Cargando…

Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review

Background: Small cigarette pack sizes contain less than 20 cigarette sticks in a pack. Smaller packs may suggest lower costs, increasing affordability among lower-income users, especially the younger generation, which could lead to tobacco-related diseases and economic costs, including human capita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mat Rifin, Halizah, Jane Ling, Miaw Yn, Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle, Saminathan, Thamil Arasu, Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira, Ab Majid, Nur Liana, Hamid, Hamizatul Akmal Abd, Riyadzi, Mohd Ruhaizie, Ahmad, Ahzairin, Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli, Muhamad, Nor Asiah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9566128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912051
_version_ 1784809065592913920
author Mat Rifin, Halizah
Jane Ling, Miaw Yn
Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle
Saminathan, Thamil Arasu
Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira
Ab Majid, Nur Liana
Hamid, Hamizatul Akmal Abd
Riyadzi, Mohd Ruhaizie
Ahmad, Ahzairin
Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli
Muhamad, Nor Asiah
author_facet Mat Rifin, Halizah
Jane Ling, Miaw Yn
Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle
Saminathan, Thamil Arasu
Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira
Ab Majid, Nur Liana
Hamid, Hamizatul Akmal Abd
Riyadzi, Mohd Ruhaizie
Ahmad, Ahzairin
Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli
Muhamad, Nor Asiah
author_sort Mat Rifin, Halizah
collection PubMed
description Background: Small cigarette pack sizes contain less than 20 cigarette sticks in a pack. Smaller packs may suggest lower costs, increasing affordability among lower-income users, especially the younger generation, which could lead to tobacco-related diseases and economic costs, including human capital lost results from tobacco-attributable morbidity and mortality. This concern has caused many countries to ban the sale of single cigarette sticks or kiddie packs. However, small cigarette pack sizes were proposed recently to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. This would demean efforts in combating tobacco consumption based on the existing tobacco control policies to prevent minors from purchasing cigarettes. Given the competing influences of affordability and availability of tobacco on consumption and the dearth of evidence-based review on the impact of pack size on smoking, this systematic review was conducted to identify the link between kiddie packs and smoking specifically on the initiation of smoking, urge/tendency to buy cigarettes among the general population and attempt to reduce cigarette consumption and prevalence of smoking using kiddie packs among current smokers. Methods: We include all studies except for reviews, guidelines, conference papers, commentaries, editorials, or opinion pieces. A database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus on 27 November 2021. The results were presented in the form of narrative synthesis under four groups: initiation of smoking; urge/tendency to buy cigarettes; the prevalence of smoking, and attempt to reduce cigarette consumption. The literature search identified 1601 articles, of which 21 articles had met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of all included articles was determined using a validated 16-item quality assessment tool (QATSDD). The average quality score for all papers was 34.8%. Discussion: Given the diverse study settings of the articles and despite the challenges of the methodological quality of some articles, this review provides some evidence that kiddie packs may increase the urge/tendency to buy cigarettes and mixed evidence on the attempt to reduce cigarette consumption. This review also found some evidence that kiddie pack purchasing among teenage smokers was higher compared to adults. However, we are uncertain about the link between kiddie packs and smoking initiation. Nevertheless, since most studies were of low quality, further high-quality studies are needed to conclude about the impact of kiddie packs on smoking to assist the policymakers and stakeholders in formulating new policies and strengthening existing strategies related to the kiddie packs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9566128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95661282022-10-15 Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review Mat Rifin, Halizah Jane Ling, Miaw Yn Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle Saminathan, Thamil Arasu Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Ab Majid, Nur Liana Hamid, Hamizatul Akmal Abd Riyadzi, Mohd Ruhaizie Ahmad, Ahzairin Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli Muhamad, Nor Asiah Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Small cigarette pack sizes contain less than 20 cigarette sticks in a pack. Smaller packs may suggest lower costs, increasing affordability among lower-income users, especially the younger generation, which could lead to tobacco-related diseases and economic costs, including human capital lost results from tobacco-attributable morbidity and mortality. This concern has caused many countries to ban the sale of single cigarette sticks or kiddie packs. However, small cigarette pack sizes were proposed recently to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. This would demean efforts in combating tobacco consumption based on the existing tobacco control policies to prevent minors from purchasing cigarettes. Given the competing influences of affordability and availability of tobacco on consumption and the dearth of evidence-based review on the impact of pack size on smoking, this systematic review was conducted to identify the link between kiddie packs and smoking specifically on the initiation of smoking, urge/tendency to buy cigarettes among the general population and attempt to reduce cigarette consumption and prevalence of smoking using kiddie packs among current smokers. Methods: We include all studies except for reviews, guidelines, conference papers, commentaries, editorials, or opinion pieces. A database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus on 27 November 2021. The results were presented in the form of narrative synthesis under four groups: initiation of smoking; urge/tendency to buy cigarettes; the prevalence of smoking, and attempt to reduce cigarette consumption. The literature search identified 1601 articles, of which 21 articles had met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of all included articles was determined using a validated 16-item quality assessment tool (QATSDD). The average quality score for all papers was 34.8%. Discussion: Given the diverse study settings of the articles and despite the challenges of the methodological quality of some articles, this review provides some evidence that kiddie packs may increase the urge/tendency to buy cigarettes and mixed evidence on the attempt to reduce cigarette consumption. This review also found some evidence that kiddie pack purchasing among teenage smokers was higher compared to adults. However, we are uncertain about the link between kiddie packs and smoking initiation. Nevertheless, since most studies were of low quality, further high-quality studies are needed to conclude about the impact of kiddie packs on smoking to assist the policymakers and stakeholders in formulating new policies and strengthening existing strategies related to the kiddie packs. MDPI 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9566128/ /pubmed/36231349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912051 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mat Rifin, Halizah
Jane Ling, Miaw Yn
Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle
Saminathan, Thamil Arasu
Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira
Ab Majid, Nur Liana
Hamid, Hamizatul Akmal Abd
Riyadzi, Mohd Ruhaizie
Ahmad, Ahzairin
Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli
Muhamad, Nor Asiah
Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review
title Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review
title_full Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review
title_short Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review
title_sort small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9566128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912051
work_keys_str_mv AT matrifinhalizah smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT janelingmiawyn smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT robertlourdestaniagayle smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT saminathanthamilarasu smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT rodzlanhasaniwanshakira smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT abmajidnurliana smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT hamidhamizatulakmalabd smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT riyadzimohdruhaizie smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT ahmadahzairin smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT mohdyusoffmuhammadfadhli smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview
AT muhamadnorasiah smallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmokingasystematicreview