Cargando…

Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants

The operational costs of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are mainly driven by electric power consumption, making the energy-efficient operation an all-time present target for engineers and operators. A well known approach to reduce the demand for purchased electricity is the operation of an anae...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumgartner, Thomas, Jahn, Lydia, Parravicini, Vanessa, Svardal, Karl, Krampe, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912871
_version_ 1784808653242499072
author Baumgartner, Thomas
Jahn, Lydia
Parravicini, Vanessa
Svardal, Karl
Krampe, Jörg
author_facet Baumgartner, Thomas
Jahn, Lydia
Parravicini, Vanessa
Svardal, Karl
Krampe, Jörg
author_sort Baumgartner, Thomas
collection PubMed
description The operational costs of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are mainly driven by electric power consumption, making the energy-efficient operation an all-time present target for engineers and operators. A well known approach to reduce the demand for purchased electricity is the operation of an anaerobic sludge stabilisation process. Although anaerobic digesters make it possible to recover large quantities of energy-rich methane gas, additional strategies are required to handle the increased internal return flow of nitrogen, which arises with the sludge dewatering effluent (SDE). SDE treatment increases the oxygen demand and in turn the energy required for aeration. In this study, different SDE treatment processes were compared with regard to the treatment in mainstream, sidestream nitritation, as well as nitritation combined with anammox for two-stage and single-stage WWTPs. Although SDE treatment in sidestream nitritation was found to have no effect on the energy demand of single-stage WWTPs, this concept allows the treatment capacity in the activated sludge tank to be raised, while contributing to a high nitrogen removal under carbon limitation. In contrast, SDE sidestream treatment showed great potential for saving energy at two-stage WWTPs, whereby sidestream nitritation and the further treatment in the first stage was found to be the most efficient concept, with a savings of approx. 11% of the aeration energy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95644722022-10-15 Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants Baumgartner, Thomas Jahn, Lydia Parravicini, Vanessa Svardal, Karl Krampe, Jörg Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The operational costs of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are mainly driven by electric power consumption, making the energy-efficient operation an all-time present target for engineers and operators. A well known approach to reduce the demand for purchased electricity is the operation of an anaerobic sludge stabilisation process. Although anaerobic digesters make it possible to recover large quantities of energy-rich methane gas, additional strategies are required to handle the increased internal return flow of nitrogen, which arises with the sludge dewatering effluent (SDE). SDE treatment increases the oxygen demand and in turn the energy required for aeration. In this study, different SDE treatment processes were compared with regard to the treatment in mainstream, sidestream nitritation, as well as nitritation combined with anammox for two-stage and single-stage WWTPs. Although SDE treatment in sidestream nitritation was found to have no effect on the energy demand of single-stage WWTPs, this concept allows the treatment capacity in the activated sludge tank to be raised, while contributing to a high nitrogen removal under carbon limitation. In contrast, SDE sidestream treatment showed great potential for saving energy at two-stage WWTPs, whereby sidestream nitritation and the further treatment in the first stage was found to be the most efficient concept, with a savings of approx. 11% of the aeration energy. MDPI 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9564472/ /pubmed/36232171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912871 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baumgartner, Thomas
Jahn, Lydia
Parravicini, Vanessa
Svardal, Karl
Krampe, Jörg
Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants
title Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants
title_full Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants
title_fullStr Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants
title_short Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants
title_sort efficiency of sidestream nitritation for modern two-stage activated sludge plants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912871
work_keys_str_mv AT baumgartnerthomas efficiencyofsidestreamnitritationformoderntwostageactivatedsludgeplants
AT jahnlydia efficiencyofsidestreamnitritationformoderntwostageactivatedsludgeplants
AT parravicinivanessa efficiencyofsidestreamnitritationformoderntwostageactivatedsludgeplants
AT svardalkarl efficiencyofsidestreamnitritationformoderntwostageactivatedsludgeplants
AT krampejorg efficiencyofsidestreamnitritationformoderntwostageactivatedsludgeplants