Cargando…

Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population

Although disaster research has acknowledged the role of social media in crisis communication, the interplay of new (e.g., mobile apps) and traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) in public warnings has received less attention, particularly from the recipients’ perspective. Therefore, we examined sociode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomczyk, Samuel, Rahn, Maxi, Schmidt, Silke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912777
_version_ 1784808762133970944
author Tomczyk, Samuel
Rahn, Maxi
Schmidt, Silke
author_facet Tomczyk, Samuel
Rahn, Maxi
Schmidt, Silke
author_sort Tomczyk, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Although disaster research has acknowledged the role of social media in crisis communication, the interplay of new (e.g., mobile apps) and traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) in public warnings has received less attention, particularly from the recipients’ perspective. Therefore, we examined sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of different types of media use (i.e., traditional, new, mixed) for receiving public warning messages in a population survey (N = 613, 63% female; Mage = 31.56 years). More than two-thirds (68%) reported mixed media use, with 20% relying on new media and 12% on traditional media. Traditional media users were older and reported lower levels of education, while new media users were significantly younger and reported lower trust toward traditional media (i.e., TV). Migrants were more likely to use new but not mixed media. In sum, most participants utilized a mixture of traditional and new media for warning purposes, which has implications for crisis communication. Though, vulnerable populations (e.g., older and less educated participants) mainly rely on traditional media, stressing the need for continued support. Thus, it is paramount to increasingly use mixed methods designs and concurrently examine multiple channels to reflect real-world warning practices and generate ecologically valid results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9564902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95649022022-10-15 Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population Tomczyk, Samuel Rahn, Maxi Schmidt, Silke Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Although disaster research has acknowledged the role of social media in crisis communication, the interplay of new (e.g., mobile apps) and traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) in public warnings has received less attention, particularly from the recipients’ perspective. Therefore, we examined sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of different types of media use (i.e., traditional, new, mixed) for receiving public warning messages in a population survey (N = 613, 63% female; Mage = 31.56 years). More than two-thirds (68%) reported mixed media use, with 20% relying on new media and 12% on traditional media. Traditional media users were older and reported lower levels of education, while new media users were significantly younger and reported lower trust toward traditional media (i.e., TV). Migrants were more likely to use new but not mixed media. In sum, most participants utilized a mixture of traditional and new media for warning purposes, which has implications for crisis communication. Though, vulnerable populations (e.g., older and less educated participants) mainly rely on traditional media, stressing the need for continued support. Thus, it is paramount to increasingly use mixed methods designs and concurrently examine multiple channels to reflect real-world warning practices and generate ecologically valid results. MDPI 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9564902/ /pubmed/36232075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912777 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tomczyk, Samuel
Rahn, Maxi
Schmidt, Silke
Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population
title Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population
title_full Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population
title_fullStr Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population
title_full_unstemmed Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population
title_short Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population
title_sort sociodemographic and psychosocial profiles of multi-media use for risk communication in the general population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36232075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912777
work_keys_str_mv AT tomczyksamuel sociodemographicandpsychosocialprofilesofmultimediauseforriskcommunicationinthegeneralpopulation
AT rahnmaxi sociodemographicandpsychosocialprofilesofmultimediauseforriskcommunicationinthegeneralpopulation
AT schmidtsilke sociodemographicandpsychosocialprofilesofmultimediauseforriskcommunicationinthegeneralpopulation