Cargando…

The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences

INTRODUCTION: A second‐trimester anatomy scan may identify a suspected minor fetal anomaly and/or “soft marker,” such as choroid plexus cysts or femoral shortening. Such findings can raise a medical concern, as they could indicate severe fetal disease; however, they are also often transient or a “fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thirup, Lina, Sandager, Puk, Vogel, Ida, Lou, Stina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14288
_version_ 1784808646155173888
author Thirup, Lina
Sandager, Puk
Vogel, Ida
Lou, Stina
author_facet Thirup, Lina
Sandager, Puk
Vogel, Ida
Lou, Stina
author_sort Thirup, Lina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A second‐trimester anatomy scan may identify a suspected minor fetal anomaly and/or “soft marker,” such as choroid plexus cysts or femoral shortening. Such findings can raise a medical concern, as they could indicate severe fetal disease; however, they are also often transient or a “false alarm.” The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of pregnant women, where a medical concern was raised at the second‐trimester ultrasound scan and later discarded after follow‐up examinations and diagnostic testing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consists of qualitative, in‐depth interviews with nine women, where a minor anomaly/soft marker was identified at the second‐trimester scan and a severe anomaly was later ruled out. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The main source of worry was uncertainty about the possible implications for the pregnancy and the baby, particularly concerns about potential termination of pregnancy for a severe fetal condition. The women described four strategies to manage worry and uncertainty during the diagnostic process: (a) seeking additional information to feel more in control, and (b) using social networks to share their concerns. Some women tried to (c) mentally distance themselves from the pregnancy during the diagnostic period, while (d) extra scans could relieve worry and support attachment. The women appreciated when the fetal medicine specialist pointed to normal features in the pregnancy and the baby, as this provided some counterbalance to the sense of uncertainty. In general, the women expressed satisfaction with the information received during the diagnostic process. However, all of them were worried during the diagnostic process, and where this process was prolonged, such worry lingered even after the minor anomaly/soft marker had been discarded. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic uncertainty cannot be avoided in obstetric ultrasound and the women concerned appreciated being informed about the suspected findings even if it caused increased worry. Expedient diagnostic processes may alleviate worry, but are not always possible. Women in a prolonged diagnostic process may benefit from psychological and social support in parallel with, and even beyond, the obstetric investigation. However, further research is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95644442022-12-06 The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences Thirup, Lina Sandager, Puk Vogel, Ida Lou, Stina Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Prenatal Diagnosis INTRODUCTION: A second‐trimester anatomy scan may identify a suspected minor fetal anomaly and/or “soft marker,” such as choroid plexus cysts or femoral shortening. Such findings can raise a medical concern, as they could indicate severe fetal disease; however, they are also often transient or a “false alarm.” The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of pregnant women, where a medical concern was raised at the second‐trimester ultrasound scan and later discarded after follow‐up examinations and diagnostic testing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consists of qualitative, in‐depth interviews with nine women, where a minor anomaly/soft marker was identified at the second‐trimester scan and a severe anomaly was later ruled out. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The main source of worry was uncertainty about the possible implications for the pregnancy and the baby, particularly concerns about potential termination of pregnancy for a severe fetal condition. The women described four strategies to manage worry and uncertainty during the diagnostic process: (a) seeking additional information to feel more in control, and (b) using social networks to share their concerns. Some women tried to (c) mentally distance themselves from the pregnancy during the diagnostic period, while (d) extra scans could relieve worry and support attachment. The women appreciated when the fetal medicine specialist pointed to normal features in the pregnancy and the baby, as this provided some counterbalance to the sense of uncertainty. In general, the women expressed satisfaction with the information received during the diagnostic process. However, all of them were worried during the diagnostic process, and where this process was prolonged, such worry lingered even after the minor anomaly/soft marker had been discarded. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic uncertainty cannot be avoided in obstetric ultrasound and the women concerned appreciated being informed about the suspected findings even if it caused increased worry. Expedient diagnostic processes may alleviate worry, but are not always possible. Women in a prolonged diagnostic process may benefit from psychological and social support in parallel with, and even beyond, the obstetric investigation. However, further research is warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9564444/ /pubmed/34761374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14288 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Prenatal Diagnosis
Thirup, Lina
Sandager, Puk
Vogel, Ida
Lou, Stina
The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences
title The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences
title_full The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences
title_fullStr The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences
title_full_unstemmed The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences
title_short The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences
title_sort importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: a qualitative study of women's experiences
topic Prenatal Diagnosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14288
work_keys_str_mv AT thiruplina theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences
AT sandagerpuk theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences
AT vogelida theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences
AT loustina theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences
AT thiruplina importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences
AT sandagerpuk importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences
AT vogelida importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences
AT loustina importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences