Cargando…
Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections
In some situations, e.g., when filling out lottery tickets, it can be advantageous to select random locations. However, people usually have difficulties with this, because they are biased by preferences for certain regions, such as the center of an area. According to ideas from art theory, the prefe...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36240249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276207 |
_version_ | 1784808947638599680 |
---|---|
author | Hübner, Ronald |
author_facet | Hübner, Ronald |
author_sort | Hübner, Ronald |
collection | PubMed |
description | In some situations, e.g., when filling out lottery tickets, it can be advantageous to select random locations. However, people usually have difficulties with this, because they are biased by preferences for certain regions, such as the center of an area. According to ideas from art theory, the preferred regions reflect the hidden structure of perceptual forces within an area. In the present study, these structures were investigated and modeled under different conditions for areas with square and rectangular shape. The general task was to sequentially place a number of dots at random locations in an area by clicking with the computer mouse at corresponding positions on the screen. Whereas in a single-dot condition each dot had to be placed in an empty area, the previously placed dots remained visible in a multiple-dots condition. In three experiments it was found that dots were preferentially placed at the center, the diagonals, and the principal axes. This preference was more pronounced in the single than in the multiple-dot condition. Moreover, sequential analyses revealed that dot placing was not only planned in advance, but that the participants also agreed to some extent in their sequential selections, which produced surprisingly similar sequential spatial patterns across participants, at least for the first dots. Altogether, the results indicate that people have great difficulties with the random selection of locations. Their selections are strongly affected by the attraction of specific regions, by previous selections, and by sequential habits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9565670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95656702022-10-15 Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections Hübner, Ronald PLoS One Research Article In some situations, e.g., when filling out lottery tickets, it can be advantageous to select random locations. However, people usually have difficulties with this, because they are biased by preferences for certain regions, such as the center of an area. According to ideas from art theory, the preferred regions reflect the hidden structure of perceptual forces within an area. In the present study, these structures were investigated and modeled under different conditions for areas with square and rectangular shape. The general task was to sequentially place a number of dots at random locations in an area by clicking with the computer mouse at corresponding positions on the screen. Whereas in a single-dot condition each dot had to be placed in an empty area, the previously placed dots remained visible in a multiple-dots condition. In three experiments it was found that dots were preferentially placed at the center, the diagonals, and the principal axes. This preference was more pronounced in the single than in the multiple-dot condition. Moreover, sequential analyses revealed that dot placing was not only planned in advance, but that the participants also agreed to some extent in their sequential selections, which produced surprisingly similar sequential spatial patterns across participants, at least for the first dots. Altogether, the results indicate that people have great difficulties with the random selection of locations. Their selections are strongly affected by the attraction of specific regions, by previous selections, and by sequential habits. Public Library of Science 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9565670/ /pubmed/36240249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276207 Text en © 2022 Ronald Hübner https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hübner, Ronald Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections |
title | Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections |
title_full | Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections |
title_fullStr | Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections |
title_full_unstemmed | Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections |
title_short | Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections |
title_sort | position biases in sequential location selection: effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36240249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hubnerronald positionbiasesinsequentiallocationselectioneffectsofregionchoicehistoryandvisibilityofpreviousselections |