Cargando…

Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyles, Glenn P., Weaver, Ashlee M., Cohn, David E., Backes, Floor J., Copeland, Larry J., Bixel, Kristin L., Fowler, Jeffrey M., O'Malley, David M., Cosgrove, Casey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100022
_version_ 1784808520502214656
author Boyles, Glenn P.
Weaver, Ashlee M.
Cohn, David E.
Backes, Floor J.
Copeland, Larry J.
Bixel, Kristin L.
Fowler, Jeffrey M.
O'Malley, David M.
Cosgrove, Casey M.
author_facet Boyles, Glenn P.
Weaver, Ashlee M.
Cohn, David E.
Backes, Floor J.
Copeland, Larry J.
Bixel, Kristin L.
Fowler, Jeffrey M.
O'Malley, David M.
Cosgrove, Casey M.
author_sort Boyles, Glenn P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the rate of wound complications following simple vulvar excision and to identify the risk factors for these outcomes. Our secondary objectives were to determine the rates of (1) positive margins and (2) occult carcinoma in the cases of vulvar dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent simple vulvar excision procedures for suspected premalignant or benign lesions between June 2016 and February 2020. Our primary outcome was the rate of composite wound complications, including wound separation or breakdown, infection, or hematoma. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of (1) margins positive for residual dysplasia and (2) occult minimally invasive carcinoma. The Fisher exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the categorical variables and logistic regression models and independent student t tests were used for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate stepwise selection and multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for complications and generate the odds ratios. RESULTS: Of the 338 patients included in the study, 143 (42.3%) experienced wound complication. Most of these complications were wound separation or breakdown (n=134, 39.6%), followed by infection (n=22, 6.5%), and hematoma (n=4, 1.2%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of high-grade vulvar dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–3.15), longer specimen diameter (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.05), and lesion location on the perineum (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.38–3.66) were independent risk factors. With high-grade vulvar dysplasia, the rate of positive margins was 50.2% (114/227) and that of occult microinvasive carcinoma was 17.2% (39/227). Notably, the primary and secondary outcomes were similar among gynecologic oncologists and gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions are common. Select groups may benefit from anticipatory counseling and future interventional studies to prevent complication. The incidence of positive surgical margins and occult minimally invasive carcinoma is also high, reflecting the challenging nature of treating vulvar disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9563940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95639402022-10-21 Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions Boyles, Glenn P. Weaver, Ashlee M. Cohn, David E. Backes, Floor J. Copeland, Larry J. Bixel, Kristin L. Fowler, Jeffrey M. O'Malley, David M. Cosgrove, Casey M. AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the rate of wound complications following simple vulvar excision and to identify the risk factors for these outcomes. Our secondary objectives were to determine the rates of (1) positive margins and (2) occult carcinoma in the cases of vulvar dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent simple vulvar excision procedures for suspected premalignant or benign lesions between June 2016 and February 2020. Our primary outcome was the rate of composite wound complications, including wound separation or breakdown, infection, or hematoma. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of (1) margins positive for residual dysplasia and (2) occult minimally invasive carcinoma. The Fisher exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the categorical variables and logistic regression models and independent student t tests were used for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate stepwise selection and multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for complications and generate the odds ratios. RESULTS: Of the 338 patients included in the study, 143 (42.3%) experienced wound complication. Most of these complications were wound separation or breakdown (n=134, 39.6%), followed by infection (n=22, 6.5%), and hematoma (n=4, 1.2%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of high-grade vulvar dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–3.15), longer specimen diameter (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.05), and lesion location on the perineum (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.38–3.66) were independent risk factors. With high-grade vulvar dysplasia, the rate of positive margins was 50.2% (114/227) and that of occult microinvasive carcinoma was 17.2% (39/227). Notably, the primary and secondary outcomes were similar among gynecologic oncologists and gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions are common. Select groups may benefit from anticipatory counseling and future interventional studies to prevent complication. The incidence of positive surgical margins and occult minimally invasive carcinoma is also high, reflecting the challenging nature of treating vulvar disease. Elsevier 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9563940/ /pubmed/36277453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100022 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Boyles, Glenn P.
Weaver, Ashlee M.
Cohn, David E.
Backes, Floor J.
Copeland, Larry J.
Bixel, Kristin L.
Fowler, Jeffrey M.
O'Malley, David M.
Cosgrove, Casey M.
Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions
title Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions
title_full Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions
title_fullStr Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions
title_full_unstemmed Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions
title_short Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions
title_sort wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100022
work_keys_str_mv AT boylesglennp woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT weaverashleem woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT cohndavide woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT backesfloorj woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT copelandlarryj woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT bixelkristinl woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT fowlerjeffreym woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT omalleydavidm woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions
AT cosgrovecaseym woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesions