Cargando…

Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal upper-limb range of motion (ROM) profile for the catch phase of the clean movement (CPCM) and to identify the key ROMs for performing the CPCM in CrossFit(®) athletes. Methods: A prospective cohort study of twenty CrossFit(®) athletes ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cejudo, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232285
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912985
_version_ 1784808731403354112
author Cejudo, Antonio
author_facet Cejudo, Antonio
author_sort Cejudo, Antonio
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal upper-limb range of motion (ROM) profile for the catch phase of the clean movement (CPCM) and to identify the key ROMs for performing the CPCM in CrossFit(®) athletes. Methods: A prospective cohort study of twenty CrossFit(®) athletes aged 20–36 years was conducted. Data were collected regarding age, anthropometrics, CrossFit(®) training experience and upper-limb ROM. The ROM was measured using the ROM-SPORT method. After 7 months, athletes performed a clean movement with a load of 80% one repetition maximum. A Bayesian Student’s t-analysis, binary logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis were performed. Results: The optimal upper-limb ROM profile that predicted correct CPCM performance was 78° in shoulder extension, 173° in shoulder flexion, 107° in shoulder external rotation, 89° in shoulder internal rotation, 153° in elbow flexion, 99° in elbow pronation and 92° in wrist extension (area under the curve ≥ 651; positive predictive value ≥ 80%). Shoulder external rotation, elbow pronation and wrist extension were found to be the most important ROMs for the efficient and safe performance of CPCM (area under the curve ≥ 854; positive predictive value ≥ 85.7%). Conclusion: The upper-limb ROM profile is associated with proper clean performance. Further studies are warranted to determine whether improving flexibility on upper-limb ROM may improve proper clean movement performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95647832022-10-15 Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study Cejudo, Antonio Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal upper-limb range of motion (ROM) profile for the catch phase of the clean movement (CPCM) and to identify the key ROMs for performing the CPCM in CrossFit(®) athletes. Methods: A prospective cohort study of twenty CrossFit(®) athletes aged 20–36 years was conducted. Data were collected regarding age, anthropometrics, CrossFit(®) training experience and upper-limb ROM. The ROM was measured using the ROM-SPORT method. After 7 months, athletes performed a clean movement with a load of 80% one repetition maximum. A Bayesian Student’s t-analysis, binary logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis were performed. Results: The optimal upper-limb ROM profile that predicted correct CPCM performance was 78° in shoulder extension, 173° in shoulder flexion, 107° in shoulder external rotation, 89° in shoulder internal rotation, 153° in elbow flexion, 99° in elbow pronation and 92° in wrist extension (area under the curve ≥ 651; positive predictive value ≥ 80%). Shoulder external rotation, elbow pronation and wrist extension were found to be the most important ROMs for the efficient and safe performance of CPCM (area under the curve ≥ 854; positive predictive value ≥ 85.7%). Conclusion: The upper-limb ROM profile is associated with proper clean performance. Further studies are warranted to determine whether improving flexibility on upper-limb ROM may improve proper clean movement performance. MDPI 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9564783/ /pubmed/36232285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912985 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cejudo, Antonio
Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study
title Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit(®) Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort predicting the clean movement technique in crossfit(®) athletes using an optimal upper-limb range of motion: a prospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232285
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912985
work_keys_str_mv AT cejudoantonio predictingthecleanmovementtechniqueincrossfitathletesusinganoptimalupperlimbrangeofmotionaprospectivecohortstudy