Cargando…

Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study

INTRODUCTION: In this open‐label, randomized controlled, non‐inferiority, multicenter study we aimed to study the risk of termination of pregnancy within 1 year postpartum, the safety profile and patient acceptability after early postpartum insertion of a hormonal intrauterine device (LNG‐IUS, Miren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Karin, Kopp Kallner, Helena, Brynhildsen, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14331
_version_ 1784808640136347648
author Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Karin
Kopp Kallner, Helena
Brynhildsen, Jan
author_facet Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Karin
Kopp Kallner, Helena
Brynhildsen, Jan
author_sort Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Karin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In this open‐label, randomized controlled, non‐inferiority, multicenter study we aimed to study the risk of termination of pregnancy within 1 year postpartum, the safety profile and patient acceptability after early postpartum insertion of a hormonal intrauterine device (LNG‐IUS, Mirena®) compared with standard placement 6–8 weeks postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: April 2018 to January 2020 women with uncomplicated vaginal delivery at four urban birth centers in Sweden, were randomized to either early placement within 48 h after delivery (early group) or standard placement 6–8 weeks postpartum (standard group) of a hormonal intrauterine device. The main outcome measure was the proportion of terminations of pregnancies in each group during the first year after placement of the intrauterine device. Registration EudraCT database no. 2017–001945‐29. RESULTS: The study was prematurely stopped according to the protocol due to an expulsion rate >20% in the early group. No pregnancies occurred. Fifty‐two women were randomized to early and 49 women to standard insertion. In the early group, 23/52 (44.2%) of the intrauterine devices were expelled. After expulsion, 10 women chose to have another hormonal intrauterine device placed but still significantly fewer women (39/52, 75%, p = 0.22) in the early group used the hormonal intrauterine device method at study completion. No expulsions occurred in the standard group, but 5/49 (10.2%) requested removal and 41/49 (83.7%, p = 0.22) had used the hormonal intrauterine device method continuously for 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Early hormonal intrauterine device insertion after vaginal delivery is associated with high expulsion rates. Despite this, a high continuation rate of the hormonal intrauterine device method is seen among women once choosing the method. In the light of high continuation rates, the advantages of early insertion could balance the risk of expulsion for well‐informed women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95644232022-12-06 Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Karin Kopp Kallner, Helena Brynhildsen, Jan Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Contraception INTRODUCTION: In this open‐label, randomized controlled, non‐inferiority, multicenter study we aimed to study the risk of termination of pregnancy within 1 year postpartum, the safety profile and patient acceptability after early postpartum insertion of a hormonal intrauterine device (LNG‐IUS, Mirena®) compared with standard placement 6–8 weeks postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: April 2018 to January 2020 women with uncomplicated vaginal delivery at four urban birth centers in Sweden, were randomized to either early placement within 48 h after delivery (early group) or standard placement 6–8 weeks postpartum (standard group) of a hormonal intrauterine device. The main outcome measure was the proportion of terminations of pregnancies in each group during the first year after placement of the intrauterine device. Registration EudraCT database no. 2017–001945‐29. RESULTS: The study was prematurely stopped according to the protocol due to an expulsion rate >20% in the early group. No pregnancies occurred. Fifty‐two women were randomized to early and 49 women to standard insertion. In the early group, 23/52 (44.2%) of the intrauterine devices were expelled. After expulsion, 10 women chose to have another hormonal intrauterine device placed but still significantly fewer women (39/52, 75%, p = 0.22) in the early group used the hormonal intrauterine device method at study completion. No expulsions occurred in the standard group, but 5/49 (10.2%) requested removal and 41/49 (83.7%, p = 0.22) had used the hormonal intrauterine device method continuously for 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Early hormonal intrauterine device insertion after vaginal delivery is associated with high expulsion rates. Despite this, a high continuation rate of the hormonal intrauterine device method is seen among women once choosing the method. In the light of high continuation rates, the advantages of early insertion could balance the risk of expulsion for well‐informed women. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9564423/ /pubmed/35141886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14331 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Contraception
Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Karin
Kopp Kallner, Helena
Brynhildsen, Jan
Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study
title Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study
title_full Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study
title_fullStr Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study
title_short Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open‐label, randomized, multicenter study
title_sort effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal iud compared with standard procedure: an open‐label, randomized, multicenter study
topic Contraception
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14331
work_keys_str_mv AT lichtensteinliljebladkarin effectivenesssafetyandoverallsatisfactionofearlypostpartumplacementofhormonaliudcomparedwithstandardprocedureanopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT koppkallnerhelena effectivenesssafetyandoverallsatisfactionofearlypostpartumplacementofhormonaliudcomparedwithstandardprocedureanopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT brynhildsenjan effectivenesssafetyandoverallsatisfactionofearlypostpartumplacementofhormonaliudcomparedwithstandardprocedureanopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudy