Cargando…
Comparison of three-dimensional digital analyses and two-dimensional histomorphometric analyses of the bone-implant interface
Histological analysis is considered to be the gold standard method of evaluating osseointegration around a bone-implant. However, this method requires invasive specimen preparation and is capable of representing only one plane. By comparison, micro-computed tomography (μCT) is a fast and convenient...
Autores principales: | Hong, Jeong-Min, Kim, Ung-Gyu, Yeo, In-Sung Luke |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36240217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276269 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Fractal Dimension and Lacunarity Analyses for Predicting the Meningioma Grade
por: Kim, Soopil, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Bone healing dynamics associated with 3 implants with different surfaces: histologic and histomorphometric analyses in dogs
por: Lee, Jungwon, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Spiral scanning imaging and quantitative calculation of the 3-dimensional screw-shaped bone-implant interface on micro-computed tomography
por: Choi, Jung-Yoo Chesaria, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison between bone–implant interfaces of microtopographically modified zirconia and titanium implants
por: Thu, Myint Kyaw, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Three-dimensional scoring of zebrafish behavior unveils biological phenomena hidden by two-dimensional analyses
por: Macrì, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2017)