Cargando…

Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities

INTRODUCTION: Desperation for cure led to 19(th) century invention-- electrotherapeutic devices; replete with hyperbolic claims of cure-all, perceived ineffectiveness, and potential harm rendered the modality as quackery but were used in early brain stimulation, melancholia treatment, and cortex map...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, D., Carr, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9566499/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.672
_version_ 1784809165977288704
author Cox, D.
Carr, B.
author_facet Cox, D.
Carr, B.
author_sort Cox, D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Desperation for cure led to 19(th) century invention-- electrotherapeutic devices; replete with hyperbolic claims of cure-all, perceived ineffectiveness, and potential harm rendered the modality as quackery but were used in early brain stimulation, melancholia treatment, and cortex mapping. Here, antique devices are restored, and their electrophysiological qualities ascertained. OBJECTIVES: Determine the comparative capabilities of these devices in delivering electrostimulation and compare with modern standards to understand possible electrophysiological sequelae. METHODS: Devices known as “medical batteries” were analyzed. Power delivery utilized a “voltaic battery”, simple circuit, and a conductor wrapped around an iron core. When the circuit is energized, the core is magnetized by direct current of the battery which induces an alternating current that electrifies probes used on the body. Due to their marked age, a common 9-volt battery was exchanged for the corrosive dry cell paste batteries. Electrical parameters were then measured. RESULTS: [Table: see text] CONCLUSIONS: Devices for electrotherapeutics ranged from anemic vibrations to dangerous tetany inducing shocks. Measuring the capabilities of these devices shows the robust yields possible if the original higher capacity batteries were utilized. The reality is, cure or not, the devices were surprisingly potent. It is interesting that, albeit unrefined, efficacious doses were available before modern electrification. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9566499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95664992022-10-17 Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities Cox, D. Carr, B. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Desperation for cure led to 19(th) century invention-- electrotherapeutic devices; replete with hyperbolic claims of cure-all, perceived ineffectiveness, and potential harm rendered the modality as quackery but were used in early brain stimulation, melancholia treatment, and cortex mapping. Here, antique devices are restored, and their electrophysiological qualities ascertained. OBJECTIVES: Determine the comparative capabilities of these devices in delivering electrostimulation and compare with modern standards to understand possible electrophysiological sequelae. METHODS: Devices known as “medical batteries” were analyzed. Power delivery utilized a “voltaic battery”, simple circuit, and a conductor wrapped around an iron core. When the circuit is energized, the core is magnetized by direct current of the battery which induces an alternating current that electrifies probes used on the body. Due to their marked age, a common 9-volt battery was exchanged for the corrosive dry cell paste batteries. Electrical parameters were then measured. RESULTS: [Table: see text] CONCLUSIONS: Devices for electrotherapeutics ranged from anemic vibrations to dangerous tetany inducing shocks. Measuring the capabilities of these devices shows the robust yields possible if the original higher capacity batteries were utilized. The reality is, cure or not, the devices were surprisingly potent. It is interesting that, albeit unrefined, efficacious doses were available before modern electrification. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9566499/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.672 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Cox, D.
Carr, B.
Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities
title Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities
title_full Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities
title_fullStr Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities
title_full_unstemmed Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities
title_short Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities
title_sort late 1800s fringe electrotherapeutic devices: comparative electrical capabilities
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9566499/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.672
work_keys_str_mv AT coxd late1800sfringeelectrotherapeuticdevicescomparativeelectricalcapabilities
AT carrb late1800sfringeelectrotherapeuticdevicescomparativeelectricalcapabilities