Cargando…

Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF

INTRODUCTION: Traditional categorical classifications of personality disorders (PD) have been criticized for insufficient structural and cross-cultural validity. In the DSM-5 Section III, alternative model of the PDs (AMPD), the maladaptive personality traits are divided into five domains: negative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zinchuk, M., Kustov, G., Gersamija, A., Yakovlev, A., Pashnin, E., Voinova, N., Popova, S., Guekht, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564255/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.948
_version_ 1784808596131807232
author Zinchuk, M.
Kustov, G.
Gersamija, A.
Yakovlev, A.
Pashnin, E.
Voinova, N.
Popova, S.
Guekht, A.
author_facet Zinchuk, M.
Kustov, G.
Gersamija, A.
Yakovlev, A.
Pashnin, E.
Voinova, N.
Popova, S.
Guekht, A.
author_sort Zinchuk, M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Traditional categorical classifications of personality disorders (PD) have been criticized for insufficient structural and cross-cultural validity. In the DSM-5 Section III, alternative model of the PDs (AMPD), the maladaptive personality traits are divided into five domains: negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition and psychoticism. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is a 25-item self-report questionnaire that measures the severity of each of these five domains. To date, no questionnaires assessing pathological personality traits following the AMPD have been validated in Russia. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF. METHODS: Five hundred and 86 (female - 505 (86,2%), age - 18–77 years (M - 28.2, SD - 11.5)) consecutive inpatients with non-psychotic mental disorders were assessed with the Russian language version of the PID-5-BF. Exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) with Robust Diagonally Weighted Least Squares method of extraction and Robust Equamax rotation was performed in Factor v 11.04.02. RESULTS: The results of the ESEM analysis showed good fit of the five-factor model (CFI - 0.982; TLI - 0.971; RMSEA (95% CI) - 0.036 (0.01-0.05). Most of the items had the highest factor loadings on their mother domains. However, two items showed weak loadings on their designated factors (<0.4), and attention seeking item had a primary load to (low) detachment instead of antagonism. CONCLUSIONS: The PID-5-BF was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the evaluation of the AMPD trait domain DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95642552022-10-17 Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF Zinchuk, M. Kustov, G. Gersamija, A. Yakovlev, A. Pashnin, E. Voinova, N. Popova, S. Guekht, A. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Traditional categorical classifications of personality disorders (PD) have been criticized for insufficient structural and cross-cultural validity. In the DSM-5 Section III, alternative model of the PDs (AMPD), the maladaptive personality traits are divided into five domains: negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition and psychoticism. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is a 25-item self-report questionnaire that measures the severity of each of these five domains. To date, no questionnaires assessing pathological personality traits following the AMPD have been validated in Russia. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF. METHODS: Five hundred and 86 (female - 505 (86,2%), age - 18–77 years (M - 28.2, SD - 11.5)) consecutive inpatients with non-psychotic mental disorders were assessed with the Russian language version of the PID-5-BF. Exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) with Robust Diagonally Weighted Least Squares method of extraction and Robust Equamax rotation was performed in Factor v 11.04.02. RESULTS: The results of the ESEM analysis showed good fit of the five-factor model (CFI - 0.982; TLI - 0.971; RMSEA (95% CI) - 0.036 (0.01-0.05). Most of the items had the highest factor loadings on their mother domains. However, two items showed weak loadings on their designated factors (<0.4), and attention seeking item had a primary load to (low) detachment instead of antagonism. CONCLUSIONS: The PID-5-BF was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the evaluation of the AMPD trait domain DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9564255/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.948 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Zinchuk, M.
Kustov, G.
Gersamija, A.
Yakovlev, A.
Pashnin, E.
Voinova, N.
Popova, S.
Guekht, A.
Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF
title Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF
title_full Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF
title_fullStr Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF
title_short Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF
title_sort evaluation of the factor structure of the russian version of pid-5-bf
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564255/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.948
work_keys_str_mv AT zinchukm evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf
AT kustovg evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf
AT gersamijaa evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf
AT yakovleva evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf
AT pashnine evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf
AT voinovan evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf
AT popovas evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf
AT guekhta evaluationofthefactorstructureoftherussianversionofpid5bf