Cargando…

Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections

In some situations, e.g., when filling out lottery tickets, it can be advantageous to select random locations. However, people usually have difficulties with this, because they are biased by preferences for certain regions, such as the center of an area. According to ideas from art theory, the prefe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hübner, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36240249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276207
_version_ 1784808947638599680
author Hübner, Ronald
author_facet Hübner, Ronald
author_sort Hübner, Ronald
collection PubMed
description In some situations, e.g., when filling out lottery tickets, it can be advantageous to select random locations. However, people usually have difficulties with this, because they are biased by preferences for certain regions, such as the center of an area. According to ideas from art theory, the preferred regions reflect the hidden structure of perceptual forces within an area. In the present study, these structures were investigated and modeled under different conditions for areas with square and rectangular shape. The general task was to sequentially place a number of dots at random locations in an area by clicking with the computer mouse at corresponding positions on the screen. Whereas in a single-dot condition each dot had to be placed in an empty area, the previously placed dots remained visible in a multiple-dots condition. In three experiments it was found that dots were preferentially placed at the center, the diagonals, and the principal axes. This preference was more pronounced in the single than in the multiple-dot condition. Moreover, sequential analyses revealed that dot placing was not only planned in advance, but that the participants also agreed to some extent in their sequential selections, which produced surprisingly similar sequential spatial patterns across participants, at least for the first dots. Altogether, the results indicate that people have great difficulties with the random selection of locations. Their selections are strongly affected by the attraction of specific regions, by previous selections, and by sequential habits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9565670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95656702022-10-15 Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections Hübner, Ronald PLoS One Research Article In some situations, e.g., when filling out lottery tickets, it can be advantageous to select random locations. However, people usually have difficulties with this, because they are biased by preferences for certain regions, such as the center of an area. According to ideas from art theory, the preferred regions reflect the hidden structure of perceptual forces within an area. In the present study, these structures were investigated and modeled under different conditions for areas with square and rectangular shape. The general task was to sequentially place a number of dots at random locations in an area by clicking with the computer mouse at corresponding positions on the screen. Whereas in a single-dot condition each dot had to be placed in an empty area, the previously placed dots remained visible in a multiple-dots condition. In three experiments it was found that dots were preferentially placed at the center, the diagonals, and the principal axes. This preference was more pronounced in the single than in the multiple-dot condition. Moreover, sequential analyses revealed that dot placing was not only planned in advance, but that the participants also agreed to some extent in their sequential selections, which produced surprisingly similar sequential spatial patterns across participants, at least for the first dots. Altogether, the results indicate that people have great difficulties with the random selection of locations. Their selections are strongly affected by the attraction of specific regions, by previous selections, and by sequential habits. Public Library of Science 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9565670/ /pubmed/36240249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276207 Text en © 2022 Ronald Hübner https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hübner, Ronald
Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
title Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
title_full Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
title_fullStr Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
title_full_unstemmed Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
title_short Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
title_sort position biases in sequential location selection: effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36240249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276207
work_keys_str_mv AT hubnerronald positionbiasesinsequentiallocationselectioneffectsofregionchoicehistoryandvisibilityofpreviousselections