Cargando…

Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting

INTRODUCTION: The use of “operational criteria” in DSM-III was proposed as a solution to low reliability among psychiatrist’s diagnosis. It is considered a turning point in the psychiatric classification and diagnostic process, furtherly adopted in ICD. However, the utility of using such criteria in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocha Neto, H.G.D., Cavalcanti, M., Telles Correia, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567059/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.434
_version_ 1784809306536804352
author Rocha Neto, H.G.D.
Cavalcanti, M.
Telles Correia, D.
author_facet Rocha Neto, H.G.D.
Cavalcanti, M.
Telles Correia, D.
author_sort Rocha Neto, H.G.D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of “operational criteria” in DSM-III was proposed as a solution to low reliability among psychiatrist’s diagnosis. It is considered a turning point in the psychiatric classification and diagnostic process, furtherly adopted in ICD. However, the utility of using such criteria in everyday clinical practice is still not clear. OBJECTIVES: To measure agreement between prototypical and ICD-10 categorical diagnosis. METHODS: In IPUB’s outpatient clinics, psychiatry residents work in a real-life clinical scenario, attending patients from Rio de Janeiro/RJ-Brazil. Although regularly trained in ICD criteria, it is not usual to check every criterion in their daily practice. Thus, patients are diagnosed with a prototype-based disorder, not necessarily strictly attached to ICD criteria. We propose a cross-sectional study, where psychiatry residents check their clinical diagnosis according to ICD criteria and compare its agreement with kappa statistics. RESULTS: Three of thirty residents joined the study, providing diagnosis for 146 patients under their care. Forty-five diagnoses were obtained before and 51 after ICD-10 criterion application. Diagnoses were grouped under 8 groups (Organic, Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Bipolar Affective Disorder, Depression, Anxiety-Related Disorders, Personality Disorders, Neurodevelopmental Disorders), and kappa agreement obtained using ICD-10 diagnosis as the gold standard against prototypical diagnoses. Overall kappa was 0.77 (IC - 0.69 - 0.85), ranging from 0.58 (Personality Disorders) to 0.91 (Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder). These findings also were reflected as high sensibility, specificity, Positive Predictive, and Negative Predictive values in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prototypical diagnostic elaboration, while probably based on previously learned, but not applied operational criteria, was equivalent to diagnostic obtained through ICD-10 categories. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9567059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95670592022-10-17 Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting Rocha Neto, H.G.D. Cavalcanti, M. Telles Correia, D. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: The use of “operational criteria” in DSM-III was proposed as a solution to low reliability among psychiatrist’s diagnosis. It is considered a turning point in the psychiatric classification and diagnostic process, furtherly adopted in ICD. However, the utility of using such criteria in everyday clinical practice is still not clear. OBJECTIVES: To measure agreement between prototypical and ICD-10 categorical diagnosis. METHODS: In IPUB’s outpatient clinics, psychiatry residents work in a real-life clinical scenario, attending patients from Rio de Janeiro/RJ-Brazil. Although regularly trained in ICD criteria, it is not usual to check every criterion in their daily practice. Thus, patients are diagnosed with a prototype-based disorder, not necessarily strictly attached to ICD criteria. We propose a cross-sectional study, where psychiatry residents check their clinical diagnosis according to ICD criteria and compare its agreement with kappa statistics. RESULTS: Three of thirty residents joined the study, providing diagnosis for 146 patients under their care. Forty-five diagnoses were obtained before and 51 after ICD-10 criterion application. Diagnoses were grouped under 8 groups (Organic, Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Bipolar Affective Disorder, Depression, Anxiety-Related Disorders, Personality Disorders, Neurodevelopmental Disorders), and kappa agreement obtained using ICD-10 diagnosis as the gold standard against prototypical diagnoses. Overall kappa was 0.77 (IC - 0.69 - 0.85), ranging from 0.58 (Personality Disorders) to 0.91 (Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder). These findings also were reflected as high sensibility, specificity, Positive Predictive, and Negative Predictive values in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prototypical diagnostic elaboration, while probably based on previously learned, but not applied operational criteria, was equivalent to diagnostic obtained through ICD-10 categories. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9567059/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.434 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Rocha Neto, H.G.D.
Cavalcanti, M.
Telles Correia, D.
Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
title Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
title_full Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
title_fullStr Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
title_full_unstemmed Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
title_short Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
title_sort kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and icd-10 criteria for mental disorders: a cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567059/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.434
work_keys_str_mv AT rochanetohgd kappaaccuracyofprototypicaldiagnosisandicd10criteriaformentaldisordersacrosssectionalstudyinareallifesetting
AT cavalcantim kappaaccuracyofprototypicaldiagnosisandicd10criteriaformentaldisordersacrosssectionalstudyinareallifesetting
AT tellescorreiad kappaaccuracyofprototypicaldiagnosisandicd10criteriaformentaldisordersacrosssectionalstudyinareallifesetting