Cargando…
ESKALE study, a French real-world study of esketamine nasal spray for patients with treatment-resistant depression
INTRODUCTION: Esketamine nasal spray has been developed to treat adults with treatment resistant depression. On Dec.2019, EMA granted a market access approval in this indication. OBJECTIVES: ESKALE is a descriptive study of treatment resistant depression patients treated with esketamine in France. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567231/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.693 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Esketamine nasal spray has been developed to treat adults with treatment resistant depression. On Dec.2019, EMA granted a market access approval in this indication. OBJECTIVES: ESKALE is a descriptive study of treatment resistant depression patients treated with esketamine in France. METHODS: Observational retrospective study. 157 patients are included in 3 cohorts depending on their treatment initiation date. This abstract presents the second interim results of patients treated with esketamine and whom data collection ranges from Oct.2019 and Sept.2021. RESULTS: 66.7% of patients were females. Average age was 49 years old with 26 patients > 65 years old. Duration of the current depressive episode was 26.0 months (mean). 48.8% of patient have > 1 suicide attempt during whole life. At esketamine initiation, 78.2% patients were clinically perceived to have severe depression with a MADRS score of 32.4 (median) and a PHQ9 score of 19.5 (median). For the overall sample, esketamine was prescribed in median as a 3(rd) line and for 40.5% of patients after neurostimulation. The majority of the patient started esketamine at 28 mg or 56 mg and increased the dose to 84 mg. After 4 months of treatment, clinical benefits are the following: decrease of MADRS total score -16.5 points (median) corresponding to 58% of responders and a PHQ9 total score decrease of -8.6 points (median). No new safety signal detected. CONCLUSIONS: This second interim analysis describes patients’ profiles and clinical evolution over a longer period and a broader population than the first interim analysis. The conditions of use are consistent with the ones approved by health authorities. DISCLOSURE: I (Marie-Alix Codet) works as a full employee at Janssen Cilag |
---|