and radiotherapy (RT), respectively. This assumption was made since available data were neither representative of actual therapeutic modalities nor provided an opportunity to conduct sub-group analysis. Additionally, since children’s visual assessments are notoriously recalcitrant, it might be obscure the results of visual acuity in pediatrics. ABSTRACT: Background: OPG accounts for 3–5% of childhood central nervous system (CNS) tumors and about 2% of pediatric glial lesions. Methods: Article selection was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Results: The pooled mortality rate was 0.12 (95%CI 0.09–0.14). Due to the unrepresentative data, improved and not changed outcomes were classified as favorable outcomes and worsened as unfavorable. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the rate of clinical and radiological favorable outcomes. In terms of visual assessment, the pooled rate of a favorable outcome in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery was 0.74, 0.81, and 0.65, respectively, and the overall pooled rate of the favorable outcome was 0.75 (95%CI 0.70–0.80). In terms of radiological assessment, the rate of a favorable outcome following chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery was 0.71, 0.74, and 0.67, respectively, and the overall pooled rate of the favorable outcome is 0.71 (95%CI 0.65–0.77). The subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the rate of clinical and radiological favorable outcomes between the different treatment modalities (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our analyses showed that each therapeutic modality represents viable treatment options to achieve remission for these patients. MDPI 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9563939/ /pubmed/36230704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194781 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Yousefi, Omid
Azami, Pouria
Sabahi, Mohammadmahdi
Dabecco, Rocco
Adada, Badih
Borghei-Razavi, Hamid
Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Management of Optic Pathway Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort management of optic pathway glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194781
work_keys_str_mv AT yousefiomid managementofopticpathwaygliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT azamipouria managementofopticpathwaygliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sabahimohammadmahdi managementofopticpathwaygliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dabeccorocco managementofopticpathwaygliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT adadabadih managementofopticpathwaygliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT borgheirazavihamid managementofopticpathwaygliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis