Cargando…
Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review
Peer review is a well-established cornerstone of the scientific process, yet it is not immune to biases like status bias, which we explore in this paper. Merton described this bias as prominent researchers getting disproportionately great credit for their contribution, while relatively unknown resea...
Autores principales: | Huber, Jürgen, Inoua, Sabiou, Kerschbamer, Rudolf, König-Kersting, Christian, Palan, Stefan, Smith, Vernon L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205779119 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Muller’s nobel prize research and peer review
por: Calabrese, Edward J
Publicado: (2018) -
The Nobel prize annual 1992
por: Loucks, Vernon R
Publicado: (1993) -
How to get published in a standard peer-reviewed medical journal: Some useful tips for novice authors
por: Aziz, Anbreen
Publicado: (2020) -
The enactment of physician-authors in Nobel Prize nominations
por: Hansson, Nils, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
An analysis of emotions and the prominence of positivity in #BlackLivesMatter tweets
por: Field, Anjalie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)