Cargando…
“Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance
“Ghosts” are fibrinous remnants that become visible during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: Data from transoesophageal echocardiography-guided TLE procedures performed in 1103 patients were analysed to identify predisposing risk factors for the development of so-called disappearing ghosts...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912542 |
_version_ | 1784809026901508096 |
---|---|
author | Nowosielecka, Dorota Jacheć, Wojciech Polewczyk, Anna Tułecki, Łukasz Stefańczyk, Paweł Kutarski, Andrzej |
author_facet | Nowosielecka, Dorota Jacheć, Wojciech Polewczyk, Anna Tułecki, Łukasz Stefańczyk, Paweł Kutarski, Andrzej |
author_sort | Nowosielecka, Dorota |
collection | PubMed |
description | “Ghosts” are fibrinous remnants that become visible during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: Data from transoesophageal echocardiography-guided TLE procedures performed in 1103 patients were analysed to identify predisposing risk factors for the development of so-called disappearing ghosts—flying ghosts (FG), or attached to the cardiovascular wall—stable ghosts (SG), and to find out whether the presence of ghosts affected patient prognosis after TLE. Results: Ghosts were detected in 44.67% of patients (FG 15.5%, SG 29.2%). The occurrence of ghosts was associated with patient age at first system implantation [FG (OR = 0.984; p = 0.019), SG (OR = 0.989; p = 0.030)], scar tissue around the lead (s) [FG (OR = 7.106; p < 0.001, OR = 1.372; p = 0.011), SG (OR = 1.940; p < 0.001)], adherence of the lead to the cardiovascular wall [FG (OR = 0.517; p = 0.034)] and the number of leads [SG (OR = 1.450; p < 0.002). The presence of ghosts had no impact on long-term survival after TLE in the whole study group [FG HR = 0.927, 95% CI (0.742–1.159); p = 0.505; SG HR = 0.845, 95% CI (0.638–1.132); p = 0.265]. Conclusions: The degree of growth and maturation of scar tissue surrounding the lead was the strongest factor leading to the development of both types of ghosts. The presence of either form of ghost did not affect long-term survival even after TLE indicated for infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9565986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95659862022-10-15 “Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance Nowosielecka, Dorota Jacheć, Wojciech Polewczyk, Anna Tułecki, Łukasz Stefańczyk, Paweł Kutarski, Andrzej Int J Environ Res Public Health Article “Ghosts” are fibrinous remnants that become visible during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: Data from transoesophageal echocardiography-guided TLE procedures performed in 1103 patients were analysed to identify predisposing risk factors for the development of so-called disappearing ghosts—flying ghosts (FG), or attached to the cardiovascular wall—stable ghosts (SG), and to find out whether the presence of ghosts affected patient prognosis after TLE. Results: Ghosts were detected in 44.67% of patients (FG 15.5%, SG 29.2%). The occurrence of ghosts was associated with patient age at first system implantation [FG (OR = 0.984; p = 0.019), SG (OR = 0.989; p = 0.030)], scar tissue around the lead (s) [FG (OR = 7.106; p < 0.001, OR = 1.372; p = 0.011), SG (OR = 1.940; p < 0.001)], adherence of the lead to the cardiovascular wall [FG (OR = 0.517; p = 0.034)] and the number of leads [SG (OR = 1.450; p < 0.002). The presence of ghosts had no impact on long-term survival after TLE in the whole study group [FG HR = 0.927, 95% CI (0.742–1.159); p = 0.505; SG HR = 0.845, 95% CI (0.638–1.132); p = 0.265]. Conclusions: The degree of growth and maturation of scar tissue surrounding the lead was the strongest factor leading to the development of both types of ghosts. The presence of either form of ghost did not affect long-term survival even after TLE indicated for infection. MDPI 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9565986/ /pubmed/36231841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912542 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nowosielecka, Dorota Jacheć, Wojciech Polewczyk, Anna Tułecki, Łukasz Stefańczyk, Paweł Kutarski, Andrzej “Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance |
title | “Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance |
title_full | “Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance |
title_fullStr | “Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance |
title_full_unstemmed | “Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance |
title_short | “Ghost”, a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance |
title_sort | “ghost”, a well-known but not fully explained echocardiographic finding during transvenous lead extraction: clinical significance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nowosieleckadorota ghostawellknownbutnotfullyexplainedechocardiographicfindingduringtransvenousleadextractionclinicalsignificance AT jachecwojciech ghostawellknownbutnotfullyexplainedechocardiographicfindingduringtransvenousleadextractionclinicalsignificance AT polewczykanna ghostawellknownbutnotfullyexplainedechocardiographicfindingduringtransvenousleadextractionclinicalsignificance AT tułeckiłukasz ghostawellknownbutnotfullyexplainedechocardiographicfindingduringtransvenousleadextractionclinicalsignificance AT stefanczykpaweł ghostawellknownbutnotfullyexplainedechocardiographicfindingduringtransvenousleadextractionclinicalsignificance AT kutarskiandrzej ghostawellknownbutnotfullyexplainedechocardiographicfindingduringtransvenousleadextractionclinicalsignificance |