Cargando…

Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program

Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first‐trimester screening and cell‐free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix, Glad, Ragnhild, Sitras, Vasilis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14351
_version_ 1784808673025982464
author Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix
Glad, Ragnhild
Sitras, Vasilis
author_facet Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix
Glad, Ragnhild
Sitras, Vasilis
author_sort Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix
collection PubMed
description Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first‐trimester screening and cell‐free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a public antenatal care program is difficult, because many patients, politicians, and medical professionals do not consider trisomy 21 a severe medical disease. Screening for trisomies at an early gestation might inevitably lead to an increase in pregnancy terminations and making cost–benefit calculations is ethically challenging. Moreover, offering NIPT to all pregnant women is debatable because of the lower prevalence of fetal trisomies in younger women. Therefore, appropriate genetic pre‐test counseling is essential. Furthermore, organizing the service between private institutions and public hospitals poses another debate and challenges both quality and equal access to health services for women across the country.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95645522022-12-06 Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix Glad, Ragnhild Sitras, Vasilis Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Controversies Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first‐trimester screening and cell‐free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a public antenatal care program is difficult, because many patients, politicians, and medical professionals do not consider trisomy 21 a severe medical disease. Screening for trisomies at an early gestation might inevitably lead to an increase in pregnancy terminations and making cost–benefit calculations is ethically challenging. Moreover, offering NIPT to all pregnant women is debatable because of the lower prevalence of fetal trisomies in younger women. Therefore, appropriate genetic pre‐test counseling is essential. Furthermore, organizing the service between private institutions and public hospitals poses another debate and challenges both quality and equal access to health services for women across the country. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9564552/ /pubmed/35332520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14351 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Controversies
Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix
Glad, Ragnhild
Sitras, Vasilis
Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
title Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
title_full Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
title_fullStr Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
title_full_unstemmed Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
title_short Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
title_sort controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
topic Controversies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14351
work_keys_str_mv AT salvesenkjellasmundblix controversiesinimplementingnoninvasiveprenataltestinginapublicantenatalcareprogram
AT gladragnhild controversiesinimplementingnoninvasiveprenataltestinginapublicantenatalcareprogram
AT sitrasvasilis controversiesinimplementingnoninvasiveprenataltestinginapublicantenatalcareprogram