Cargando…

Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review

There has been growing interest in integrating digital technologies in healthcare. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the economic value of pharmacist-led digital interventions. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases were searched to select studies that had conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Taehwan, Kim, Hyemin, Song, Seunghyun, Griggs, Scott K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911996
_version_ 1784808898197192704
author Park, Taehwan
Kim, Hyemin
Song, Seunghyun
Griggs, Scott K.
author_facet Park, Taehwan
Kim, Hyemin
Song, Seunghyun
Griggs, Scott K.
author_sort Park, Taehwan
collection PubMed
description There has been growing interest in integrating digital technologies in healthcare. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the economic value of pharmacist-led digital interventions. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases were searched to select studies that had conducted economic evaluations of digital interventions by pharmacists for the period from January 2001 to February 2022. Economic evidence from 14 selected studies was synthesized in our analysis. Pharmacists used telephones, computers, web-based interventions, videotapes, smartphones, and multiple technologies for their digital interventions. Prior studies have reported the results of telephone-based interventions to be cost-effective. Alternatively, these interventions were found to be cost-effective when reevaluated with recently cited willingness-to-pay thresholds. In addition, pharmacist-led interventions based on computers, web-based interventions, smartphones, and multiple technologies have been reported to be cost-effective in previous studies. However, videotape-based intervention was found cost-ineffective because there was no significant difference in outcomes between the intervention and the usual care groups. If this intervention had been intensive enough to improve outcomes in the intervention group, favorable cost-effectiveness results could have been obtained. The economic evidence in the previous studies represented short-term economic values. Economic evaluations of the long-term value of digital interventions are warranted in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9565470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95654702022-10-15 Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review Park, Taehwan Kim, Hyemin Song, Seunghyun Griggs, Scott K. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review There has been growing interest in integrating digital technologies in healthcare. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the economic value of pharmacist-led digital interventions. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases were searched to select studies that had conducted economic evaluations of digital interventions by pharmacists for the period from January 2001 to February 2022. Economic evidence from 14 selected studies was synthesized in our analysis. Pharmacists used telephones, computers, web-based interventions, videotapes, smartphones, and multiple technologies for their digital interventions. Prior studies have reported the results of telephone-based interventions to be cost-effective. Alternatively, these interventions were found to be cost-effective when reevaluated with recently cited willingness-to-pay thresholds. In addition, pharmacist-led interventions based on computers, web-based interventions, smartphones, and multiple technologies have been reported to be cost-effective in previous studies. However, videotape-based intervention was found cost-ineffective because there was no significant difference in outcomes between the intervention and the usual care groups. If this intervention had been intensive enough to improve outcomes in the intervention group, favorable cost-effectiveness results could have been obtained. The economic evidence in the previous studies represented short-term economic values. Economic evaluations of the long-term value of digital interventions are warranted in future studies. MDPI 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9565470/ /pubmed/36231307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911996 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Park, Taehwan
Kim, Hyemin
Song, Seunghyun
Griggs, Scott K.
Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review
title Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_full Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_short Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_sort economic evaluation of pharmacist-led digital health interventions: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911996
work_keys_str_mv AT parktaehwan economicevaluationofpharmacistleddigitalhealthinterventionsasystematicreview
AT kimhyemin economicevaluationofpharmacistleddigitalhealthinterventionsasystematicreview
AT songseunghyun economicevaluationofpharmacistleddigitalhealthinterventionsasystematicreview
AT griggsscottk economicevaluationofpharmacistleddigitalhealthinterventionsasystematicreview