Cargando…

Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome?

INTRODUCTION: Post-intensive care syndrome, which includes symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress, afflicts one-third of critical illness survivors. Symptoms persist and significantly degrade quality of life. No intervention has earned clear evidence of reducing these adverse psyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philbrick, K., Bieber, E., Karnatovskaia, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567232/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1749
_version_ 1784809350218383360
author Philbrick, K.
Bieber, E.
Karnatovskaia, L.
author_facet Philbrick, K.
Bieber, E.
Karnatovskaia, L.
author_sort Philbrick, K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Post-intensive care syndrome, which includes symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress, afflicts one-third of critical illness survivors. Symptoms persist and significantly degrade quality of life. No intervention has earned clear evidence of reducing these adverse psychological sequelae. Building on earlier pilot data, psychological support based on positive suggestions (PSBPS), is being investigated in an ongoing, randomized, controlled prospective trial across multiple intensive care unit (ICU) settings in a large, tertiary medical center. OBJECTIVES: Recognizing that even sedated patients perceive and internalize communication, we share lessons learned thus far in the art of engaging with sedated, often unresponsive patients. METHODS: Our presentation describes this NIH-funded PSBPS study, including the preparatory training and subsequent implementation of a structured script delivered daily to ICU patients, regardless of cognitive status or ability to respond. To interfere with the initial process of fear conditioning/negative memory formation, we introduce mitigating information about potentially traumatic events during the temporal window when initial memory consolidation occurs, reframing the alien, often frightening ICU environment while providing positive suggestions of safety and healing. RESULTS: Psychiatrists characteristically engage alert, communicative patients. Unfortunately, when meaningful cognitive exchange is impossible, further effort is often limited. By contrast, choosing to engage ventilated, sedated patients with active re-interpretation is a novel enterprise. We share technique and lessons learned from the first two years. CONCLUSIONS: Consultation psychiatrists are uniquely situated to explore with our critical care colleagues how best to mitigate the corrosive psychological consequences of intensive care and improve the future of ICU survivors. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9567232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95672322022-10-17 Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome? Philbrick, K. Bieber, E. Karnatovskaia, L. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Post-intensive care syndrome, which includes symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress, afflicts one-third of critical illness survivors. Symptoms persist and significantly degrade quality of life. No intervention has earned clear evidence of reducing these adverse psychological sequelae. Building on earlier pilot data, psychological support based on positive suggestions (PSBPS), is being investigated in an ongoing, randomized, controlled prospective trial across multiple intensive care unit (ICU) settings in a large, tertiary medical center. OBJECTIVES: Recognizing that even sedated patients perceive and internalize communication, we share lessons learned thus far in the art of engaging with sedated, often unresponsive patients. METHODS: Our presentation describes this NIH-funded PSBPS study, including the preparatory training and subsequent implementation of a structured script delivered daily to ICU patients, regardless of cognitive status or ability to respond. To interfere with the initial process of fear conditioning/negative memory formation, we introduce mitigating information about potentially traumatic events during the temporal window when initial memory consolidation occurs, reframing the alien, often frightening ICU environment while providing positive suggestions of safety and healing. RESULTS: Psychiatrists characteristically engage alert, communicative patients. Unfortunately, when meaningful cognitive exchange is impossible, further effort is often limited. By contrast, choosing to engage ventilated, sedated patients with active re-interpretation is a novel enterprise. We share technique and lessons learned from the first two years. CONCLUSIONS: Consultation psychiatrists are uniquely situated to explore with our critical care colleagues how best to mitigate the corrosive psychological consequences of intensive care and improve the future of ICU survivors. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9567232/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1749 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Philbrick, K.
Bieber, E.
Karnatovskaia, L.
Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome?
title Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome?
title_full Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome?
title_fullStr Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome?
title_short Can We Pick the Pocket of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome?
title_sort can we pick the pocket of post-intensive care syndrome?
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567232/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1749
work_keys_str_mv AT philbrickk canwepickthepocketofpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT biebere canwepickthepocketofpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT karnatovskaial canwepickthepocketofpostintensivecaresyndrome