Cargando…
Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population
Although disaster research has acknowledged the role of social media in crisis communication, the interplay of new (e.g., mobile apps) and traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) in public warnings has received less attention, particularly from the recipients’ perspective. Therefore, we examined sociode...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912777 |
_version_ | 1784808762133970944 |
---|---|
author | Tomczyk, Samuel Rahn, Maxi Schmidt, Silke |
author_facet | Tomczyk, Samuel Rahn, Maxi Schmidt, Silke |
author_sort | Tomczyk, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although disaster research has acknowledged the role of social media in crisis communication, the interplay of new (e.g., mobile apps) and traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) in public warnings has received less attention, particularly from the recipients’ perspective. Therefore, we examined sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of different types of media use (i.e., traditional, new, mixed) for receiving public warning messages in a population survey (N = 613, 63% female; Mage = 31.56 years). More than two-thirds (68%) reported mixed media use, with 20% relying on new media and 12% on traditional media. Traditional media users were older and reported lower levels of education, while new media users were significantly younger and reported lower trust toward traditional media (i.e., TV). Migrants were more likely to use new but not mixed media. In sum, most participants utilized a mixture of traditional and new media for warning purposes, which has implications for crisis communication. Though, vulnerable populations (e.g., older and less educated participants) mainly rely on traditional media, stressing the need for continued support. Thus, it is paramount to increasingly use mixed methods designs and concurrently examine multiple channels to reflect real-world warning practices and generate ecologically valid results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9564902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95649022022-10-15 Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population Tomczyk, Samuel Rahn, Maxi Schmidt, Silke Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Although disaster research has acknowledged the role of social media in crisis communication, the interplay of new (e.g., mobile apps) and traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) in public warnings has received less attention, particularly from the recipients’ perspective. Therefore, we examined sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of different types of media use (i.e., traditional, new, mixed) for receiving public warning messages in a population survey (N = 613, 63% female; Mage = 31.56 years). More than two-thirds (68%) reported mixed media use, with 20% relying on new media and 12% on traditional media. Traditional media users were older and reported lower levels of education, while new media users were significantly younger and reported lower trust toward traditional media (i.e., TV). Migrants were more likely to use new but not mixed media. In sum, most participants utilized a mixture of traditional and new media for warning purposes, which has implications for crisis communication. Though, vulnerable populations (e.g., older and less educated participants) mainly rely on traditional media, stressing the need for continued support. Thus, it is paramount to increasingly use mixed methods designs and concurrently examine multiple channels to reflect real-world warning practices and generate ecologically valid results. MDPI 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9564902/ /pubmed/36232075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912777 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tomczyk, Samuel Rahn, Maxi Schmidt, Silke Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population |
title | Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population |
title_full | Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population |
title_fullStr | Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population |
title_short | Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population |
title_sort | sociodemographic and psychosocial profiles of multi-media use for risk communication in the general population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomczyksamuel sociodemographicandpsychosocialprofilesofmultimediauseforriskcommunicationinthegeneralpopulation AT rahnmaxi sociodemographicandpsychosocialprofilesofmultimediauseforriskcommunicationinthegeneralpopulation AT schmidtsilke sociodemographicandpsychosocialprofilesofmultimediauseforriskcommunicationinthegeneralpopulation |