Cargando…

Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro

While current psychiatric treatments, especially pharmacological ones, are mainly based on initially serendipous findings, recent developments in many research areas promise unprecendented advances in translation to clinical application. The advent of large scale multiomics with single cell resoluti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Binder, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564340/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.44
_version_ 1784808618238935040
author Binder, E.
author_facet Binder, E.
author_sort Binder, E.
collection PubMed
description While current psychiatric treatments, especially pharmacological ones, are mainly based on initially serendipous findings, recent developments in many research areas promise unprecendented advances in translation to clinical application. The advent of large scale multiomics with single cell resolution, patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells that can be differentiated to brain cells and even form cerebral organoids as well as the possilibility to generate humanized animal models using CRISPR-technologies have been exciting developments on the molecular and cellular side. These advances are paralleled by new technologies to increase resolution in brain imaging and electrophysiological measures as well as brain stimulation techniques. In addition, we have now access to multilevel data from very large cohorts, increasingly with longitudinal measures and using data collection with digital devices and wearables. Artificial intelligence methods open new possibilities to analyze these large scale, multilevel datasets in unbiased ways. This side of the debate will highlight the translational potential of these advances in research possiblities, giving examples from the areas of novel pharmacological treatments and personalized medicine among others. Furthermore, it will highlight how a better understanding of risk factors, genetic, social and environmental, can lead to improvements in prevention programs. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95643402022-10-17 Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro Binder, E. Eur Psychiatry Clinical/Therapeutic While current psychiatric treatments, especially pharmacological ones, are mainly based on initially serendipous findings, recent developments in many research areas promise unprecendented advances in translation to clinical application. The advent of large scale multiomics with single cell resolution, patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells that can be differentiated to brain cells and even form cerebral organoids as well as the possilibility to generate humanized animal models using CRISPR-technologies have been exciting developments on the molecular and cellular side. These advances are paralleled by new technologies to increase resolution in brain imaging and electrophysiological measures as well as brain stimulation techniques. In addition, we have now access to multilevel data from very large cohorts, increasingly with longitudinal measures and using data collection with digital devices and wearables. Artificial intelligence methods open new possibilities to analyze these large scale, multilevel datasets in unbiased ways. This side of the debate will highlight the translational potential of these advances in research possiblities, giving examples from the areas of novel pharmacological treatments and personalized medicine among others. Furthermore, it will highlight how a better understanding of risk factors, genetic, social and environmental, can lead to improvements in prevention programs. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9564340/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.44 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical/Therapeutic
Binder, E.
Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro
title Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro
title_full Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro
title_fullStr Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro
title_full_unstemmed Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro
title_short Has Clinical Translation of Scientific Research been a Failure?: Pro
title_sort has clinical translation of scientific research been a failure?: pro
topic Clinical/Therapeutic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564340/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.44
work_keys_str_mv AT bindere hasclinicaltranslationofscientificresearchbeenafailurepro