Cargando…
How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed
Topographic position indices (TPIs) measure essential impacts on ecosystem service supply capacity. The identification of changes in ecosystem services and value metrics under varying TPIs has become a topical subject of global change research. Multidimensional changes in spatiotemporal and geograph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911958 |
_version_ | 1784808931617406976 |
---|---|
author | Li, Li Li, Yonghui Yang, Lan Liang, Ying Zhao, Wenliang Chen, Guanyu |
author_facet | Li, Li Li, Yonghui Yang, Lan Liang, Ying Zhao, Wenliang Chen, Guanyu |
author_sort | Li, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | Topographic position indices (TPIs) measure essential impacts on ecosystem service supply capacity. The identification of changes in ecosystem services and value metrics under varying TPIs has become a topical subject of global change research. Multidimensional changes in spatiotemporal and geographical aspects of ecosystem service values (ESVs) are assessed in this article using land cover/use data from 2000–2015. Effects of land-use/cover changes and topographic indices on ESVs are explored using the Chinese terrestrial unit area ecosystem service value equivalence table combined with topographic factors. A sensitivity index is introduced to quantify the robustness of total ESV to land-use/cover and topographic indices. The results show that: (1) The total ESV in the Qihe watershed declined with a change in land-use/cover during the period 2000–2015. The maximum ESV was CNY 1.984 billion in 2005 and the minimum was CNY 1.940 billion in 2010; (2) The response of ESV to land/use cover varied greatly across TPIs, with the most significant change in ESV occurring in the 0.6–0.8 TPI range and the greatest change in a single ecosystem service occurred in water areas; (3) The sensitivity indices of ESVs are all less than 1. The sensitivity indices of unused land and water tended to zero. Woodland sensitivity indices were the highest at 0.53, followed by those of arable land and grassland, owing to the large proportion of arable land and grassland areas in the overall area of land-use categories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9565604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95656042022-10-15 How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed Li, Li Li, Yonghui Yang, Lan Liang, Ying Zhao, Wenliang Chen, Guanyu Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Topographic position indices (TPIs) measure essential impacts on ecosystem service supply capacity. The identification of changes in ecosystem services and value metrics under varying TPIs has become a topical subject of global change research. Multidimensional changes in spatiotemporal and geographical aspects of ecosystem service values (ESVs) are assessed in this article using land cover/use data from 2000–2015. Effects of land-use/cover changes and topographic indices on ESVs are explored using the Chinese terrestrial unit area ecosystem service value equivalence table combined with topographic factors. A sensitivity index is introduced to quantify the robustness of total ESV to land-use/cover and topographic indices. The results show that: (1) The total ESV in the Qihe watershed declined with a change in land-use/cover during the period 2000–2015. The maximum ESV was CNY 1.984 billion in 2005 and the minimum was CNY 1.940 billion in 2010; (2) The response of ESV to land/use cover varied greatly across TPIs, with the most significant change in ESV occurring in the 0.6–0.8 TPI range and the greatest change in a single ecosystem service occurred in water areas; (3) The sensitivity indices of ESVs are all less than 1. The sensitivity indices of unused land and water tended to zero. Woodland sensitivity indices were the highest at 0.53, followed by those of arable land and grassland, owing to the large proportion of arable land and grassland areas in the overall area of land-use categories. MDPI 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9565604/ /pubmed/36231260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911958 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Li Li, Yonghui Yang, Lan Liang, Ying Zhao, Wenliang Chen, Guanyu How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed |
title | How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed |
title_full | How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed |
title_fullStr | How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed |
title_full_unstemmed | How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed |
title_short | How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed |
title_sort | how does topography affect the value of ecosystem services? an empirical study from the qihe watershed |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lili howdoestopographyaffectthevalueofecosystemservicesanempiricalstudyfromtheqihewatershed AT liyonghui howdoestopographyaffectthevalueofecosystemservicesanempiricalstudyfromtheqihewatershed AT yanglan howdoestopographyaffectthevalueofecosystemservicesanempiricalstudyfromtheqihewatershed AT liangying howdoestopographyaffectthevalueofecosystemservicesanempiricalstudyfromtheqihewatershed AT zhaowenliang howdoestopographyaffectthevalueofecosystemservicesanempiricalstudyfromtheqihewatershed AT chenguanyu howdoestopographyaffectthevalueofecosystemservicesanempiricalstudyfromtheqihewatershed |