Cargando…

“Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons”

The approach of a multi-professional team in the treatment of acute psychosis was started in 2018/2019 In Latvia, within the framework of the early intervention program. Until then, the patient was mostly examined and treated with medication in the inpatient phase of acute psychosis. After discharge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jaudzema, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9566309/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.189
_version_ 1784809119700484096
author Jaudzema, J.
author_facet Jaudzema, J.
author_sort Jaudzema, J.
collection PubMed
description The approach of a multi-professional team in the treatment of acute psychosis was started in 2018/2019 In Latvia, within the framework of the early intervention program. Until then, the patient was mostly examined and treated with medication in the inpatient phase of acute psychosis. After discharge, further treatment and rehabilitation in Latvia is still relatively limited and largely based on the initiative of the patient and relatives. Within the multi-professional team of the inpatient department of the Riga Psychiatry and Narcology Center, a psychiatrist, mental health nurses, nursing assistants, psychologists, occupational therapists, a physiotherapist, a visual arts and dance - movement therapist, as well as a social worker work together. The benefits of teamwork in the treatment of acute psychosis are undeniable, but during these few years, working in challenging conditions, various disadvantages have crystallized. Among the ’pros’ is a more successful, multifaceted outcome of recovery, better patient compliance and reduction of stigma among patients and their relatives (and thus in society as a whole). ’Cons’ are mainly due to limited availability of resources, from limited funding and infrastructure to a lack of professionals and time. It should also be noted that mental health literacy is still low in Latvian society, which means that patients often arrive late for help, which means that it is not possible to achieve good results in a limited time within the hospital. For these reasons, treatment is often discontinued after discharge, which increases the risk of rehospitalisation and adverse course of the disease. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9566309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95663092022-10-17 “Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons” Jaudzema, J. Eur Psychiatry Abstract The approach of a multi-professional team in the treatment of acute psychosis was started in 2018/2019 In Latvia, within the framework of the early intervention program. Until then, the patient was mostly examined and treated with medication in the inpatient phase of acute psychosis. After discharge, further treatment and rehabilitation in Latvia is still relatively limited and largely based on the initiative of the patient and relatives. Within the multi-professional team of the inpatient department of the Riga Psychiatry and Narcology Center, a psychiatrist, mental health nurses, nursing assistants, psychologists, occupational therapists, a physiotherapist, a visual arts and dance - movement therapist, as well as a social worker work together. The benefits of teamwork in the treatment of acute psychosis are undeniable, but during these few years, working in challenging conditions, various disadvantages have crystallized. Among the ’pros’ is a more successful, multifaceted outcome of recovery, better patient compliance and reduction of stigma among patients and their relatives (and thus in society as a whole). ’Cons’ are mainly due to limited availability of resources, from limited funding and infrastructure to a lack of professionals and time. It should also be noted that mental health literacy is still low in Latvian society, which means that patients often arrive late for help, which means that it is not possible to achieve good results in a limited time within the hospital. For these reasons, treatment is often discontinued after discharge, which increases the risk of rehospitalisation and adverse course of the disease. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9566309/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.189 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Jaudzema, J.
“Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons”
title “Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons”
title_full “Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons”
title_fullStr “Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons”
title_full_unstemmed “Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons”
title_short “Contemporary Treatment in Multi-Professional Team of Acute Psychosis- Pros and Cons”
title_sort “contemporary treatment in multi-professional team of acute psychosis- pros and cons”
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9566309/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.189
work_keys_str_mv AT jaudzemaj contemporarytreatmentinmultiprofessionalteamofacutepsychosisprosandcons