Cargando…

Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium

The accuracy of five failure criterions employed in the study of periodontal ligaments (PDL) during periodontal breakdown under orthodontic movements was assessed. Based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations, nine 3D models of the second lower premolar with intact periodontium were cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moga, Radu Andrei, Buru, Stefan Marius, Olteanu, Cristian Doru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912424
_version_ 1784808696833900544
author Moga, Radu Andrei
Buru, Stefan Marius
Olteanu, Cristian Doru
author_facet Moga, Radu Andrei
Buru, Stefan Marius
Olteanu, Cristian Doru
author_sort Moga, Radu Andrei
collection PubMed
description The accuracy of five failure criterions employed in the study of periodontal ligaments (PDL) during periodontal breakdown under orthodontic movements was assessed. Based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations, nine 3D models of the second lower premolar with intact periodontium were created and individually subjected to various levels of horizontal bone loss. 0.5 N of intrusion, extrusion, rotation, tipping, and translation was applied. A finite Elements Analysis (FEA) was performed, and stresses were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. In intact periodontium, Tresca and Von Mises (VM) stresses were lower than maximum physiological hydrostatic pressure (MHP), while maximum principal stress S1, minimum principal stress S3, and pressure were higher. In reduced periodontium, Tresca and VM stresses were lower than MHP for intrusion, extrusion, and the apical third of the periodontal ligament for the other movements. 0.5 N of rotation, translation and tipping induced cervical third stress exceeding MHP. Only Tresca (quantitatively more accurate) and VM are adequate for the study of PDL (resemblance to ductile), being qualitatively similar. A 0.5 N force seems safe in the intact periodontium, and for intrusion and extrusion up to 8 mm bone loss. The amount of force should be reduced to 0.1–0.2 N for rotation, 0.15–0.3 N for translation and 0.2–0.4 N for tipping in 4–8 mm periodontal breakdown. S1, S3, and pressure criteria provided only qualitative results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95646472022-10-15 Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium Moga, Radu Andrei Buru, Stefan Marius Olteanu, Cristian Doru Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The accuracy of five failure criterions employed in the study of periodontal ligaments (PDL) during periodontal breakdown under orthodontic movements was assessed. Based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations, nine 3D models of the second lower premolar with intact periodontium were created and individually subjected to various levels of horizontal bone loss. 0.5 N of intrusion, extrusion, rotation, tipping, and translation was applied. A finite Elements Analysis (FEA) was performed, and stresses were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. In intact periodontium, Tresca and Von Mises (VM) stresses were lower than maximum physiological hydrostatic pressure (MHP), while maximum principal stress S1, minimum principal stress S3, and pressure were higher. In reduced periodontium, Tresca and VM stresses were lower than MHP for intrusion, extrusion, and the apical third of the periodontal ligament for the other movements. 0.5 N of rotation, translation and tipping induced cervical third stress exceeding MHP. Only Tresca (quantitatively more accurate) and VM are adequate for the study of PDL (resemblance to ductile), being qualitatively similar. A 0.5 N force seems safe in the intact periodontium, and for intrusion and extrusion up to 8 mm bone loss. The amount of force should be reduced to 0.1–0.2 N for rotation, 0.15–0.3 N for translation and 0.2–0.4 N for tipping in 4–8 mm periodontal breakdown. S1, S3, and pressure criteria provided only qualitative results. MDPI 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9564647/ /pubmed/36231719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912424 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moga, Radu Andrei
Buru, Stefan Marius
Olteanu, Cristian Doru
Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium
title Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium
title_full Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium
title_fullStr Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium
title_short Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium
title_sort assessment of the best fea failure criteria (part i): investigation of the biomechanical behavior of pdl in intact and reduced periodontium
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912424
work_keys_str_mv AT mogaraduandrei assessmentofthebestfeafailurecriteriapartiinvestigationofthebiomechanicalbehaviorofpdlinintactandreducedperiodontium
AT burustefanmarius assessmentofthebestfeafailurecriteriapartiinvestigationofthebiomechanicalbehaviorofpdlinintactandreducedperiodontium
AT olteanucristiandoru assessmentofthebestfeafailurecriteriapartiinvestigationofthebiomechanicalbehaviorofpdlinintactandreducedperiodontium