Cargando…
The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences
INTRODUCTION: A second‐trimester anatomy scan may identify a suspected minor fetal anomaly and/or “soft marker,” such as choroid plexus cysts or femoral shortening. Such findings can raise a medical concern, as they could indicate severe fetal disease; however, they are also often transient or a “fa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14288 |
_version_ | 1784808646155173888 |
---|---|
author | Thirup, Lina Sandager, Puk Vogel, Ida Lou, Stina |
author_facet | Thirup, Lina Sandager, Puk Vogel, Ida Lou, Stina |
author_sort | Thirup, Lina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A second‐trimester anatomy scan may identify a suspected minor fetal anomaly and/or “soft marker,” such as choroid plexus cysts or femoral shortening. Such findings can raise a medical concern, as they could indicate severe fetal disease; however, they are also often transient or a “false alarm.” The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of pregnant women, where a medical concern was raised at the second‐trimester ultrasound scan and later discarded after follow‐up examinations and diagnostic testing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consists of qualitative, in‐depth interviews with nine women, where a minor anomaly/soft marker was identified at the second‐trimester scan and a severe anomaly was later ruled out. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The main source of worry was uncertainty about the possible implications for the pregnancy and the baby, particularly concerns about potential termination of pregnancy for a severe fetal condition. The women described four strategies to manage worry and uncertainty during the diagnostic process: (a) seeking additional information to feel more in control, and (b) using social networks to share their concerns. Some women tried to (c) mentally distance themselves from the pregnancy during the diagnostic period, while (d) extra scans could relieve worry and support attachment. The women appreciated when the fetal medicine specialist pointed to normal features in the pregnancy and the baby, as this provided some counterbalance to the sense of uncertainty. In general, the women expressed satisfaction with the information received during the diagnostic process. However, all of them were worried during the diagnostic process, and where this process was prolonged, such worry lingered even after the minor anomaly/soft marker had been discarded. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic uncertainty cannot be avoided in obstetric ultrasound and the women concerned appreciated being informed about the suspected findings even if it caused increased worry. Expedient diagnostic processes may alleviate worry, but are not always possible. Women in a prolonged diagnostic process may benefit from psychological and social support in parallel with, and even beyond, the obstetric investigation. However, further research is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9564444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95644442022-12-06 The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences Thirup, Lina Sandager, Puk Vogel, Ida Lou, Stina Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Prenatal Diagnosis INTRODUCTION: A second‐trimester anatomy scan may identify a suspected minor fetal anomaly and/or “soft marker,” such as choroid plexus cysts or femoral shortening. Such findings can raise a medical concern, as they could indicate severe fetal disease; however, they are also often transient or a “false alarm.” The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of pregnant women, where a medical concern was raised at the second‐trimester ultrasound scan and later discarded after follow‐up examinations and diagnostic testing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consists of qualitative, in‐depth interviews with nine women, where a minor anomaly/soft marker was identified at the second‐trimester scan and a severe anomaly was later ruled out. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The main source of worry was uncertainty about the possible implications for the pregnancy and the baby, particularly concerns about potential termination of pregnancy for a severe fetal condition. The women described four strategies to manage worry and uncertainty during the diagnostic process: (a) seeking additional information to feel more in control, and (b) using social networks to share their concerns. Some women tried to (c) mentally distance themselves from the pregnancy during the diagnostic period, while (d) extra scans could relieve worry and support attachment. The women appreciated when the fetal medicine specialist pointed to normal features in the pregnancy and the baby, as this provided some counterbalance to the sense of uncertainty. In general, the women expressed satisfaction with the information received during the diagnostic process. However, all of them were worried during the diagnostic process, and where this process was prolonged, such worry lingered even after the minor anomaly/soft marker had been discarded. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic uncertainty cannot be avoided in obstetric ultrasound and the women concerned appreciated being informed about the suspected findings even if it caused increased worry. Expedient diagnostic processes may alleviate worry, but are not always possible. Women in a prolonged diagnostic process may benefit from psychological and social support in parallel with, and even beyond, the obstetric investigation. However, further research is warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9564444/ /pubmed/34761374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14288 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Prenatal Diagnosis Thirup, Lina Sandager, Puk Vogel, Ida Lou, Stina The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences |
title | The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences |
title_full | The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences |
title_fullStr | The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences |
title_short | The importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences |
title_sort | importance of information and support following a suspected second‐trimester anomaly that is later discarded: a qualitative study of women's experiences |
topic | Prenatal Diagnosis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thiruplina theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences AT sandagerpuk theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences AT vogelida theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences AT loustina theimportanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences AT thiruplina importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences AT sandagerpuk importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences AT vogelida importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences AT loustina importanceofinformationandsupportfollowingasuspectedsecondtrimesteranomalythatislaterdiscardedaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiences |