Cargando…
Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program
Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first‐trimester screening and cell‐free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14351 |
_version_ | 1784808673025982464 |
---|---|
author | Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix Glad, Ragnhild Sitras, Vasilis |
author_facet | Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix Glad, Ragnhild Sitras, Vasilis |
author_sort | Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix |
collection | PubMed |
description | Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first‐trimester screening and cell‐free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a public antenatal care program is difficult, because many patients, politicians, and medical professionals do not consider trisomy 21 a severe medical disease. Screening for trisomies at an early gestation might inevitably lead to an increase in pregnancy terminations and making cost–benefit calculations is ethically challenging. Moreover, offering NIPT to all pregnant women is debatable because of the lower prevalence of fetal trisomies in younger women. Therefore, appropriate genetic pre‐test counseling is essential. Furthermore, organizing the service between private institutions and public hospitals poses another debate and challenges both quality and equal access to health services for women across the country. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9564552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95645522022-12-06 Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix Glad, Ragnhild Sitras, Vasilis Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Controversies Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first‐trimester screening and cell‐free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a public antenatal care program is difficult, because many patients, politicians, and medical professionals do not consider trisomy 21 a severe medical disease. Screening for trisomies at an early gestation might inevitably lead to an increase in pregnancy terminations and making cost–benefit calculations is ethically challenging. Moreover, offering NIPT to all pregnant women is debatable because of the lower prevalence of fetal trisomies in younger women. Therefore, appropriate genetic pre‐test counseling is essential. Furthermore, organizing the service between private institutions and public hospitals poses another debate and challenges both quality and equal access to health services for women across the country. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9564552/ /pubmed/35332520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14351 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Controversies Salvesen, Kjell Åsmund Blix Glad, Ragnhild Sitras, Vasilis Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program |
title | Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program |
title_full | Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program |
title_fullStr | Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program |
title_full_unstemmed | Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program |
title_short | Controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program |
title_sort | controversies in implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program |
topic | Controversies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salvesenkjellasmundblix controversiesinimplementingnoninvasiveprenataltestinginapublicantenatalcareprogram AT gladragnhild controversiesinimplementingnoninvasiveprenataltestinginapublicantenatalcareprogram AT sitrasvasilis controversiesinimplementingnoninvasiveprenataltestinginapublicantenatalcareprogram |