Cargando…

Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Postabortion family planning is a major primary prevention strategy for unwanted pregnancies at which contraceptive use reduces approximately 230 million births every year worldwide. However, evidence that assesses postabortion family planning utilization and associated factors among wom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Mewujidat H., Mengistu, Mezgebu Y., Abegaz, Zinet, Bazie, Getaw W., Cherie, Niguss, Amsalu, Erkihun T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100047
_version_ 1784808538934083584
author Ali, Mewujidat H.
Mengistu, Mezgebu Y.
Abegaz, Zinet
Bazie, Getaw W.
Cherie, Niguss
Amsalu, Erkihun T.
author_facet Ali, Mewujidat H.
Mengistu, Mezgebu Y.
Abegaz, Zinet
Bazie, Getaw W.
Cherie, Niguss
Amsalu, Erkihun T.
author_sort Ali, Mewujidat H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postabortion family planning is a major primary prevention strategy for unwanted pregnancies at which contraceptive use reduces approximately 230 million births every year worldwide. However, evidence that assesses postabortion family planning utilization and associated factors among women who received abortion services at governmental and nongovernmental health facilities is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the rates of postabortion family planning utilization and associated factors among women who received abortion services at governmental and nongovernmental health facilities. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative cross-sectional study design was employed among 324 women who received abortion services. A systematic sampling technique was used to select the study participants, and data were collected by face-to-face interview using a structured questionnaire. Data were cross-checked, coded, and entered into EpiData (version 3.1; The EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) and exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 25; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) for analysis. Descriptive statistics, such as frequency, proportion, and mean with standard deviation, were computed. The association between independent variables and postabortion family planning utilization was made using a binary logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval was used as a measure of association, and variables with a P value of ≤.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The rate of postabortion family planning utilization among women who received abortion services was 71.91% (95% confidence interval, 66.74–76.56). The rates of postabortion family planning utilization at governmental and nongovernmental health facilities were 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 47.75–63.10) and 88.27% (95% confidence interval, 82.27–92.43) respectively. Being counseled about contraceptive use (adjusted odds ratio, 33.130; 95% confidence interval, 6.089–180.243), not needing near-future pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 3.350; 95% confidence interval, 1.541–7.282), and receiving abortion service at nongovernmental health facilities (adjusted odds ratio, 4.732; 95% confidence interval, 1.900–11.787) were significantly associated with postabortion family planning utilization. CONCLUSION: The rate of postabortion family planning utilization was lower among women who received abortion services at governmental health facilities than among women who received abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities. Counseling about contraceptive use, need for near-future pregnancy, and type of health facility were significantly associated with postabortion family planning utilization. Therefore, efforts are needed to promote and strengthen the counseling of contraceptive use and birth spacing of women who are receiving abortion services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95640182022-10-21 Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study Ali, Mewujidat H. Mengistu, Mezgebu Y. Abegaz, Zinet Bazie, Getaw W. Cherie, Niguss Amsalu, Erkihun T. AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Postabortion family planning is a major primary prevention strategy for unwanted pregnancies at which contraceptive use reduces approximately 230 million births every year worldwide. However, evidence that assesses postabortion family planning utilization and associated factors among women who received abortion services at governmental and nongovernmental health facilities is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the rates of postabortion family planning utilization and associated factors among women who received abortion services at governmental and nongovernmental health facilities. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative cross-sectional study design was employed among 324 women who received abortion services. A systematic sampling technique was used to select the study participants, and data were collected by face-to-face interview using a structured questionnaire. Data were cross-checked, coded, and entered into EpiData (version 3.1; The EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) and exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 25; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) for analysis. Descriptive statistics, such as frequency, proportion, and mean with standard deviation, were computed. The association between independent variables and postabortion family planning utilization was made using a binary logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval was used as a measure of association, and variables with a P value of ≤.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The rate of postabortion family planning utilization among women who received abortion services was 71.91% (95% confidence interval, 66.74–76.56). The rates of postabortion family planning utilization at governmental and nongovernmental health facilities were 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 47.75–63.10) and 88.27% (95% confidence interval, 82.27–92.43) respectively. Being counseled about contraceptive use (adjusted odds ratio, 33.130; 95% confidence interval, 6.089–180.243), not needing near-future pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 3.350; 95% confidence interval, 1.541–7.282), and receiving abortion service at nongovernmental health facilities (adjusted odds ratio, 4.732; 95% confidence interval, 1.900–11.787) were significantly associated with postabortion family planning utilization. CONCLUSION: The rate of postabortion family planning utilization was lower among women who received abortion services at governmental health facilities than among women who received abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities. Counseling about contraceptive use, need for near-future pregnancy, and type of health facility were significantly associated with postabortion family planning utilization. Therefore, efforts are needed to promote and strengthen the counseling of contraceptive use and birth spacing of women who are receiving abortion services. Elsevier 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9564018/ /pubmed/36274970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100047 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ali, Mewujidat H.
Mengistu, Mezgebu Y.
Abegaz, Zinet
Bazie, Getaw W.
Cherie, Niguss
Amsalu, Erkihun T.
Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study
title Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_full Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_short Receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_sort receiving abortion services at nongovernmental health facilities as a significant variable for postabortion family planning utilization: a comparative cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100047
work_keys_str_mv AT alimewujidath receivingabortionservicesatnongovernmentalhealthfacilitiesasasignificantvariableforpostabortionfamilyplanningutilizationacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT mengistumezgebuy receivingabortionservicesatnongovernmentalhealthfacilitiesasasignificantvariableforpostabortionfamilyplanningutilizationacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT abegazzinet receivingabortionservicesatnongovernmentalhealthfacilitiesasasignificantvariableforpostabortionfamilyplanningutilizationacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT baziegetaww receivingabortionservicesatnongovernmentalhealthfacilitiesasasignificantvariableforpostabortionfamilyplanningutilizationacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT cherieniguss receivingabortionservicesatnongovernmentalhealthfacilitiesasasignificantvariableforpostabortionfamilyplanningutilizationacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT amsaluerkihunt receivingabortionservicesatnongovernmentalhealthfacilitiesasasignificantvariableforpostabortionfamilyplanningutilizationacomparativecrosssectionalstudy