Cargando…

Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation

INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamic assessment is crucial after heart transplantation (HTX) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Gold-standard is invasive assessment via thermodilution (TD). Noninvasive pulse contour analysis (NPCA) is a new technology that is supposed to determine hemodynam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roth, Sebastian, Fox, Henrik, M’Pembele, René, Morshuis, Michiel, Lurati Buse, Giovanna, Hollmann, Markus W., Huhn, Ragnar, Bitter, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36240190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275977
_version_ 1784808876112084992
author Roth, Sebastian
Fox, Henrik
M’Pembele, René
Morshuis, Michiel
Lurati Buse, Giovanna
Hollmann, Markus W.
Huhn, Ragnar
Bitter, Thomas
author_facet Roth, Sebastian
Fox, Henrik
M’Pembele, René
Morshuis, Michiel
Lurati Buse, Giovanna
Hollmann, Markus W.
Huhn, Ragnar
Bitter, Thomas
author_sort Roth, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamic assessment is crucial after heart transplantation (HTX) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Gold-standard is invasive assessment via thermodilution (TD). Noninvasive pulse contour analysis (NPCA) is a new technology that is supposed to determine hemodynamics completely noninvasive. We aimed to validate this technology in HTX and LVAD patients and conducted a prospective single-center cohort study. METHODS: Patients after HTX or LVAD implantation underwent right heart catheterization including TD. NPCA using the CNAP Monitor (V.5.2.14; CNSystems Medizintechnik AG, Graz, Austria) was performed simultaneously. Three TD measurements were compared with simultaneous NPCA measurements for hemodynamic assessment. To describe the agreement between TD and NPCA, Bland–Altman analysis was done. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients were prospectively enrolled (HTX: n = 10, LVAD: n = 18). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of +1.05 l/min (limits of agreement ± 4.09 l/min, percentage error 62.1%) for cardiac output (CO). In LVAD patients, no adequate NPCA signal could be obtained. In 5 patients (27.8%), any NPCA signal could be detected, but was considered as low signal quality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, according to our limited data in a small cohort of HTX and LVAD patients, NPCA using the CNAP Monitor seems not to be suitable for noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9565384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95653842022-10-15 Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation Roth, Sebastian Fox, Henrik M’Pembele, René Morshuis, Michiel Lurati Buse, Giovanna Hollmann, Markus W. Huhn, Ragnar Bitter, Thomas PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamic assessment is crucial after heart transplantation (HTX) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Gold-standard is invasive assessment via thermodilution (TD). Noninvasive pulse contour analysis (NPCA) is a new technology that is supposed to determine hemodynamics completely noninvasive. We aimed to validate this technology in HTX and LVAD patients and conducted a prospective single-center cohort study. METHODS: Patients after HTX or LVAD implantation underwent right heart catheterization including TD. NPCA using the CNAP Monitor (V.5.2.14; CNSystems Medizintechnik AG, Graz, Austria) was performed simultaneously. Three TD measurements were compared with simultaneous NPCA measurements for hemodynamic assessment. To describe the agreement between TD and NPCA, Bland–Altman analysis was done. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients were prospectively enrolled (HTX: n = 10, LVAD: n = 18). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of +1.05 l/min (limits of agreement ± 4.09 l/min, percentage error 62.1%) for cardiac output (CO). In LVAD patients, no adequate NPCA signal could be obtained. In 5 patients (27.8%), any NPCA signal could be detected, but was considered as low signal quality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, according to our limited data in a small cohort of HTX and LVAD patients, NPCA using the CNAP Monitor seems not to be suitable for noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status. Public Library of Science 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9565384/ /pubmed/36240190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275977 Text en © 2022 Roth et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roth, Sebastian
Fox, Henrik
M’Pembele, René
Morshuis, Michiel
Lurati Buse, Giovanna
Hollmann, Markus W.
Huhn, Ragnar
Bitter, Thomas
Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
title Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
title_full Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
title_fullStr Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
title_short Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
title_sort noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36240190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275977
work_keys_str_mv AT rothsebastian noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT foxhenrik noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT mpembelerene noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT morshuismichiel noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT luratibusegiovanna noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT hollmannmarkusw noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT huhnragnar noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT bitterthomas noninvasiveevaluationofthehemodynamicstatusinpatientsafterhearttransplantationorleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation