Cargando…

Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals

(1) Background: Young non-obese insulin-resistant (IR) individuals could be at risk of developing metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus. The protective effect of physical activity in this apparently healthy group is expected but not well characterized. In this study, clinically relev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AlMuraikhy, Shamma, Anwardeen, Najeha, Naeem, Aisha, Sellami, Maha, Domling, Alexander, Agouni, Abdelali, Elrayess, Mohamed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912169
_version_ 1784808755698860032
author AlMuraikhy, Shamma
Anwardeen, Najeha
Naeem, Aisha
Sellami, Maha
Domling, Alexander
Agouni, Abdelali
Elrayess, Mohamed A.
author_facet AlMuraikhy, Shamma
Anwardeen, Najeha
Naeem, Aisha
Sellami, Maha
Domling, Alexander
Agouni, Abdelali
Elrayess, Mohamed A.
author_sort AlMuraikhy, Shamma
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Young non-obese insulin-resistant (IR) individuals could be at risk of developing metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus. The protective effect of physical activity in this apparently healthy group is expected but not well characterized. In this study, clinically relevant metabolic profiles were determined and compared among active and sedentary insulin-sensitive (IS) and IR young non-obese individuals. (2) Methods: Data obtained from Qatar Biobank for 2110 young (20–30 years old) non-obese (BMI ≤ 30) healthy participants were divided into four groups, insulin-sensitive active (ISA, 30.7%), insulin-sensitive sedentary (ISS, 21.4%), insulin-resistant active (IRA, 20%), and insulin-resistant sedentary (IRS, 23.3%), using the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and physical activity questionnaires. The effect of physical activity on 66 clinically relevant biochemical tests was compared among the four groups using linear models. (3) Results: Overall, non-obese IR participants had significantly (p ≤ 0.001) worse vital signs, blood sugar profiles, inflammatory markers, liver function, lipid profiles, and vitamin D levels than their IS counterparts. Physical activity was positively associated with left handgrip (p ≤ 0.01) and levels of creatine kinase (p ≤ 0.001) and creatine kinase-2 (p ≤ 0.001) in both IS and IR subjects. Furthermore, physical activity was positively associated with levels of creatinine (p ≤ 0.01) and total vitamin D (p = 0.006) in the IR group and AST (p = 0.001), folate (p = 0.001), and hematocrit (p = 0.007) in the IS group. Conversely, physical inactivity was negatively associated with the white blood cell count (p = 0.001) and an absolute number of lymphocytes (p = 0.003) in the IR subjects and with triglycerides (p = 0.005) and GGT-2 (p ≤ 0.001) in the IS counterparts. (4) Conclusions: An independent effect of moderate physical activity was observed in non-obese apparently healthy individuals a with different HOMA-IR index. The effect was marked by an improved health profile including higher vitamin D and lower inflammatory markers in IRA compared to IRS, and a higher oxygen carrying capacity and lipid profile in ISA compared to the ISS counterparts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95648772022-10-15 Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals AlMuraikhy, Shamma Anwardeen, Najeha Naeem, Aisha Sellami, Maha Domling, Alexander Agouni, Abdelali Elrayess, Mohamed A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article (1) Background: Young non-obese insulin-resistant (IR) individuals could be at risk of developing metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus. The protective effect of physical activity in this apparently healthy group is expected but not well characterized. In this study, clinically relevant metabolic profiles were determined and compared among active and sedentary insulin-sensitive (IS) and IR young non-obese individuals. (2) Methods: Data obtained from Qatar Biobank for 2110 young (20–30 years old) non-obese (BMI ≤ 30) healthy participants were divided into four groups, insulin-sensitive active (ISA, 30.7%), insulin-sensitive sedentary (ISS, 21.4%), insulin-resistant active (IRA, 20%), and insulin-resistant sedentary (IRS, 23.3%), using the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and physical activity questionnaires. The effect of physical activity on 66 clinically relevant biochemical tests was compared among the four groups using linear models. (3) Results: Overall, non-obese IR participants had significantly (p ≤ 0.001) worse vital signs, blood sugar profiles, inflammatory markers, liver function, lipid profiles, and vitamin D levels than their IS counterparts. Physical activity was positively associated with left handgrip (p ≤ 0.01) and levels of creatine kinase (p ≤ 0.001) and creatine kinase-2 (p ≤ 0.001) in both IS and IR subjects. Furthermore, physical activity was positively associated with levels of creatinine (p ≤ 0.01) and total vitamin D (p = 0.006) in the IR group and AST (p = 0.001), folate (p = 0.001), and hematocrit (p = 0.007) in the IS group. Conversely, physical inactivity was negatively associated with the white blood cell count (p = 0.001) and an absolute number of lymphocytes (p = 0.003) in the IR subjects and with triglycerides (p = 0.005) and GGT-2 (p ≤ 0.001) in the IS counterparts. (4) Conclusions: An independent effect of moderate physical activity was observed in non-obese apparently healthy individuals a with different HOMA-IR index. The effect was marked by an improved health profile including higher vitamin D and lower inflammatory markers in IRA compared to IRS, and a higher oxygen carrying capacity and lipid profile in ISA compared to the ISS counterparts. MDPI 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9564877/ /pubmed/36231474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912169 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
AlMuraikhy, Shamma
Anwardeen, Najeha
Naeem, Aisha
Sellami, Maha
Domling, Alexander
Agouni, Abdelali
Elrayess, Mohamed A.
Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals
title Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals
title_full Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals
title_fullStr Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals
title_short Comparing the Metabolic Profiles Associated with Fitness Status between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Non-Obese Individuals
title_sort comparing the metabolic profiles associated with fitness status between insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant non-obese individuals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912169
work_keys_str_mv AT almuraikhyshamma comparingthemetabolicprofilesassociatedwithfitnessstatusbetweeninsulinsensitiveandinsulinresistantnonobeseindividuals
AT anwardeennajeha comparingthemetabolicprofilesassociatedwithfitnessstatusbetweeninsulinsensitiveandinsulinresistantnonobeseindividuals
AT naeemaisha comparingthemetabolicprofilesassociatedwithfitnessstatusbetweeninsulinsensitiveandinsulinresistantnonobeseindividuals
AT sellamimaha comparingthemetabolicprofilesassociatedwithfitnessstatusbetweeninsulinsensitiveandinsulinresistantnonobeseindividuals
AT domlingalexander comparingthemetabolicprofilesassociatedwithfitnessstatusbetweeninsulinsensitiveandinsulinresistantnonobeseindividuals
AT agouniabdelali comparingthemetabolicprofilesassociatedwithfitnessstatusbetweeninsulinsensitiveandinsulinresistantnonobeseindividuals
AT elrayessmohameda comparingthemetabolicprofilesassociatedwithfitnessstatusbetweeninsulinsensitiveandinsulinresistantnonobeseindividuals