Cargando…

Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study

INTRODUCTION: A pandemic may negatively influence psychological well‐being in the individual. We aimed to assess the potential influence of the first national lockdown in Denmark (March to June 2020) due to the COVID‐19 pandemic on psychological well‐being and the content and degree of worries among...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broberg, Lotte, Rom, Ane L., de Wolff, Mie G., Høgh, Stinne, Nathan, Nina O., Paarlberg, Louise D., Christensen, Karl B., Damm, Peter, Hegaard, Hanne Kristine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14303
_version_ 1784808680211873792
author Broberg, Lotte
Rom, Ane L.
de Wolff, Mie G.
Høgh, Stinne
Nathan, Nina O.
Paarlberg, Louise D.
Christensen, Karl B.
Damm, Peter
Hegaard, Hanne Kristine
author_facet Broberg, Lotte
Rom, Ane L.
de Wolff, Mie G.
Høgh, Stinne
Nathan, Nina O.
Paarlberg, Louise D.
Christensen, Karl B.
Damm, Peter
Hegaard, Hanne Kristine
author_sort Broberg, Lotte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A pandemic may negatively influence psychological well‐being in the individual. We aimed to assess the potential influence of the first national lockdown in Denmark (March to June 2020) due to the COVID‐19 pandemic on psychological well‐being and the content and degree of worries among pregnant women in early pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this hospital‐based cross‐sectional study based on self‐reported data we compared psychological well‐being and worries among women who were pregnant during the first phase of the pandemic (COVID‐19 group) (n = 685), with women who were pregnant the year before (Historical group) (n = 787). Psychological well‐being was measured by the five‐item World Health Organization Well‐being Index (WHO‐5), using a score ≤50 as indicator of reduced psychological well‐being. Differences in WHO‐5 mean scores and in the prevalence of women with score ≤50 were assessed using general linear and log‐binomial regression analyses. The Cambridge Worry Scale was used to measure the content and degree of major worries. To detect differences between groups, Pearson’s Chi‐square test was used. RESULTS: We found no differences in mean WHO‐5 score between groups (mean difference) 0.1 (95% CI −1.5 to 1.6) or in the prevalence of women with WHO‐5 score ≤50 (prevalence ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.83–1.29) in adjusted analyses. A larger proportion of women in the COVID‐19 group reported major worries about Relationship with husband/partner compared with the Historical group (3% [n = 19] vs 1% [n = 6], p = 0.04), and 9.2% in the COVID‐19 group worried about the possible negative influence of the COVID‐19 restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that national restrictions due to the COVID‐19 pandemic did not influence the psychological well‐being or the content and degree of major worries among pregnant women. However, a larger proportion of women in the COVID‐19 group reported major worries concerning Relationship with husband/partner compared with the Historical group and 9.2% in the COVID‐19 group worried about the possible negative influence of the COVID‐19 restrictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95645822022-12-06 Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study Broberg, Lotte Rom, Ane L. de Wolff, Mie G. Høgh, Stinne Nathan, Nina O. Paarlberg, Louise D. Christensen, Karl B. Damm, Peter Hegaard, Hanne Kristine Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Pregnancy INTRODUCTION: A pandemic may negatively influence psychological well‐being in the individual. We aimed to assess the potential influence of the first national lockdown in Denmark (March to June 2020) due to the COVID‐19 pandemic on psychological well‐being and the content and degree of worries among pregnant women in early pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this hospital‐based cross‐sectional study based on self‐reported data we compared psychological well‐being and worries among women who were pregnant during the first phase of the pandemic (COVID‐19 group) (n = 685), with women who were pregnant the year before (Historical group) (n = 787). Psychological well‐being was measured by the five‐item World Health Organization Well‐being Index (WHO‐5), using a score ≤50 as indicator of reduced psychological well‐being. Differences in WHO‐5 mean scores and in the prevalence of women with score ≤50 were assessed using general linear and log‐binomial regression analyses. The Cambridge Worry Scale was used to measure the content and degree of major worries. To detect differences between groups, Pearson’s Chi‐square test was used. RESULTS: We found no differences in mean WHO‐5 score between groups (mean difference) 0.1 (95% CI −1.5 to 1.6) or in the prevalence of women with WHO‐5 score ≤50 (prevalence ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.83–1.29) in adjusted analyses. A larger proportion of women in the COVID‐19 group reported major worries about Relationship with husband/partner compared with the Historical group (3% [n = 19] vs 1% [n = 6], p = 0.04), and 9.2% in the COVID‐19 group worried about the possible negative influence of the COVID‐19 restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that national restrictions due to the COVID‐19 pandemic did not influence the psychological well‐being or the content and degree of major worries among pregnant women. However, a larger proportion of women in the COVID‐19 group reported major worries concerning Relationship with husband/partner compared with the Historical group and 9.2% in the COVID‐19 group worried about the possible negative influence of the COVID‐19 restrictions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9564582/ /pubmed/34904223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14303 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Pregnancy
Broberg, Lotte
Rom, Ane L.
de Wolff, Mie G.
Høgh, Stinne
Nathan, Nina O.
Paarlberg, Louise D.
Christensen, Karl B.
Damm, Peter
Hegaard, Hanne Kristine
Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study
title Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study
title_full Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study
title_short Psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark compared with a historical group: A hospital‐based cross‐sectional study
title_sort psychological well‐being and worries among pregnant women in the first trimester during the early phase of the covid‐19 pandemic in denmark compared with a historical group: a hospital‐based cross‐sectional study
topic Pregnancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14303
work_keys_str_mv AT broberglotte psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT romanel psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT dewolffmieg psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT høghstinne psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT nathanninao psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT paarlberglouised psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT christensenkarlb psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT dammpeter psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT hegaardhannekristine psychologicalwellbeingandworriesamongpregnantwomeninthefirsttrimesterduringtheearlyphaseofthecovid19pandemicindenmarkcomparedwithahistoricalgroupahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy